clang-format documentation states that having enabled
FixNamespaceComments one may expect below code:
c++
namespace a {
foo();
}
to be turned into:
c++
namespace a {
foo();
} // namespace a
In reality, no "// namespace a" was added. The problem was too high
value of kShortNamespaceMaxLines, which is used while deciding whether
a namespace is long enough to be formatted.
As with 9163fe2, clang-format idempotence is preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87587
This allows building the clang-format unit tests in only 657 ninja steps
rather than 1257 which allows for much faster incremental builds after a
git pull.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89709
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46130 from Twitter https://twitter.com/ikautak/status/1265998988232159232
I have seen this myself many times.. if you have format on save and you work in an editor where you are constantly saving (:w muscle memory)
If you are in the middle of editing and somehow you've missed a { or } in your code, somewhere, often way below where you are at the bottom of your file the namespace comment fixer will have put the namespace on the previous closing brace.
This leads to you having to fix up the bottom of the file.
This revision prevents that happening by performing an initial pass of the tokens and simply counting the number of `{` and `}` and ensuring they balance.
If they don't balance we don't do any namespace fixing as it will likely be unstable and incorrect.
Reviewed By: curdeius
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80830
Summary:
Ensure the clang-format unit tests are themselves clang-formatted
Having areas of the llvm code which are clang-format clean, give us more areas to run new clang-format binaries on ensuring we haven't broken anything.
It seems to me we SHOULD have this clang-formatted at a minimum, otherwise how can we expect others to use clang-format if we "don't eat our own dogfood", also if the tests are dependent on the formatting of the code then that would also be bad!
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79204
Summary:
Other macros are used to declare namespaces, and should thus be handled
similarly. This is the case for crpcut's TESTSUITE macro, or for
unittest-cpp's SUITE macro:
TESTSUITE(Foo) {
TEST(MyFirstTest) {
assert(0);
}
} // TESTSUITE(Foo)
This patch deals with this cases by introducing a new option to specify
lists of namespace macros. Internally, it re-uses the system already in
place for foreach and statement macros, to ensure there is no impact on
performance.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813
llvm-svn: 362740
As pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813#inline-555026, the
code which is formatted does not match LLVM formatting style.
Technically this is not a problem since these tests bypass most of the
formatter, but it can be misleading.
llvm-svn: 361984
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Explicitly avoided changing the strings in the clang-format tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44975
llvm-svn: 332350
Summary:
The current code would return an incorrect value when a preprocessor
directive is present immediately after the opening brace: this causes
the nanespace end comment fixer to break in some places, for exemple it
would not add the comment in this case:
namespace a {
#define FOO
}
Fixing the computation is simple enough, but it was breaking a feature,
as it would cause comments to be added also when the namespace
declaration was dependant on conditional compilation.
To fix this, a hash of the current preprocessor stack/branches is
computed at the beginning of parseBlock(), so that we explicitely do not
store the OpeningLineIndex when the beginning and end of the block are
not in the same preprocessor conditions.
Tthe hash is computed based on the line, but this could propbably be
improved by using the actual condition, so that clang-format would be
able to match multiple identical #ifdef blocks.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35483
llvm-svn: 309369
Summary:
Add CompactNamespaces option, to pack namespace declarations on the
same line (somewhat similar to C++17 nested namespace definition).
With this option, consecutive namespace declarations are kept on the
same line:
namespace foo { namespace bar {
...
}} // namespace foo::bar
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: kimgr, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32480
llvm-svn: 305384
Summary:
The new test case was crashing before. Now it passes
as expected.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31441
llvm-svn: 299465
Summary:
This patch adds support for namespaces ending in semicolon to the namespace comment fixer.
source:
```
namespace A {
int i;
int j;
};
```
clang-format before:
```
namespace A {
int i;
int j;
} // namespace A;
```
clang-format after:
```
namespace A {
int i;
int j;
}; // namespace A
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30688
llvm-svn: 297140
Summary:
Until now, NamespaceEndCommentFixer was adding missing comments for every run,
which results in multiple end comments for:
```
namespace {
int i;
int j;
}
#if A
int a = 1;
#else
int a = 2;
#endif
```
result before:
```
namespace {
int i;
int j;
}// namespace // namespace
#if A
int a = 1;
#else
int a = 2;
#endif
```
result after:
```
namespace {
int i;
int j;
}// namespace
#if A
int a = 1;
#else
int a = 2;
#endif
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30659
llvm-svn: 297028
Summary:
This patch makes the namespace comment fixer use the number of unwrapped lines
that a namespace spans to detect it that namespace is short, thus not needing
end comments to be added.
This is needed to ensure clang-format is idempotent. Previously, a short namespace
was detected by the original source code lines. This has the effect of requiring two
runs for this example:
```
namespace { class A; }
```
after first run:
```
namespace {
class A;
}
```
after second run:
```
namespace {
class A;
} // namespace
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30528
llvm-svn: 296736
Summary:
This patch adds a NamespaceEndCommentsFixer TokenAnalyzer for clang-format,
which fixes end namespace comments.
It currently supports inserting and updating existing wrong comments.
Example source:
```
namespace A {
int i;
}
namespace B {
int j;
} // namespace A
```
after formatting:
```
namespace A {
int i;
} // namespace A
namespace B {
int j;
} // namespace B
```
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30269
llvm-svn: 296341
Krystian Kuzniarek