Summary: This is necessary for clang-query to be able to handle comments.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52751
llvm-svn: 343665
Summary:
The new matchers can be used to check if an expression is type-, value- or instantiation-dependent
in a templated context.
These matchers are used in a clang-tidy check and generally useful as the
problem of unresolved templates occurs more often in clang-tidy and they
provide an easy way to check for this issue.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, klimek
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51880
llvm-svn: 341958
Some versions of gcc, especially when invoked through ccache (-E), can have
trouble with raw string literals inside macros. This moves the string out of
the macro.
llvm-svn: 339759
Summary:
A CXXBindTemporaryExpr can appear inside an ImplicitCastExpr, and was
not ignored previously.
Fixes the case reported in PR37327.
Reviewers: rsmith, dblaikie, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50666
llvm-svn: 339730
ObjCIvarExpr is *not* a subclass of MemberExpr, and a separate matcher
is required to support it.
Adding a hasDeclaration support as well, as it's not very useful without
it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49701
llvm-svn: 338137
Summary:
This patch introduces a new matcher for `DecltypeType` and its underlying type
in order to fix a bug in clang-tidy, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D48717 for more.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, NoQ, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48759
llvm-svn: 337703
This allows matchers like:
friendDecl(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(...)))
friendDecl(hasType(asString(...)))
It seems that hasType is probably the most reasonable narrowing matcher to
overload, since it is already used to narrow to other declaration kinds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48242
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 334930
The specifiesTypeLoc() matcher narrows a nestedNameSpecifier matcher based on a
typeloc within the NNS. However, the matcher does not guard against NNS which
are a namespace, and cause getTypeLoc to assert-fail.
llvm-svn: 334929
LLVM_ON_WIN32 is set exactly with MSVC and MinGW (but not Cygwin) in
HandleLLVMOptions.cmake, which is where _WIN32 defined too. Just use the
default macro instead of a reinvented one.
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331069
Adding a matcher for BinaryOperator and cxxOperatorCallExpr to be able to
decide whether it is any kind of assignment operator or not. This would be
useful since allows us to easily detect assignments via matchers for static
analysis (Tidy, SA) purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44893
llvm-svn: 328618
Currently hasArgument works with both ObjC messages and function calls,
but not hasAnyArgument.
This patch fixes that discrepancy, as it's often more convenient to use
hasAnyArgument.
On a more general note, it would be great to have a common superclass
for objc-call and function call, and a matcher matching that, but that's
probably a job for another commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44169
llvm-svn: 326865
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
Two new matchers for `CXXNewExpr` are added which may be useful e.g. in
`clang-tidy` checkers. One of them is `isArray` which matches `new[]` but not
plain `new`. The other one, `hasArraySize` matches `new[]` for a given size.
llvm-svn: 318909
Summary:
Allow the `isDefinition()` matcher to apply to `ObjCMethodDecl` nodes, in
addition to those it already supports. For whatever reason, `ObjCMethodDecl`
does not inherit from `FunctionDecl` and so this is specialization is necessary.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, malcolm.parsons, alexshap
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39948
llvm-svn: 318152
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
HasDeclarationMatcher did not handle DeducedType, it always returned false for deduced types.
So with code like this:
struct X{};
auto x = X{};
This did no longer match:
varDecl(hasType(recordDecl(hasName("X"))))
Because HasDeclarationMatcher didn't resolve the DeducedType of x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36308
llvm-svn: 310095
Originally, we weren't able to match on Type nodes themselves (only QualType),
so the hasDeclaration matcher was initially written to give what we thought are
reasonable results for QualType matches.
When we chagned the matchers to allow matching on Type nodes, it turned out
that the hasDeclaration matcher was by chance written templated enough to now
allow hasDeclaration to also match on (some) Type nodes.
This patch change the hasDeclaration matcher to:
a) work the same on Type and QualType nodes,
b) be completely explicit about what nodes we can match instead of just allowing
anything with a getDecl() to match,
c) explicitly control desugaring only one level in very specific instances.
d) adds hasSpecializedTemplate and tagType matchers to allow migrating
existing use cases that now need more explicit matchers
Note: This patch breaks clang-tools-extra. The corresponding patch there
is approved and will land in a subsequent patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27104
llvm-svn: 309809
documentation.
Trying to match integerLiteral(-1) will silently fail, because an numeric
literal is always positive.
- Update the documentation to explain how to match negative numeric
literals.
- Add a unit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35196
llvm-svn: 307663
r305022 assumed that floatLiteral(equals(1.2)) would also match 1.2f and
1.2l, but apparently that is not the case. Until it is clear how to
match, temporary disable the test to fix CI.
llvm-svn: 305025
Fangrui Song