Disable the instantiation-depth-default.cpp test on NetBSD since it
requires more stack space than we have by default on NetBSD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71419
forming non-type template parameter values.
This reverts commit 93cc9dddd8,
which reverted commit 11d1052785.
We now always form `&x` when forming a pointer to a function rather than
trying to use function-to-pointer decay. This matches the behavior of
the old code in this case, but not the intent as described by the
comments.
This reverts commit 11d1052785.
This change is problematic with function pointer template parameters. For
example, building libcxxabi with futexes (-D_LIBCXXABI_USE_FUTEX) produces this
diagnostic:
In file included from .../llvm-project/libcxxabi/src/cxa_guard.cpp:15:
.../llvm-project/libcxxabi/src/cxa_guard_impl.h:416:54: error: address of function 'PlatformThreadID' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
has_thread_id_support(this->thread_id_address && GetThreadIDArg),
~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../llvm-project/libcxxabi/src/cxa_guard.cpp:38:26: note: in instantiation of member function '__cxxabiv1::(anonymous namespace)::InitByteFutex<&__cxxabiv1::(anonymous namespace)::PlatformFutexWait, &__cxxabiv1::(anonymous namespace)::PlatformFutexWake, &__cxxabiv1::(anonymous namespace)::PlatformThreadID>::InitByteFutex' requested here
SelectedImplementation imp(raw_guard_object);
^
.../llvm-project/libcxxabi/src/cxa_guard_impl.h:416:54: note: prefix with the address-of operator to silence this warning
has_thread_id_support(this->thread_id_address && GetThreadIDArg),
^
&
1 error generated.
The diagnostic is incorrect: adding the address-of operator also fails ("cannot
take the address of an rvalue of type 'uint32_t (*)()' (aka 'unsigned int
(*)()')").
This patch reapplies commit 759948467e. Patch was reverted due to a
clang-tidy test fail on Windows. The test has been modified. There
are no additional code changes.
Patch was tested with ninja check-all on Windows and Linux.
Summary of code changes:
Clang currently crashes for switch statements inside a template when the
condition is a non-integer field member because contextual implicit
conversion is skipped when parsing the condition. This conversion is
however later checked in an assert when the case statement is handled.
The conversion is skipped when parsing the condition because
the field member is set as type-dependent based on its containing class.
This patch sets the type dependency based on the field's type instead.
This patch fixes Bug 40982.
This patch reapplies commit 76945821b9. The first version broke
buildbots due to clang-tidy test fails. The fails are because some
errors in templates are now diagnosed earlier (does not wait till
instantiation). I have modified the tests to add checks for these
diagnostics/prevent these diagnostics. There are no additional code
changes.
Summary of code changes:
Clang currently crashes for switch statements inside a template when the
condition is a non-integer field member because contextual implicit
conversion is skipped when parsing the condition. This conversion is
however later checked in an assert when the case statement is handled.
The conversion is skipped when parsing the condition because
the field member is set as type-dependent based on its containing class.
This patch sets the type dependency based on the field's type instead.
This patch fixes Bug 40982.
Reviewers: rnk, gribozavr2
Patch by: Elizabeth Andrews (eandrews)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69950
The issue was introduced by D33189 which fixed PR33189.
Fixes PR38671: "destructor cannot be declared as a template" leads to segfault in Sema::LookupSpecialMember
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69225
parameter type.
We were both failing to decay the array type to a pointer and failing to
remove the top-level cv-qualifications. Fix this by decaying array
parameters even if the parameter type is dependent.
llvm-svn: 374496
We previously failed to treat an array with an instantiation-dependent
but not value-dependent bound as being an instantiation-dependent type.
We now track the array bound expression as part of a constant array type
if it's an instantiation-dependent expression.
llvm-svn: 373685
of 'typeid'.
This is a rare place where it's valid for a function type to be
substituted but not valid for a qualified function type to be
substituted, so needs a special check.
llvm-svn: 373648
Fixes PR35682. When a template in instantiated with an incomplete typo corrected type an assertion can trigger if the -ferror-limit is used to reduce the number of errors.
Patch by Mark de Wever.
llvm-svn: 371320
containing designators. The C++20 wording doesn't actually say what
happens in this case, but treating this as a non-deduced context seems
like the most natural behavior.
(We might want to consider deducing through array designators as an
extension in the future, but will need to be careful to deduce the array
bound properly if we do so. That's not permitted herein.)
llvm-svn: 370555
initializers.
This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:
* We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)
* The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
programs.
* C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
'.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.
* All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
by default.
* In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).
This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.
This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754
llvm-svn: 370544
Summary:
Clang performs various recursive operations (such as template instantiation),
and may use non-trivial amounts of stack space in each recursive step (for
instance, due to recursive AST walks). While we try to keep the stack space
used by such steps to a minimum and we have explicit limits on the number of
such steps we perform, it's impractical to guarantee that we won't blow out the
stack on deeply recursive template instantiations on complex ASTs, even with
only a moderately high instantiation depth limit.
The user experience in these cases is generally terrible: we crash with
no hint of what went wrong. Under this patch, we attempt to do better:
* Detect when the stack is nearly exhausted, and produce a warning with a
nice template instantiation backtrace, telling the user that we might
run slowly or crash.
* For cases where we're forced to trigger recursive template
instantiation in arbitrarily-deeply-nested contexts, check whether
we're nearly out of stack space and allocate a new stack (by spawning
a new thread) after producing the warning.
Reviewers: rnk, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66361
llvm-svn: 369940
default template argument expression.
We already did this for type template parameters and template template
parameters, but apparently forgot to do so for non-type template
parameters. This causes the substituted default argument expression to
be substituted in the proper context, and in particular to properly mark
its subexpressions as odr-used.
llvm-svn: 369834
Clang currently crashes for switch statements inside a template when
the condition is a non-integer field. The crash is due to incorrect
type-dependency of field. Type-dependency of member expressions is
currently set based on the containing class. This patch changes this for
'members of the current instantiation' to set the type dependency based
on the member's type instead.
A few lit tests started to fail once I applied this patch because errors
are now diagnosed earlier (does not wait till instantiation). I've modified
these tests in this patch as well.
Patch fixes PR#40982
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61027
llvm-svn: 368706
As discussed in D64780 the wording of this warning message is being
changed to say 'is not supported' instead of 'ignored', and the
diag ID itself is being changed to warn_cconv_not_supported.
llvm-svn: 366368
Summary:
This case is particularly important for clangd, as it is triggered after
inserting the snippet for variadic functions.
Reviewers: kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64677
llvm-svn: 366200
type-dependent argument packs.
We need to strip off the PackExpansionExpr to get the real (dependent)
type rather than an opaque DependentTy.
llvm-svn: 364165
template argument contains a backreference to a dependently-typed
earlier parameter.
In a case like:
template<typename T, T A, decltype(A) = A> struct X {};
template<typename U> auto Y = X<U, 0>();
we previously treated both references to `A` in the third parameter as
being of type `int` when checking the template-id in `Y`. That`s wrong;
the type of `A` in these contexts is the dependent type `U`.
When we encounter a non-type template argument that we can't convert to
the parameter type because of type-dependence, we now insert a dependent
conversion node so that the SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr for the
template argument will have the parameter's type rather than whatever
type the argument had.
llvm-svn: 363972
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
This reinstates r362358 (reverted in r362375) with a fix for an
uninitialized variable use in UpdateMarkingForLValueToRValue.
llvm-svn: 362531
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
........
Fixes http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 362375
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
llvm-svn: 362358
This permits an init-capture to introduce a new pack:
template<typename ...T> auto x = [...a = T()] { /* a is a pack */ };
To support this, the mechanism for allowing ParmVarDecls to be packs has
been extended to support arbitrary local VarDecls.
llvm-svn: 361300
(and less wrong).
It's not correct to assume that X<something, Type> is always a
template-id; there are a few cases where the comma takes us into a
non-expression syntactic context in which 'Type' might be permissible.
Stop doing that.
This slightly regresses our error recovery on the cases where the
construct is intended to be a template-id. We typically do still manage
to diagnose a missing 'template' keyword, but we realize this too late
to properly recover from the error.
This fixes a regression introduced by r360308.
llvm-svn: 360827
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rL355317 we noticed that quite a decent
amount of code redeclares builtins (memcpy in particular, I believe
reduced from an MSVC header) with a calling convention specified.
This gets particularly troublesome when the user specifies a new
'default' calling convention on the command line.
When looking to add a diagnostic for this case, it was noticed that we
had 3 other diagnostics that differed only slightly. This patch ALSO
unifies those under a 'select'. Unfortunately, the order of words in
ONE of these diagnostics was reversed ("'thiscall' calling convention"
vs "calling convention 'thiscall'"), so this patch also standardizes on
the former.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59560
Change-Id: I79f99fe7c2301640755ffdd774b46eb44526bb22
llvm-svn: 356663
Before this commit, we emit unavailable errors for calls to functions during
overload resolution, and for references to all other declarations in
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. The early checks during overload resolution aren't as good as
the DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl based checks, as they error on the code from
PR40991. This commit fixes this by removing the early checking.
llvm.org/PR40991
rdar://48564179
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59394
llvm-svn: 356599
Eric Christopher