llvm-cov tends to highlight too many regions because its policy is to
highlight all region entry segments. This can look confusing to users:
not all region entry segments are interesting and deserve highlighting.
Emitting these highlights only when the region count differs from the
line count is a more user-friendly policy.
llvm-svn: 316109
llvm-cov typically doesn't highlight gap segments, but it should if the
gap occurs after an uncovered region in order to preserve continuity.
llvm-svn: 316107
In r315960, I accidentally assumed that the first line segment is
guaranteed to be the non-gap region entry segment (given that one is
present). It can actually be any segment on the line, and the test I
checked in demonstrates that.
llvm-svn: 315963
Gap areas make it possible to correctly determine when to use counts
from deferred regions. Before gap areas were introduced, llvm-cov needed
to use a heuristic to do this: it ignored counts from segments that
start, but do not end, on a line. This heuristic breaks down on a simple
example (see PR34962).
This patch removes the heuristic and picks counts from any region entry
segment which isn't a gap area.
llvm-svn: 315960
After clang started emitting deferred regions (r312818), llvm-cov has
had a hard time picking reasonable line execuction counts. There have
been one or two generic improvements in this area (e.g r310012), but
line counts can still report coverage for whitespace instead of code
(llvm.org/PR34612).
To fix the problem:
* Introduce a new region kind so that frontends can explicitly label
gap areas.
This is done by changing the encoding of the columnEnd field of
MappingRegion. This doesn't substantially increase binary size, and
makes it easy to maintain backwards-compatibility.
* Don't set the line count to a count from a gap area, unless the count
comes from a wrapped segment.
* Don't highlight gap areas as uncovered.
Fixes llvm.org/PR34612.
llvm-svn: 313597
On a Windows bot, I see a FileCheck error where the source being matched
over no longer exists, i.e it seems like it's FileCheck'ing some stale
output:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/4747
You can see "// CHECK: [[@LINE]]|{{ +}Marker at 19:3 = 1" in the
FileCheck stderr, but that CHECK line doesn't exist.
Remove the input file to FileCheck before running the test, to try and
appease the bot.
llvm-svn: 312825
A coverage segment contains a starting line and column, an execution
count, and some other metadata. Clients of the coverage library use
segments to prepare line-oriented reports.
Users of the coverage library depend on segments being unique and sorted
in source order. Currently this is not guaranteed (this is why the clang
change which introduced deferred regions was reverted).
This commit documents the "unique and sorted" condition and asserts that
it holds. It also fixes the SegmentBuilder so that it produces correct
output in some edge cases.
Testing: I've added unit tests for some edge cases. I've also checked
that the new SegmentBuilder implementation is fully covered. Apart from
running check-profile and the llvm-cov tests, I've successfully used a
stage1 llvm-cov to prepare a coverage report for an instrumented clang
binary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36813
llvm-svn: 312817
Make sure that the text and html emitters always emit the same set of
region markers, and avoid emitting redundant markers for line segments
which don't end on the line they start on.
This is related to D35925, and depends on D36014
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36020
llvm-svn: 312813
Summary:
This patch adds the -path-equivalence option (example: llvm-cov show -path-equivalence=/origin/path,/local/path) which maps the source code path from one machine to another when using `llvm-cov show`. This is similar to the -filename-equivalence option, but doesn't require you to specify all the source files on the command line.
This allows you to generate the coverage data on one machine (e.g. in a CI system), and then use llvm-cov on another machine where you have the same code base on a different path.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36391
llvm-svn: 310827
This patch makes a slight change to the way llvm-cov determines line
execution counts. If there are multiple line segments on a line, the
line count is the max count among the regions which start *and* end on
the line. This avoids an issue posed by deferred regions which start on
the same line as a terminated region, e.g:
if (false)
return; //< The line count should be 0, even though a new region
//< starts at the semi-colon.
foo();
Another change is that counts from line segments which don't correspond
to region entries are considered. This enables the first change, and
corrects an outstanding issue (see the showLineExecutionCounts.cpp test
change).
This is related to D35925.
Testing: check-profile, llvm-cov lit tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36014
llvm-svn: 310012
Vedant Kumar