initialization code. Exposed a bug where we were not marking an
implicit conversion as an lvalue when we were forming a call to a
conversion function whose return type is a reference.
llvm-svn: 99459
addl $12, %esp
popl %esi
popl %edi
popl %ebx
popl %ebp
jmpl *__Block_deallocator-L1$pb(%esi) # TAILCALL
The problem is the global base register is assigned GR32 register class. TCRETURNmi needs the registers making up the address mode to have the GR32_TC register class.
The *proper* fix is for X86DAGToDAGISel::getGlobalBaseReg() to return a copy from the global base register of the machine function rather than returning the register itself. But that has the potential of causing it to be coalesced to a more restrictive register class: GR32_TC. It can introduce additional copies and spills. For something as important the PIC base, it's not worth it especially since this is not an issue on 64-bit.
llvm-svn: 99455
CheckReferenceInit) over to the new initialization code
(InitializationSequence), which is better-tested and doesn't require
us to compute the entire conversion sequence twice.
llvm-svn: 99452
--- Reverse-merging r99440 into '.':
U test/MC/AsmParser/X86/x86_32-bit_cat.s
U test/MC/AsmParser/X86/x86_32-encoding.s
U include/llvm/IntrinsicsX86.td
U include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h
U lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td
U lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.h
llvm-svn: 99450
EmitReferenceBindingToExpr() rather than assuming we have an
lvalue. This is just the lowest hanging fruit for PR6024, which still
requires a bit of work.
llvm-svn: 99447
implicit methods on explicit template instantiation definitions. As a
consequence, we should emit them at every use, even if we see a explicit
template instantiation declaration.
This is already the current behaviour, but it is good to test for that :-)
llvm-svn: 99443
not get an "Unknown immediate size" assert failure when used. All instructions
of this form have an 8-bit immediate. Also added a test case of an example
instruction that is of this form.
llvm-svn: 99435
since we have absolutely no way to match them when they are declared
nor do we have a way to represent these parsed-but-not-checked friend
declarations.
llvm-svn: 99407
otherwise the SmallVector it contains doesn't free its memory.
In most cases LiveIntervalAnalysis could get away by not calling the destructor,
because VNInfos are bumpptr-allocated, and smallvectors usually don't grow.
However when the SmallVector does grow it always leaks.
This is the valgrind shown leak from the original testcase:
==8206== 18,304 bytes in 151 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 164 of 164
==8206== at 0x4A079C7: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220)
==8206== by 0x4DB7A7E: llvm::SmallVectorBase::grow_pod(unsigned long, unsigned long) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defaul
t/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4F90382: llvm::VNInfo::addKill(llvm::SlotIndex) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libcl
amav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5126B5C: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleVirtualRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::M
achineInstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int, llvm::LiveInterval&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defau
lt/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x512725E: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineI
nstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav
.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x51278A8: llvm::LiveIntervals::computeIntervals() (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libc
lamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5127CB4: llvm::LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/de
fault/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAE935: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAEB10: llvm::FunctionPassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAED3D: llvm::FunctionPassManager::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.l
ibs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8BE8E: llvm::JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(llvm::Function*, llvm::MutexGuard const&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8CA72: llvm::JIT::getPointerToFunction(llvm::Function*) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
llvm-svn: 99400
I have audited all getOperandNo calls now, fixing
hidden assumptions. CallSite related uglyness will
be eliminated successively.
Note this patch has a long and griveous history,
for all the back-and-forths have a look at
CallSite.h's log.
llvm-svn: 99399
Evan Cheng