We now (1) correctly decode the branch immediate, (2) modify the immediate to
corretly treat it as PC-rel, and (3) properly populate the stub entry.
Previously we had been doing each of these wrong.
<rdar://problem/17750739>
llvm-svn: 214285
Fix the missing case in ScalarizeVectorResult() that was exposed with
libclcore.bc in Android.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4645
llvm-svn: 214266
r214242 was subtle enough it really deserves a targeted test with
comments. This adds some global variables that trigger the relevant
code path. Sorry this wasn't committed with the fix.
llvm-svn: 214243
To avoid unnecessary forward references, the reader doesn't process
initializers of `GlobalValue`s until after the constant pool has been
processed, and then in reverse order. Model this when predicting
use-list order. This gets two more Bitcode tests passing with
`llvm-uselistorder`.
Part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214242
This moves some tests around to make it clearer what's being tested,
and adds very rudimentary comment syntax to the text input format to
make specifying this kind of test a little bit simpler.
llvm-svn: 214235
full paths for its first argument.
This allows us to remove the annoying sed lines in the test cases, and write
direct references to file names in stub_addr calls (rather than <filename>
placeholders).
llvm-svn: 214211
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214189
The test being performed is just an approximation anyway, so it really
shouldn't crash when things don't go entirely as expected.
Should fix PR20474.
llvm-svn: 214177
We need to make sure we use the softened version of all appropriate operands in
the libcall, or things go horribly wrong. This may entail actually executing a
1-stage softening.
llvm-svn: 214175
Fix the sort of expected order in the reader to correctly return `false`
when comparing a `Use` against itself.
This was caught by test/Bitcode/binaryIntInstructions.3.2.ll, so I'm
adding a `RUN` line using `llvm-uselistorder` for every test in
`test/Bitcode` that passes.
A few tests still fail, so I'll investigate those next.
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214157
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214139
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
Predict and serialize use-list order in bitcode. This makes the option
`-preserve-bc-use-list-order` work *most* of the time, but this is still
experimental.
- Builds a full value-table up front in the writer, sets up a list of
use-list orders to write out, and discards the table. This is a
simpler first step than determining the order from the various
overlapping IDs of values on-the-fly.
- The shuffles stored in the use-list order list have an unnecessarily
large memory footprint.
- `blockaddress` expressions cause functions to be materialized
out-of-order. For now I've ignored this problem, so use-list orders
will be wrong for constants used by functions that have block
addresses taken. There are a couple of ways to fix this, but I
don't have a concrete plan yet.
- When materializing functions lazily, the use-lists for constants
will not be correct. This use case is out of scope: what should the
use-list order be, if it's incomplete?
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214125
These are only used when the 'ld' in the path is gold and the plugin has
been built, but it is already a start to make sure we don't regress features
that cannot be tested with llvm-lto.
llvm-svn: 214058
The subtarget information is the ultimate source of truth for the feature set
that is enabled at this point. We would previously not propagate the feature
information to the subtarget. While this worked for the most part (features
would be enabled/disabled as requested), if another operation that changed the
feature bits was encountered (such as a mode switch via a .arm or .thumb
directive), we would end up resetting the behaviour of the architectural
extensions.
Handling this properly requires a slightly more complicated handling. We need
to check if the feature is now being toggled. If so, only then do we toggle the
features. In return, we no longer have to calculate the feature bits ourselves.
The test changes are mostly to the diagnosis, which is now more uniform (a nice
side effect!). Add an additional test to ensure that we handle this case
properly.
Thanks to Nico Weber for alerting me to this issue!
llvm-svn: 214057
Rename to allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess.
On R600, 8 and 16 byte accesses are mostly OK with 4-byte alignment,
and don't need to be split into multiple accesses. Vector loads with
an alignment of the element type are not uncommon in OpenCL code.
llvm-svn: 214055
'J' represents a negative number suitable for an add/sub alias
instruction, but while preparing it to become an int64_t we were
mangling the sign extension. So "i32 -1" became 0xffffffffLL, for
example.
Should fix one half of PR20456.
llvm-svn: 214052
Lang Hames