concerning qualified declarator-ids. We now diagnose extraneous
qualification at namespace scope (which we had previously missed) and
diagnose these qualification errors for all kinds of declarations; it
was rather uneven before. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 153577
search for the specialization (in a folding set) and, if not found
form a *Decl that is then inserted into that folding set. In rare
cases, the folding set may be reallocated between the search and the
insertion, causing a crash. No test case, because triggering rehashing
consistently in a small test case is not feasible. Fixes
<rdar://problem/11115071>.
llvm-svn: 153575
that libclang creates.
-Introduce CXGlobalOptFlags enum for the new options that can be
set on the CXIndex object.
-CXGlobalOpt_ThreadBackgroundPriorityForIndexing affects:
clang_indexSourceFile
clang_indexTranslationUnit
clang_parseTranslationUnit
clang_saveTranslationUnit
-CXGlobalOpt_ThreadBackgroundPriorityForEditing affects:
clang_reparseTranslationUnit
clang_codeCompleteAt
clang_annotateTokens
rdar://9075282
llvm-svn: 153562
flag as GCC uses: -fstrict-enums). There is a *lot* of code making
unwarranted assumptions about the underlying type of enums, and it
doesn't seem entirely reasonable to eagerly break all of it.
Much more importantly, the current state of affairs is *very* good at
optimizing based upon this information, which causes failures that are
very distant from the actual enum. Before we push for enabling this by
default, I think we need to implement -fcatch-undefined-behavior support
for instrumenting and trapping whenever we store or load a value outside
of the range. That way we can track down the misbehaving code very
quickly.
I discussed this with Rafael, and currently the only important cases he
is aware of are the bool range-based optimizations which are staying
hard enabled. We've not seen any issue with those either, and they are
much more important for performance.
llvm-svn: 153550
completion item. For example, if the code completion itself represents
a declaration in a namespace (say, std::vector), then this API
retrieves the cursor kind and name of the namespace (std). Implements
<rdar://problem/11121951>.
llvm-svn: 153545
The analyzer gives up path exploration under certain conditions. For
example, when the same basic block has been visited more than 4 times.
With inlining turned on, this could lead to decrease in code coverage.
Specifically, if we give up inside the inlined function, the rest of
parent's basic blocks will not get analyzed.
This commit introduces an option to enable re-run along the failed path,
in which we do not inline the last inlined call site. This is done by
enqueueing the node before the processing of the inlined call site
with a special policy encoded in the state. The policy tells us not to
inline the call site along the path.
This lead to ~10% increase in the number of paths analyzed. Even though
we expected a much greater coverage improvement.
The option is turned off by default for now.
llvm-svn: 153534
Report root function name with exhausted block diagnostic.
Also, use stack frames, not just any location context when checking if
the basic block is in the same context.
llvm-svn: 153532
"#include MACRO(STUFF)".
-As an inclusion position for the included file, use the file location of the file where it
was included but *after* the macro expansions. We want the macro expansions to be considered
as before-in-translation-unit for everything in the included file.
-In the preprocessing record take into account that only inclusion directives can be encountered
as "out-of-order" (by comparing the start of the range which for inclusions is the hash location)
and use binary search if there is an extreme number of macro expansions in the include directive.
Fixes rdar://11111779
llvm-svn: 153527
list of identifiers that that 'public' names at the end of the
translation unit, e.g., defined macros or identifiers with top-level
names, in sorted order. Meant to support <rdar://problem/10921596>.
llvm-svn: 153522
last N months. This required a brief soliloquy about change in
an uncertainly-versioned world.
I believe I've gotten the right target versions on all these changes.
llvm-svn: 153501
assigned to a struct. This is fallout from inlining results, which expose
far more patterns where people stuff CF objects into structs and pass them
around (and we can reason about it). The problem is that we don't have
a general way to detect when values have escaped, so as an intermediate step
we need to eagerly prune out such tracking.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11104566>.
llvm-svn: 153489
constructor, but X is not a known typename, check whether the tokens could
possibly match the syntax of a declarator before concluding that it isn't
a constructor. If it's definitely ill-formed, assume it is a constructor.
Empirical evidence suggests that this pattern is much more often a
constructor with a typoed (or not-yet-declared) type name than any of the
other possibilities, so the extra cost of the check is not expected to be
problematic.
llvm-svn: 153488
1. Don't short-circuit conditional statements that are checking flags.
Otherwise, the driver emits warnings about unused arguments.
2. -mkernel and -fapple-kext imply no exceptions, so claim exception related
arguments now to avoid warnings about unused arguments.
rdar://11120518
llvm-svn: 153478
between unscoped enumerations and class template member specializations,
whose behavior is currently under discussion in CWG (and for which there
is a preference to not implement the currently-standardized wording).
llvm-svn: 153464
unscoped enumeration members: an enumerator name which is visible in the
out-of-class definition of a member of a templated class might not actually
exist in the instantiation of that class, if the enumeration is also lexically
defined outside the class definition and is explicitly specialized.
Depending on the result of a CWG discussion, we may have a different resolution
for a class of problems in this area, but this fixes the immediate issue of a
crash-on-invalid / accepts-invalid (depending on +Asserts). Thanks to Johannes
Schaub for digging into the standard wording to find how this case is currently
specified to behave.
llvm-svn: 153461
Eric Christopher