As suggested in the post-commit thread for rL331056, we should match these
clang options with the established vocabulary of the corresponding sanitizer
option. Also, the use of 'strict' is well-known for these kinds of knobs,
and we can improve the descriptive text in the docs.
So this intends to match the logic of D46135 but only change the words.
Matching LLVM commit to match this spelling of the attribute to follow shortly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46236
llvm-svn: 331209
Clang incorrectly applied the packed attribute to base classes. Per GCC's
documentation and as can be observed from its behavior, packed only applies to
members, not base classes.
This change is conditioned behind -fclang-abi-compat so that an ABI break can
be avoided by users if desired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46218
llvm-svn: 331136
As discussed in the post-commit thread for:
rL330437 ( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180423/545906.html )
We need a way to opt-out of a float-to-int-to-float cast optimization because too much
existing code relies on the platform-specific undefined result of those casts when the
float-to-int overflows.
The LLVM changes associated with adding this function attribute are here:
rL330947
rL330950
rL330951
Also as suggested, I changed the LLVM doc to mention the specific sanitizer flag that
catches this problem:
rL330958
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46135
llvm-svn: 331041
Summary:
It seems there isn't much enthusiasm for `-wtest` D45685.
This is more conservative version, which i had in the very first
revision of D44883, but that 'erroneously' got removed because of the review.
**Based on some [irc] discussions, it must really be documented that
we want all the new diagnostics to have their own flags, to ease
rollouts, transitions, etc.**
Please do note that i'm only adding `-Wno-self-assign-overloaded`,
but not `-Wno-self-assign-field-overloaded`, because i'm honestly
not aware of any false-positives from the `-field` variant,
but i can just as easily add it if wanted.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883#1068561
Reviewers: dblaikie, aaron.ballman, thakis, rjmccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766
llvm-svn: 330651
The WBNOINVD instruction writes back all modified
cache lines in the processor’s internal cache to main memory
but does not invalidate (flush) the internal caches.
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, ashlykov
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43817
llvm-svn: 329848
Summary:
After a remark on a FreeBSD mailing list that the clang man page did
not have any list of possible values for the `-std=` flag, I have now
attempted to exhaustively list those, for each available language.
I also documented the default standard for each language, if there was
more than one choice.
Reviewers: rsmith, dexonsmith, sylvestre.ledru, mgorny
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: fhahn, emaste, cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45406
llvm-svn: 329827
Currently we always include PTX into the fatbin along
with the GPU code.It about doubles the size of the GPU binary
we need to carry in the executable. These options allow control
inclusion of PTX into GPU binary.
This patch does not change the defaults, though we may consider
making no-PTX the default in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45495
llvm-svn: 329737
Summary:
This has just bit me, so i though it would be nice to avoid that next time :)
Motivational case:
https://godbolt.org/g/cq9UNk
Basically, it's likely to happen if you don't like shadowing issues,
and use `-Wshadow` and friends. And it won't be diagnosed by clang.
The reason is, these self-assign diagnostics only work for builtin assignment
operators. Which makes sense, one could have a very special operator=,
that does something unusual in case of self-assignment,
so it may make sense to not warn on that.
But while it may be intentional in some cases, it may be a bug in other cases,
so it would be really great to have some diagnostic about it...
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rtrieu, nikola, rjmccall, dblaikie
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: EricWF, lebedev.ri, thakis, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883
llvm-svn: 329493
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Summary:
`ASTPrinter` allows setting the ouput to any O-Stream, but that printer creates source-code-like syntax (and is also marked with a `FIXME`). The nice, colourful, mostly human-readable `ASTDumper` only works on the standard output, which is not feasible in case a user wants to see the AST of a file through a code navigation/comprehension tool.
This small addition of an overload solves generating a nice colourful AST block for the users of a tool I'm working on, [[ http://github.com/Ericsson/CodeCompass | CodeCompass ]], as opposed to having to duplicate the behaviour of definitions that only exist in the anonymous namespace of implementation TUs related to this module.
Reviewers: alexfh, klimek, rsmith
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, gsd, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, #clang
Tags: #clang
Patch by Whisperity!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45096
llvm-svn: 329391
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
The implementation of shadow call stack on aarch64 is quite different to
the implementation on x86_64. Instead of reserving a segment register for
the shadow call stack, we reserve the platform register, x18. Any function
that spills lr to sp also spills it to the shadow call stack, a pointer to
which is stored in x18.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45239
llvm-svn: 329236
Summary:
Add support for the -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack flag which causes clang
to add ShadowCallStack attribute to functions compiled with that flag
enabled.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc
Reviewed By: pcc, kcc
Subscribers: cryptoad, cfe-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44801
llvm-svn: 329122
Summary:
As we are only doing X.0.Z releases (not using the minor version), there is no need to keep -X.Y in the version.
So, instead, I propose the following:
Instead of having clang-7.0 in bin/, we will have clang-7
Since also matches was gcc is doing.
Reviewers: tstellar, dlj, dim, hans
Reviewed By: dim, hans
Subscribers: dim, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41808
llvm-svn: 328769
Adding a matcher for BinaryOperator and cxxOperatorCallExpr to be able to
decide whether it is any kind of assignment operator or not. This would be
useful since allows us to easily detect assignments via matchers for static
analysis (Tidy, SA) purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44893
llvm-svn: 328618
- Remove use of the opencl and amdopencl environment member of the target triple for the AMDGPU target.
- Use a function attribute to communicate to the AMDGPU backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43735
llvm-svn: 328347
I should have done it in rL327558 / D43162, but forgot..
I'm not 100% sure about the text, but i don't think
it warrants a whole new differential revision.
llvm-svn: 327725
Summary:
--autocomplete flag now handles all the flags passed to shell, and this
implementation breaks backward compatibily before Clang 6.0.
Reviewers: teemperor, v.g.vassilev
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44191
llvm-svn: 326889
Currently hasArgument works with both ObjC messages and function calls,
but not hasAnyArgument.
This patch fixes that discrepancy, as it's often more convenient to use
hasAnyArgument.
On a more general note, it would be great to have a common superclass
for objc-call and function call, and a matcher matching that, but that's
probably a job for another commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44169
llvm-svn: 326865
Patch contributed by @EricMarti!
Summary: I noticed that the example for SpaceAfterCStyleCast does not match its description. I fixed the example after testing it out.
Reviewers: rsmith, krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43731
llvm-svn: 326781
Summary:
When disabled, this option allows removing the space before colon,
making it act more like the semi-colon. When enabled (default), the
current behavior is not affected.
This mostly affects C++11 loop, initializer list, inheritance list and
container literals:
class Foo: Bar {}
Foo::Foo(): a(a) {}
for (auto i: myList) {}
f({a: 1, b: 2, c: 3});
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: xvallspl, teemperor, karies, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32525
llvm-svn: 326426
Gabor Buella