I find as I develop I'm moving between many different languages C++,C#,JavaScript all the time. As I move between the file types I like to keep `clang-format` as my formatting tool of choice. (hence why I initially added C# support in {D58404}) I know those other languages have their own tools but I have to learn them all, and I have to work out how to configure them, and they may or may not have integration into my IDE or my source code integration.
I am increasingly finding that I'm editing additional JSON files as part of my daily work and my editor and git commit hooks are just not setup to go and run [[ https://stedolan.github.io/jq/ | jq ]], So I tend to go to [[ https://jsonformatter.curiousconcept.com/ | JSON Formatter ]] and copy and paste back and forth. To get nicely formatted JSON. This is a painful process and I'd like a new one that causes me much less friction.
This has come up from time to time:
{D10543}
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35856565/clang-format-a-json-filehttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18699
I would like to stop having to do that and have formatting JSON as a first class clang-format support `Language` (even if it has minimal style settings at present).
This revision adds support for formatting JSON using the inbuilt JSON serialization library of LLVM, With limited control at present only over the indentation level
This adds an additional Language into the .clang-format file to separate the settings from your other supported languages.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93528
As noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D86137#2460135 parsing of
the clang-format parameter -Wno-error=unknown fails.
This currently is done by having `-Wno-error=unknown` as an option.
In this patch this is changed to make `-Wno-error=` parse an enum into a bit set.
This way the parsing is fixed and also we can possibly add new options easily.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93459
At least with git, file paths in a diff will be relative
to the repo root. So if you are in "llvm-project/lldb"
and the diff shows "clang/foo" modified you get:
No such file or directory
From clang-format-diff.py, since clang-format was
asked to read:
llvm-project/lldb/clang/foo
Add a note to the docs to explain this.
(there is `git diff --relative` but that excludes
changes outside of the current dir)
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91799
Currently newer clang-format options cannot be included in .clang-format files, if not all users can be forced to use an updated version.
This patch tries to solve this by adding an option to clang-format, enabling to ignore unknown (newer) options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86137
This commit updates the 'CLion Integration' section in ClangFormat docs.
Key changes:
- clang-format is enabled automatically when there is a config file;
- formatting now works for indentations;
- if clang-format is enabled without a config file, CLion suggests creating it based on the IDE settings or uses the LLVM style by default.
Patch by Marina Kalashina!
Reviewers: sylvestre.ledru, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, klimek, MyDeveloperDay, sammccall, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80721
Summary:
Any change to clang-format is tested with the unit tests, However sometimes the better approach is to run it over a very large fully formatted source tree and then inspect the differences. This seems to be a source of many of the regressions found by @krasimir and by @sylvestre.ledru and @Abpostelnicu who run it over the Mozilla sources, but often these regressions are only found after changes have been committed.
LLVM itself would be a good dog-fooding candidate for similar tests except such a large proportion of the tree is not 100% clang formatted, as such you are never aware if the change comes from a change to clang-format or just because the tree has not been formatted first.
The following review is for a small python tool which scans the whole of the LLVM source tree and counts the number of files which have one or more clang-format violations.
This revision contains the tool and the output from the initial run of the tool and the generated documentation which looks like the following
Reviewers: krasimir, JakeMerdichAMD, sammccall, curdeius, bollu, alexshap, jdoerfert, DavidTruby, sscalpone
Reviewed By: curdeius
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, ilya-biryukov, simoncook, cryptoad, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, mstorsjo, s.egerton, usaxena95, aartbik, phosek, sstefan1, cfe-commits, sylvestre.ledru, Abpostelnicu, krasimir
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80627
Summary:
This diff extends the -style=file option to allow a config file to be specified explicitly. This is useful (for instance) when adding IDE commands to reformat code to a personal style.
Reviewers: djasper, ioeric, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed by: MyDeveloperDay
Contributed by: tnorth
Subscribers: cfe-commits, lebedev.ri, MyDeveloperDay, klimek, sammccall, mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72326
Summary:
By additional regex match, grouping of main include can be enabled in files that are not normally considered as a C/C++ source code.
For example, this might be useful in templated code, where template implementations are being held in *Impl.hpp files.
On the occassion, 'assume-filename' option description was reworded as it was misleading. It has nothing to do with `style=file` option and it does not influence sourced style filename.
Reviewers: rsmith, ioeric, krasimir, sylvestre.ledru, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch by: furdyna
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67750
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for formatting C# files with clang-format, I know the barrier to entry is high here so I'm sending this revision in to test the water as to whether this might be something we'd consider landing.
Tracking in Bugzilla as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Justification:
C# code just looks ugly in comparison to the C++ code in our source tree which is clang-formatted.
I've struggled with Visual Studio reformatting to get a clean and consistent style, I want to format our C# code on saving like I do now for C++ and i want it to have the same style as defined in our .clang-format file, so it consistent as it can be with C++. (Braces/Breaking/Spaces/Indent etc..)
Using clang format without this patch leaves the code in a bad state, sometimes when the BreakStringLiterals is set, it fails to compile.
Mostly the C# is similar to Java, except instead of JavaAnnotations I try to reuse the TT_AttributeSquare.
Almost the most valuable portion is to have a new Language in order to partition the configuration for C# within a common .clang-format file, with the auto detection on the .cs extension. But there are other C# specific styles that could be added later if this is accepted. in particular how `{ set;get }` is formatted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir, benhamilton, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58404
llvm-svn: 356662
With this patch, one can configure a BufWrite hook that will make the
clang-format integration compute a diff of the current buffer with the file
that's on disk and format all changed lines. This should create a
zero-overhead auto-format solution that doesn't require the file to
already be clang-format clean to avoid spurious diffs.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32429
llvm-svn: 305665
-assume-filename, -fallback-style, and -sort-includes are new. (They're also
longer than the previous options, so all descriptions shift over by some amount,
making this diff look larger than it is.)
It looks like someone renamed "General options" to "Generic Options" too.
llvm-svn: 250672
Improve the documentation for vim integration of clang-format. Prefer the use
of <c-o> to do the normal mode command execution to avoid side-effects of the
escape and re-insertion (cursor movement). Tweak the macros to use a double
return to avoid having to manually return control to the editor from the
subprocess.
llvm-svn: 220685
Add support for more filename extensions based on the list in the clang
plus JavaScript.
Also adds a -regex option so users can override defaults if they have unusual
file extensions or want to format everything in the diff.
Keeping with tradition the flag is modelled on Unix conventions, this time
matching the semantics of find(1).
llvm-svn: 196917
Dotfiles are impractical on Windows. This makes clang-format search
for the style configuration file as '_clang-format' in addition to
the usual '.clang-format'. This is similar to how VIM searches for
'_vimrc' on Windows.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1629
llvm-svn: 190413
Summary:
The main contents is in the ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst, which can be
updated from the Format.h by the dump_format_style.py script.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1597
llvm-svn: 189946
This adds documentation for both LibFormat as well as the standalone
tools and integrations built on top of it. It slightly restructures
the ClangTools documentation.
llvm-svn: 172004
mydeveloperday