Fixes "Use of uninitialized value $ScanView in exec" error on systems
with scan-view executable not located in the expected place.
Patch by Oliver Tušla!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77880
Summary:
Stream functions `fread` and `fwrite` are evaluated
and preconditions checked.
A new bug type is added for a (non fatal) warning if `fread`
is called in EOF state.
Reviewers: Szelethus, NoQ, dcoughlin, baloghadamsoftware, martong, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Subscribers: rnkovacs, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80015
Summary:
Its currently not possible to recreate the GNU style using the `BreakBeforeBraces: Custom` style due to a lack of missing `BeforeWhile` in the `BraceWrappingFlags`
The following request was raised to add `BeforeWhile` in a `do..while` context like `BeforeElse` and `BeforeCatch` to give greater control over the positioning of the `while`
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42164
Reviewers: krasimir, mitchell-stellar, sammccall
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79325
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33890
This revision allow the microsoft `for each(.... in ...` nonstandard C++ extension which can be used in C++/CLI to be handled as a ForEach macro.
This prevents the breaking between the for and each onto a new line
Reviewed By: JakeMerdichAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80228
Summary:
The following revision follows D80115 since @MyDeveloperDay and I apparently both had the same idea at the same time, for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 and my efforts on tooling support for AMDVLK, respectively.
This option aligns adjacent bitfield separators across lines, in a manner similar to AlignConsecutiveAssignments and friends.
Example:
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
would become
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
This also handles c++2a style bitfield-initializers with AlignConsecutiveAssignments.
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1 = 0;
uint32_t exponent : 8 = 127;
uint32_t mantissa : 23 = 0;
}; // defaults to 1.0f
```
Things this change does not do:
- Align multiple comma-chained bitfield variables. None of the other
AlignConsecutive* options seem to implement that either.
- Detect bitfields that have a width specified with something other
than a numeric literal (ie, `int a : SOME_MACRO;`). That'd be fairly
difficult to parse and is rare.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80176
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43845
When a '//comment' trails a consecutive alignment, it adds a whitespace
replacement within the comment token. This wasn't handled correctly in
the alignment code, which treats it as a whole token and thus double
counts it.
This can wrongly trigger the "line too long, it'll wrap" alignment-break
condition with specific lengths, causing the alignment to break for
seemingly no reason.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: kostyakozko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79465
If we're going to assume references are dereferenceable, we should also
assume they're aligned: otherwise, we can't actually dereference them.
See also D80072.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80166
Exactly what it says on the tin! This is clearly not the end of the road in this
direction, the parameters could be merged far more with the use of CallEvent or
a better value type in the CallDescriptionMap, but this was shockingly difficult
enough on its own. I expect that simplifying the file further will be far easier
moving forward.
The end goal is to research how we could create a more mature checker
interaction infrastructure for more complicated C++ modeling, and I'm pretty
sure that being able successfully split up our giants is the first step in this
direction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75432
The title and the included test file sums everything up -- the only thing I'm
mildly afraid of is whether anyone actually depends on the weird behavior of
HTMLDiagnostics pretending to be TextDiagnostics if an output directory is not
supplied. If it is, I guess we would need to resort to tiptoeing around the
compatibility flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76510
Party based on this thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-February/064754.html.
This patch merges two of CXXAllocatorCall's parameters, so that we are able to
supply a CallEvent object to check::NewAllocatorCall (see the description of
D75430 to see why this would be great).
One of the things mentioned by @NoQ was the following:
I think at this point we might actually do a good job sorting out this
check::NewAllocator issue because we have a "separate" "Environment" to hold
the other SVal, which is "objects under construction"! - so we should probably
simply teach CXXAllocatorCall to extract the value from the
objects-under-construction trait of the program state and we're good.
I had MallocChecker in my crosshair for now, so I admittedly threw together
something as a proof of concept. Now that I know that this effort is worth
pursuing though, I'll happily look for a solution better then demonstrated in
this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75431
The following series of patches has something similar in mind with D77474, with
the same goal to finally end incorrect checker names for good. Despite
CallAndMessage not suffering from this particular issue, it is a dependency for
many other checkers, which is problematic, because we don't really want
dependencies to also emit diagnostics (reasoning for this is also more detailed
in D77474).
CallAndMessage also has another problem, namely that it is responsible for a lot
of reports. You'll soon learn that this isn't really easy to solve for
compatibility reasons, but that is the topic of followup patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77845
D35259 introduced a case where complex types of non-long-double would
result in FI.getReturnInfo() to not be initialized properly. This
resulted in a crash under some very specific circumstances when
dereferencing the LLVMContext.
This patch makes sure that these types have the intended getReturnInfo
initialization.
It was enabled by default accidentally; still missing some important
features. Also it needs a better package because it doesn't boil down to
API modeling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80213
Summary:
This reflects changes in the spec proposal made since basic arithmetic
was first implemented.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80174
When I fixed the targets specific builtins to make sure that aux-targets
are checked, it seems I didn't consider cases where the builtins check
the target info for further info. This patch bubbles the target-info
down to the individual checker functions to ensure that they validate
against the aux-target as well.
For non-aux-target invocations, this is an NFC.
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45614
`[[nodiscard]]` after a macro doesn't behave the same as an __attribute__ resulting in incorrect indentation
This revision corrects that behavior
See original Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629756
Before:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult
FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
After:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79990
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44476
```template <typename T> [[nodiscard]] int a() { return 1; }```
gets incorrectly formatted to be
```template <typename T>[[nodiscard]] int a() { return 1; }```
This revision ensure there is a space between the template and the attribute
Reviewed By: JakeMerdichAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79905
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
With Chromium style (although that is not important) its just it defines PointerAligmment: Left
The following arguments `S&&` are formatted differently depending on if the class has an attribute between it and the class identifier
```
class S {
S(S&&) = default;
};
class [[nodiscard]] S {
S(S &&) = default;
};
```
The prescense of [[nodiscard]] between the `class/struct` and the `{` causes the `{` to be incorrectly seen as a `TT_FunctionLBrace` which in turn transforms all the && to be `TT_BinaryOperators` rather than `TT_PointerOrReference`, as binary operators other spacing rules come into play causing a miss format
This revision resolves this by allowing the parseRecord to consider the [[nodisscard]]
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80008
Summary:
Created AIXABIInfo and AIXTargetCodeGenInfo for AIX ABI.
Reviewed By: Xiangling_L, ZarkoCA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79035
I think anyone who added a checker config wondered why is there a need
to test this. Its just a chore when adding a new config, so I removed
it.
To give some historic insight though, we used to not list **all**
options, but only those explicitly added to AnalyzerOptions, such as the
ones specified on the command line. However, past this change (and
arguably even before that) this line makes little sense.
There is an argument to be made against the entirety of
analyzer-config.c test file, but since this commit fixes some builtbots
and is landing without review, I wouldn't like to be too invasive.
Summary:
FieldDecl::getParent assumes that the FiledDecl::getDeclContext returns a
RecordDecl, this is true for C/C++, but not for ObjCIvarDecl:
The Decls hierarchy is like following
FieldDecl <-- ObjCIvarDecl
DeclContext <-- ObjCContainerDecl <-- ObjCInterfaceDecl
^
|----- TagDecl <-- RecordDecl
calling getParent() on ObjCIvarDecl will:
1. invoke getDeclContext(), which returns a DeclContext*, which points to an ObjCInterfaceDecl;
2. then downcast the "DeclContext" pointer to a RecordDecl*, and we will hit
the "is_a<RecordDecl>" assertion in llvm::cast (undefined behavior
in release build without assertion enabled);
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/369
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: rsmith, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79627
Summary:
Similar to property, we print the containing interface decl as the
nested name specifier for ivar; otherwise we will get "::ivar_name".
this would fix an assertion crash in clangd: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/365
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79576
Summary:
With recovery expr, it is possible that we have a value-dependent expr
within non-dependent context.
Reviewers: sammccall, jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80200
The very essence of MallocChecker lies in 2 overload sets: the FreeMemAux
functions and the MallocMemAux functions. The former houses most of the error
checking as well (aside from leaks), such as incorrect deallocation. There, we
check whether the argument's MemSpaceRegion is the heap or unknown, and if it
isn't, we know we encountered a bug (aside from a corner case patched by
@balazske in D76830), as specified by MEM34-C.
In ReallocMemAux, which really is the combination of FreeMemAux and
MallocMemAux, we incorrectly early returned if the memory argument of realloc is
non-symbolic. The problem is, one of the cases where this happens when we know
precisely what the region is, like an array, as demonstrated in the test file.
So, lets get rid of this false negative :^)
Side note, I dislike the warning message and the associated checker name, but
I'll address it in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79415
Summary:
These files tend to be hand-authored, and people get very confused.
I can't think of any reason that such whitespace would be intended.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80160
Summary:
Wasm currently does not fully handle exception specifications. Rather
than crashing,
- This treats `throw()` in the same way as `noexcept`.
- This ignores and prints a warning for `throw(type, ..)`, for a
temporary measure. This warning is controlled by
`-Wwasm-exception-spec`, which is on by default. You can suppress the
warning by using `-Wno-wasm-exception-spec`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80061
Summary:
Variable-length array (VLA) should have a size that fits into
a size_t value. According to the standard: "std::size_t can
store the maximum size of a theoretically possible object of
any type (including array)" (this is applied to C too).
The size expression is evaluated at the definition of the
VLA type even if this is a typedef.
The evaluation of the size expression in itself might cause
problems if it overflows.
Reviewers: Szelethus, baloghadamsoftware, martong, gamesh411
Reviewed By: Szelethus, martong, gamesh411
Subscribers: whisperity, rnkovacs, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79330
Summary:
This is needed in Swift for C++ interop -- see here for the corresponding Swift change:
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/30630
As part of this change, I've had to make some changes to the interface of CGCXXABI to return the additional parameters separately rather than adding them directly to a `CallArgList`.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79942
Summary:
Add x86 feature with IBT and/or SHSTK bits to ELF program property if they are enabled. Otherwise, contents in this header file are unused.
This file is mainly design for assembly source code which want to enable CET
Reviewers: hjl.tools, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke, craig.topper, tstellar, pengfei, rsmith
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79617
Summary:
Add x86 feature with IBT and/or SHSTK bits to ELF program property if they are enabled. Otherwise, contents in this header file are unused.
This file is mainly design for assembly source code which want to enable CET
Reviewers: hjl.tools, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke, craig.topper, tstellar, pengfei, rsmith
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79617
rL82131 changed -O from -O1 to -O2, because -O1 was not different from
-O2 at that time.
GCC treats -O as -O1 and there is now work to make -O1 meaningful.
We can change -O back to -O1 again.
Reviewed By: echristo, dexonsmith, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79916
One of the pain points in simplifying MallocCheckers interface by gradually
changing to CallEvent is that a variety of C++ allocation and deallocation
functionalities are modeled through preStmt<...> where CallEvent is unavailable,
and a single one of these callbacks can prevent a mass parameter change.
This patch introduces a new CallEvent, CXXDeallocatorCall, which happens after
preStmt<CXXDeleteExpr>, and can completely replace that callback as
demonstrated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75430
Artem Dergachev