This caused severe compile-time regressions, see PR43455.
> Modern processors predict the targets of an indirect branch regardless of
> the size of any jump table used to glean its target address. Moreover,
> branch predictors typically use resources limited by the number of actual
> targets that occur at run time.
>
> This patch changes the semantics of the option `-max-jump-table-size` to limit
> the number of different targets instead of the number of entries in a jump
> table. Thus, it is now renamed to `-max-jump-table-targets`.
>
> Before, when `-max-jump-table-size` was specified, it could happen that
> cluster jump tables could have targets used repeatedly, but each one was
> counted and typically resulted in tables with the same number of entries.
> With this patch, when specifying `-max-jump-table-targets`, tables may have
> different lengths, since the number of unique targets is counted towards the
> limit, but the number of unique targets in tables is the same, but for the
> last one containing the balance of targets.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60295
llvm-svn: 373060
Modern processors predict the targets of an indirect branch regardless of
the size of any jump table used to glean its target address. Moreover,
branch predictors typically use resources limited by the number of actual
targets that occur at run time.
This patch changes the semantics of the option `-max-jump-table-size` to limit
the number of different targets instead of the number of entries in a jump
table. Thus, it is now renamed to `-max-jump-table-targets`.
Before, when `-max-jump-table-size` was specified, it could happen that
cluster jump tables could have targets used repeatedly, but each one was
counted and typically resulted in tables with the same number of entries.
With this patch, when specifying `-max-jump-table-targets`, tables may have
different lengths, since the number of unique targets is counted towards the
limit, but the number of unique targets in tables is the same, but for the
last one containing the balance of targets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60295
llvm-svn: 372893
This change makes use of the newly refactored SwitchLoweringUtils code from
SelectionDAG to in order to generate jump tables and range checks where appropriate.
Much of this code is ported from SDAG with some modifications. We generate
G_JUMP_TABLE and G_BRJT instructions when JT opportunities are found. This means
that targets which previously relied on the naive one MBB per case stmt
translation will now start falling back until they add support for the new opcodes.
For range checks, we don't generate any previously unused operations. This
just recognizes contiguous ranges of case values and generates a single block per
range. Single case value blocks are just a special case of ranges so we get that
support almost for free.
There are still some optimizations missing that I haven't ported over, and
bit-tests are also unimplemented. This patch series is already complex enough.
Actual arm64 support for selection of jump tables is coming in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63169
llvm-svn: 364085
In order for GlobalISel to re-use the significant amount of analysis and
optimization code in SDAG's switch lowering, we first have to extract it and
create an interface to be used by both frameworks.
No test changes as it's NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62745
llvm-svn: 362857
Hans Wennborg