mingw64's headers implement fabs by calling __builtin_fabs, so using the
library call results in an infinite loop. If the backend legalizes
@llvm.fabs as a call to fabs later, things should work out, as the crt
provides a definition.
llvm-svn: 221206
Now we don't warn on this code:
void __stdcall f(void);
void __stdcall f();
My previous commit regressed this functionality because I didn't update
the relevant test case which used a definition.
llvm-svn: 221188
We already have a warning on the call sites of code like this:
void f() { }
void g() { f(1, 2, 3); }
t.c:2:21: warning: too many arguments in call to 'f'
We can limit ourselves to diagnosing unprototyped forward declarations
of f to cut down on noise.
llvm-svn: 221184
parameters with nonnull attribute when comparison is always
true/false. Patch causes false positive when parameter is
modified in the function.
llvm-svn: 221163
Local variables are not initialized, and every target has
been (incorrectly) ignoring the unnecessary request for
zero initialization.
llvm-svn: 221162
Trying to import or export such classes doesn't make sense, and Clang
would assert trying to export vtables for them.
This is consistent with how we treat functions with internal linkage,
but it is stricter than MSVC so we may have to back down if it breaks
real code.
llvm-svn: 221160
This reverts commit b5bdb2ef59ab922bcb4d6e843fffaee1f7f68a8c.
This doesn't really seem necessary on second though and causes problems
with C++ enum formatting.
llvm-svn: 221158
It turns out that MinGW never dllimports of exports inline functions.
This means that code compiled with Clang would fail to link with
MinGW-compiled libraries since we might try to import functions that
are not imported.
To fix this, make Clang never dllimport inline functions when targeting
MinGW.
llvm-svn: 221154
If g:clang_format_path is set in the vimrc, that path will take precedence over
the hard coded path (which is reliant on the PATH environment variable). This
provides an easy mechanism for switching the selected clang-format binary during
development.
llvm-svn: 221108
It says there is a narrowing conversion when we assign it to an unsigned
3 bit bitfield.
Also, use unsigned instead of size_t for the Size field of the struct in
question. Otherwise they won't run together in MSVC or clang-cl.
llvm-svn: 221019
The most complex aspect of the convention is the handling of homogeneous
vector and floating point aggregates. Reuse the homogeneous aggregate
classification code that we use on PPC64 and ARM for this.
This convention also has a C mangling, and we apparently implement that
in both Clang and LLVM.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6063
llvm-svn: 221006
Summary:
The Itanium ABI approach of using offset-to-top isn't possible with the
MS ABI, it doesn't have that kind of information lying around.
Instead, we do the following:
- Call the virtual deleting destructor with the "don't delete the object
flag" set. The virtual deleting destructor will return a pointer to
'this' adjusted to the most derived class.
- Call the global delete using the adjusted 'this' pointer.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5996
llvm-svn: 220993
Now that we have initial support for VSX, we can begin adding
intrinsics for programmer access to VSX instructions. This patch
performs the necessary enablement in the front end, and tests it by
implementing intrinsics for minimum and maximum using the vector
double data type.
The main change in the front end is to no longer disallow "vector" and
"double" in the same declaration (lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp), but "vector"
and "long double" must still be disallowed. The new intrinsics are
accessed via vec_max and vec_min with changes in
lib/Headers/altivec.h. Note that for v4f32, we already access
corresponding VMX builtins, but with VSX enabled we should use the
forms that allow all 64 vector registers.
The new built-ins are defined in include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsPPC.def.
I've added a new test in test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc-vsx.c that is
similar to, but much smaller than, builtins-ppc-altivec.c. This
allows us to test VSX IR generation without duplicating CHECK lines
for the existing bazillion Altivec tests.
Since vector double is now legal when VSX is available, I've modified
the error message, and changed where we test for it and for vector
long double, since the target machine isn't visible in the old place.
This serendipitously removed a not-pertinent warning about 'long'
being deprecated when used with 'vector', when "vector long double" is
encountered and we just want to issue an error. The existing tests
test/Parser/altivec.c and test/Parser/cxx-altivec.cpp have been
updated accordingly, and I've added test/Parser/vsx.c to verify that
"vector double" is now legitimate with VSX enabled.
There is a companion patch for LLVM.
llvm-svn: 220989
Summary:
When we are adding field paddings for asan even an empty dtor has to remain in the code,
so we ignore -mconstructor-aliases if the paddings are going to be added.
Test Plan: added a test
Reviewers: rsmith, rnk, rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6038
llvm-svn: 220986
Michael J. Spencer