Summary: Thoes files are used to build Android toolchain. D32816 makes it possible to build runtimes for targets.
Reviewers: beanz, srhines
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: pirama, jroelofs, srhines, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33561
llvm-svn: 309407
By creating this target other projects that depend on clang-generated headers (like LLDB) will no longer be order-dependent on Clang being processed by CMake first.
Also, by creating a dummy of this target in ClangConfig.cmake, projects that can build against out-of-tree clang can freely depend on the target without needing to have conditionals for if clang is in-tree or out-of-tree.
llvm-svn: 309390
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
Clang specifies a max type alignment of 16 bytes on darwin targets, meaning that the builtin nontemporal stores don't correctly align the loads/stores to 32 or 64 bytes when required, resulting in lowering to temporal unaligned loads/stores.
llvm-svn: 309382
Summary:
Allow merging short case labels when they actually end with a comment
(like a comment after the ``break``) and when followed by switch-level
comments (e.g. aligned with next case):
switch(a) {
case 0: break; // comment at end of case
case 1: return value;
// comment related to next case
// comment related to next case
case 2:
}
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35557
llvm-svn: 309370
Summary:
The current code would return an incorrect value when a preprocessor
directive is present immediately after the opening brace: this causes
the nanespace end comment fixer to break in some places, for exemple it
would not add the comment in this case:
namespace a {
#define FOO
}
Fixing the computation is simple enough, but it was breaking a feature,
as it would cause comments to be added also when the namespace
declaration was dependant on conditional compilation.
To fix this, a hash of the current preprocessor stack/branches is
computed at the beginning of parseBlock(), so that we explicitely do not
store the OpeningLineIndex when the beginning and end of the block are
not in the same preprocessor conditions.
Tthe hash is computed based on the line, but this could propbably be
improved by using the actual condition, so that clang-format would be
able to match multiple identical #ifdef blocks.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35483
llvm-svn: 309369
The EHABI definition was being inlined into the users even when EHABI
was not in use. Adjust the condition to ensure that the right version
is defined.
llvm-svn: 309327
This tests the ARM64 specific constants added in SVN r309081,
similar to the one added in r277928 for armintr.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35934
llvm-svn: 309314
r303175 made changes to have __cxa_allocate_exception return a 16-byte
aligned pointer, so it's no longer necessary to specify a lower
alignment (8-bytes) for exception objects on Darwin.
rdar://problem/32363695
llvm-svn: 309308
When an omp for loop is canceled the constructed objects are being destructed
twice.
It looks like the desired code is:
{
Obj o;
If (cancelled) branch-through-cleanups to cancel.exit.
}
[cleanups]
cancel.exit:
__kmpc_for_static_fini
br cancel.cont (*)
cancel.cont:
__kmpc_barrier
return
The problem seems to be the branch to cancel.cont is currently also going
through the cleanups calling them again. This change just does a direct branch
instead.
Patch By: michael.p.rice@intel.com
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35854
llvm-svn: 309288
Summary: The new PM needs to invoke add-discriminator pass when building with -fdebug-info-for-profiling.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35746
llvm-svn: 309282
The ARM Runtime ABI document (IHI0043) defines the AEABI floating point
helper functions in 4.1.2 The floating-point helper functions. These
functions always use the base PCS (soft-fp). However helper functions
defined outside of this document such as the complex-number multiply and
divide helpers are not covered by this requirement and should use
hard-float PCS if the target is hard-float as both compiler-rt and libgcc
for a hard-float sysroot implement these functions with a hard-float PCS.
All of the floating point helper functions that are explicitly soft float
are expanded in the llvm ARM backend. This change makes clang not force the
BuiltinCC to AAPCS for AAPCS_VFP. With this change the ARM compiler-rt
tests involving _Complex pass with both hard-fp and soft-fp targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35538
llvm-svn: 309257
This just adds the CPU to a list of commands passed to GAS when not using the
integrated assembler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33820
llvm-svn: 309256
Ensure that we define the `_Unwind_Control_Block` structure used on ARM
EHABI targets. This is needed for building libc++abi with the unwind.h
from the resource dir. A minor fallout of this is that we needed to
create a typedef for _Unwind_Exception to work across ARM EHABI and
non-EHABI targets. The structure definitions here are based originally
on the documentation from ARM under the "Exception Handling ABI for the
ARM® Architecture" Section 7.2. They are then adjusted to more closely
reflect the definition in libunwind from LLVM. Those changes are
compatible in layout but permit easier use in libc++abi and help
maintain compatibility between libunwind and the compiler provided
definition.
llvm-svn: 309226
The initializer for a static local variable cannot be hot, because it runs at
most once per program. That's not quite the same thing as having a low branch
probability, but under the assumption that the function is invoked many times,
modeling this as a branch probability seems reasonable.
For TLS variables, the situation is less clear, since the initialization side
of the branch can run multiple times in a program execution, but we still
expect initialization to be rare relative to non-initialization uses. It would
seem worthwhile to add a PGO counter along this path to make this estimation
more accurate in future.
For globals with guarded initialization, we don't yet apply any branch weights.
Due to our use of COMDATs, the guard will be reached exactly once per DSO, but
we have no idea how many DSOs will define the variable.
llvm-svn: 309195
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
Summary:
`clang --autocomplete=-std` will show
```
-std: Language standard to compile for
-std= Language standard to compile for
-stdlib= C++ standard library to use
```
after this change.
However, showing HelpText with completion in bash seems super tricky, so
this feature will be used in other shells (fish, zsh...).
Reviewers: v.g.vassilev, teemperor, ruiu
Subscribers: cfe-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35759
llvm-svn: 309113
Summary:
File path wasn't autocompleted after `-fmodule-cache-path=[tab]`, so
fixed this bug by checking if $flags contains only a newline or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35763
llvm-svn: 309112
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
std::byte, when defined as an enum, needs to be given special treatment
with regards to its aliasing properties. An array of std::byte is
allowed to be used as storage for other types.
This fixes PR33916.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35824
llvm-svn: 309058
Summary: You can now use REQUIRES:abi-breaking-checks in clang too
Reviewers: chapuni, probinson, ddunbar, jroelofs
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35426
llvm-svn: 309049
This patch adds functionality and a test for importing Objective-C classes
and their methods.
It also adds a flag to clang-import-test to set the language used for
parsing. This takes the same argument format as the -x option to the
driver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35274
llvm-svn: 309014
The instrumentation generated by -fsanitize=vptr does not null check a
user pointer before loading from it. This causes crashes in the face of
UB member calls (this=nullptr), i.e it's causing user programs to crash
only after UBSan is turned on.
The fix is to make run-time null checking a prerequisite for enabling
-fsanitize=vptr, and to then teach UBSan to reuse these run-time null
checks to make -fsanitize=vptr safe.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, a stage2 ubsan-enabled build
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35735https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33881
llvm-svn: 309007
This feature allows the analyzer to consider loops to completely unroll.
New requirements/rules (for unrolling) can be added easily via ASTMatchers.
Right now it is hidden behind a flag, the aim is to find the correct heuristic
and create a solution which results higher coverage % and more precise
analysis, thus can be enabled by default.
Right now the blocks which belong to an unrolled loop are marked by the
LoopVisitor which adds them to the ProgramState.
Then whenever we encounter a CFGBlock in the processCFGBlockEntrance which is
marked then we skip its investigating. That means, it won't be considered to
be visited more than the maximal bound for visiting since it won't be checked.
llvm-svn: 309006
Adrian Prantl