Commit Graph

302 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fedor Sergeev a01be0f217 Revert "[NewPM] teach -passes= to emit meaningful error messages"
This reverts r344519 due to failures in pipeline-parsing test.

llvm-svn: 344524
2018-10-15 15:36:08 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 4155a77e98 [NewPM] teach -passes= to emit meaningful error messages
Summary:
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.

TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.

Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246

llvm-svn: 344519
2018-10-15 15:00:18 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 0dc6ac9165 [NewPM] implement SCC printing for -print-before-all/-print-after-all
Removing deficiency of initial implementation of -print-before-all/-after-all
- it was effectively skipping IR printing for all the SCC passes.

Now LazyCallGraph:SCC gets its IR printed.

Reviewed By: skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53270

llvm-svn: 344505
2018-10-15 10:46:35 +00:00
Leonard Chan 64e21b5cfd [PassManager/Sanitizer] Port of AddresSanitizer pass from legacy to new PassManager
This patch ports the legacy pass manager to the new one to take advantage of
the benefits of the new PM. This involved moving a lot of the declarations for
`AddressSantizer` to a header so that it can be publicly used via
PassRegistry.def which I believe contains all the passes managed by the new PM.

This patch essentially decouples the instrumentation from the legacy PM such
hat it can be used by both legacy and new PM infrastructure.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52739

llvm-svn: 344274
2018-10-11 18:31:51 +00:00
Richard Smith 6c67662816 Add a flag to remap manglings when reading profile data information.
This can be used to preserve profiling information across codebase
changes that have widespread impact on mangled names, but across which
most profiling data should still be usable. For example, when switching
from libstdc++ to libc++, or from the old libstdc++ ABI to the new ABI,
or even from a 32-bit to a 64-bit build.

The user can provide a remapping file specifying parts of mangled names
that should be treated as equivalent (eg, std::__1 should be treated as
equivalent to std::__cxx11), and profile data will be treated as
applying to a particular function if its name is equivalent to the name
of a function in the profile data under the provided equivalences. See
the documentation change for a description of how this is configured.

Remapping is supported for both sample-based profiling and instruction
profiling. We do not support remapping indirect branch target
information, but all other profile data should be remapped
appropriately.

Support is only added for the new pass manager. If someone wants to also
add support for this for the old pass manager, doing so should be
straightforward.

This is the LLVM side of Clang r344199.

Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, dlj, erik.pilkington

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51249

llvm-svn: 344200
2018-10-10 23:13:47 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 884e52a7d2 [New PM][PassTiming] implement -time-passes for the new pass manager
Enable time-passes functionality through PassInstrumentation callbacks
for passes and analyses.

TimePassesHandler class keeps all the callbacks, the timing data as it
is being collected as well as the stack of currently active timers.

Parts of the fix that might be somewhat unobvious:
  - mapping of passes into Timer (TimingData) can not be done per-instance.
    PassID name provided into the callback is common for all the pass invocations.
    Thus the only way to get a timing with reasonable granularity is to collect
    timing data per pass invocation, getting a new timer for each BeforePass.
    Hence the key for TimingData uses a pair of <StringRef/unsigned count> to
    uniquely identify a pass invocation.

  - consequently, this new-pass-manager implementation performs no aggregation
    of timing data, reporting timings for each pass invocation separately.
    In that it differs from legacy-pass-manager time-passes implementation that
    reports timing data aggregated per pass instance.

  - pass managers and adaptors are not tracked, similar to how pass managers are
    not tracked in legacy time-passes.

  - TimerStack tracks timers that are active, each BeforePass pushes the new timer
    on stack, each AfterPass pops active timer from stack and stops it.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51276

llvm-svn: 343898
2018-10-05 22:32:01 +00:00
Aditya Kumar 9e20ade72a Add support for new pass manager
Modified the testcases to use both pass managers
Use single commandline flag for both pass managers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52708
Reviewers: sebpop, tejohnson, brzycki, SirishP
Reviewed By: tejohnson, brzycki

llvm-svn: 343662
2018-10-03 05:55:20 +00:00
Eric Christopher dcf1d97c5c Temporarily revert "[GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default"
This reverts commit r342387 as it's showing significant performance
regressions in a number of benchmarks. Followed up with the
committer and original thread with an example and will get performance
numbers before recommitting.

llvm-svn: 343522
2018-10-01 18:57:08 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 662e5686fe [New PM][PassInstrumentation] IR printing support for New Pass Manager
Implementing -print-before-all/-print-after-all/-filter-print-func support
through PassInstrumentation callbacks.

- PrintIR routines implement printing callbacks.

- StandardInstrumentations class provides a central place to manage all
  the "standard" in-tree pass instrumentations. Currently it registers
  PrintIR callbacks.

Reviewers: chandlerc, paquette, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50923

llvm-svn: 342896
2018-09-24 16:08:15 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim baf09e5d18 Build PassBuilder.cpp with /bigobj to try and appease MSVC EXPENSIVE_CHECKS buildbot
llvm-svn: 342835
2018-09-23 11:28:47 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev ee8d31c49e [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@

The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.

Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
  and access to them.

* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
  that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
  There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
  however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
  (adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
  Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
  mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.

* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
  on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).

* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
  usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
  to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.

* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
  args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
  run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
  RepeatedPass::run.
  TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
  and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.

* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
  PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
  through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run

* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
  Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.

  Made getName helper to return std::string (instead of StringRef initially) to fix
  asan builtbot failures on CGSCC tests.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858

llvm-svn: 342664
2018-09-20 17:08:45 +00:00
Eric Christopher 019889374b Temporarily Revert "[New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework"
as it was causing failures in the asan buildbot.

This reverts commit r342597.

llvm-svn: 342616
2018-09-20 05:16:29 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev a5f279ea89 [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@

The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.

Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
  and access to them.

* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
  that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
  There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
  however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
  (adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
  Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
  mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.

* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
  on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).

* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
  usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
  to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.

* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
  args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
  run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
  RepeatedPass::run.
  TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
  and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.

* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
  PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
  through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run

* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
  Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858

llvm-svn: 342597
2018-09-19 22:42:57 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 25de3f83be Revert rL342544: [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
A bunch of bots fail to compile unittests. Reverting.

llvm-svn: 342552
2018-09-19 14:54:48 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 875c938fec [New PM] Introducing PassInstrumentation framework
Summary:
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@

The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.

Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
  and access to them.

* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
  that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
  There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
  however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
  (adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
  Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
  mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.

* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
  on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).

* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
  usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
  to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.

* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
  args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
  run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
  RepeatedPass::run.
  TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
  and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.

* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
  PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
  through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.

* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run

* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
  Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.

Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858

llvm-svn: 342544
2018-09-19 12:25:52 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas 8a1c374b2e [GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default
Rebase rL341954 since https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38912
has been fixed by rL342055.

Precommit testing performed:
* Overnight runs of csmith comparing the output between programs
  compiled with gvn-hoist enabled/disabled.
* Bootstrap builds of clang with UbSan/ASan configurations.

llvm-svn: 342387
2018-09-17 12:24:55 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas fe0512d575 Revert "[GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default"
This reverts rL341954.

The builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan` has been
failing with timeouts at stage2 clang/ubsan:

[3065/3073] Linking CXX executable bin/lld
command timed out: 1200 seconds without output running python
../sanitizer_buildbot/sanitizers/buildbot_selector.py,
attempting to kill

llvm-svn: 342001
2018-09-11 22:10:57 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas db18e972d7 [GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default
Rebase rL340922 since https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38807
has been fixed by rL341947.

llvm-svn: 341954
2018-09-11 15:55:45 +00:00
Hiroshi Yamauchi 9775a620b0 [PGO] Control Height Reduction
Summary:
Control height reduction merges conditional blocks of code and reduces the
number of conditional branches in the hot path based on profiles.

if (hot_cond1) { // Likely true.
  do_stg_hot1();
}
if (hot_cond2) { // Likely true.
  do_stg_hot2();
}

->

if (hot_cond1 && hot_cond2) { // Hot path.
  do_stg_hot1();
  do_stg_hot2();
} else { // Cold path.
  if (hot_cond1) {
    do_stg_hot1();
  }
  if (hot_cond2) {
    do_stg_hot2();
  }
}

This speeds up some internal benchmarks up to ~30%.

Reviewers: davidxl

Reviewed By: davidxl

Subscribers: xbolva00, dmgreen, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50591

llvm-svn: 341386
2018-09-04 17:19:13 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas f6db5bcd38 Revert r340922 "[GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default"
Another sanitizer buildbot failed this time at bootstrap when
compiling SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp with this assertion:
`dominates(MD, U) && "Memory Def does not dominate it's uses"'.

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/15047

llvm-svn: 340925
2018-08-29 13:00:55 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas c03b9b8854 [GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default
Rebase rL338240 since the excessive memory usage observed when using
GVNHoist with UBSan has been fixed by rL340818.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49858

llvm-svn: 340922
2018-08-29 11:58:34 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich 1c7160e85f Revert "[GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default"
This reverts commit r338240 because it was causing OOMs on the UBSan
buildbot when building clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp

llvm-svn: 338297
2018-07-30 20:07:33 +00:00
Alexandros Lamprineas de3ca964c1 [GVNHoist] Re-enable GVNHoist by default
My initial motivation for this came from https://reviews.llvm.org/D48122,
where it was pointed out that my change didn't fit well in SimplifyCFG and
therefore using GVNHoist was a better way to go. GVNHoist has been disabled
for a while as there was a list of bugs related to it.

I have fixed the following bugs:

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37808 -> https://reviews.llvm.org/D48372 (rL337149)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36787 -> https://reviews.llvm.org/D49555 (rL337674)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37445 -> https://reviews.llvm.org/D49425 (rL337680)

The next two bugs no longer occur, and it's unclear which commit fixed them:

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36635
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37791

I investigated this one and proved to be unrelated to GVNHoist, but a genuine bug in NewGvn:

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37660

To convince myself GVNHoist is in a good state I made a successful bootstrap build of LLVM.
Merging this change now in order to make it to the LLVM 7.0.0 branch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49858

llvm-svn: 338240
2018-07-30 10:50:18 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 28023dbed7 [ThinLTO] Enable ThinLTO WholeProgramDevirt and LowerTypeTests in new PM
Summary:
Enable these passes for CFI and WPD in ThinLTO and LTO with the new pass
manager. Add a couple of tests for both PMs based on the clang tests
tools/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-cfi*.ll, but just test
through llvm-lto2 and not with distributed ThinLTO.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49429

llvm-svn: 337461
2018-07-19 14:51:32 +00:00
Michael J. Spencer 7bb2767fba Recommit r335794 "Add support for generating a call graph profile from Branch Frequency Info." with fix for removed functions.
llvm-svn: 337140
2018-07-16 00:28:24 +00:00
David Green 963401d2be [UnrollAndJam] New Unroll and Jam pass
This is a simple implementation of the unroll-and-jam classical loop
optimisation.

The basic idea is that we take an outer loop of the form:

  for i..
    ForeBlocks(i)
    for j..
      SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
    AftBlocks(i)

Instead of doing normal inner or outer unrolling, we unroll as follows:

  for i... i+=2
    ForeBlocks(i)
    ForeBlocks(i+1)
    for j..
      SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
      SubLoopBlocks(i+1, j)
    AftBlocks(i)
    AftBlocks(i+1)
  Remainder Loop

So we have unrolled the outer loop, then jammed the two inner loops into
one. This can lead to a simpler inner loop if memory accesses can be shared
between the now jammed loops.

To do this we have to prove that this is all safe, both for the memory
accesses (using dependence analysis) and that ForeBlocks(i+1) can move before
AftBlocks(i) and SubLoopBlocks(i, j).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41953

llvm-svn: 336062
2018-07-01 12:47:30 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 7c557f804d [instsimplify] Move the instsimplify pass to use more obvious file names
and diretory.

Also cleans up all the associated naming to be consistent and removes
the public access to the pass ID which was unused in LLVM.

Also runs clang-format over parts that changed, which generally cleans
up a bunch of formatting.

This is in preparation for doing some internal cleanups to the pass.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47352

llvm-svn: 336028
2018-06-29 23:36:03 +00:00
Sean Fertile cd0d7634f6 Revert "Extend CFGPrinter and CallPrinter with Heat Colors"
This reverts r335996 which broke graph printing in Polly.

llvm-svn: 336000
2018-06-29 17:48:58 +00:00
Sean Fertile 3b0535b424 Extend CFGPrinter and CallPrinter with Heat Colors
Extends the CFGPrinter and CallPrinter with heat colors based on heuristics or
profiling information. The colors are enabled by default and can be toggled
on/off for CFGPrinter by using the option -cfg-heat-colors for both
-dot-cfg[-only] and -view-cfg[-only].  Similarly, the colors can be toggled
on/off for CallPrinter by using the option -callgraph-heat-colors for both
-dot-callgraph and -view-callgraph.

Patch by Rodrigo Caetano Rocha!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40425

llvm-svn: 335996
2018-06-29 17:13:58 +00:00
John Brawn bdbbd8381f Add a PhiValuesAnalysis pass to calculate the underlying values of phis
This pass is being added in order to make the information available to BasicAA,
which can't do caching of this information itself, but possibly this information
may be useful for other passes.

Incorporates code based on Daniel Berlin's implementation of Tarjan's algorithm.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47893

llvm-svn: 335857
2018-06-28 14:13:06 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 269eb21e1c Revert "Add support for generating a call graph profile from Branch Frequency Info."
This reverts commits r335794 and r335797. Breaks ThinLTO+FDO selfhost.

llvm-svn: 335851
2018-06-28 13:15:03 +00:00
Michael J. Spencer 5bf1ead377 Add support for generating a call graph profile from Branch Frequency Info.
=== Generating the CG Profile ===

The CGProfile module pass simply gets the block profile count for each BB and scans for call instructions.  For each call instruction it adds an edge from the current function to the called function with the current BB block profile count as the weight.

After scanning all the functions, it generates an appending module flag containing the data. The format looks like:
```
!llvm.module.flags = !{!0}

!0 = !{i32 5, !"CG Profile", !1}
!1 = !{!2, !3, !4} ; List of edges
!2 = !{void ()* @a, void ()* @b, i64 32} ; Edge from a to b with a weight of 32
!3 = !{void (i1)* @freq, void ()* @a, i64 11}
!4 = !{void (i1)* @freq, void ()* @b, i64 20}
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48105

llvm-svn: 335794
2018-06-27 23:58:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 71fd27043e [PM/LoopUnswitch] When using the new SimpleLoopUnswitch pass, schedule
loop-cleanup passes at the beginning of the loop pass pipeline, and
re-enqueue loops after even trivial unswitching.

This will allow us to much more consistently avoid simplifying code
while doing trivial unswitching. I've also added a test case that
specifically shows effective iteration using this technique.

I've unconditionally updated the new PM as that is always using the
SimpleLoopUnswitch pass, and I've made the pipeline changes for the old
PM conditional on using this new unswitch pass. I added a bunch of
comments to the loop pass pipeline in the old PM to make it more clear
what is going on when reviewing.

Hopefully this will unblock doing *partial* unswitching instead of just
full unswitching.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47408

llvm-svn: 333493
2018-05-30 02:46:45 +00:00
David Green aee7ad0cde Revert 333358 as it's failing on some builders.
I'm guessing the tests reply on the ARM backend being built.

llvm-svn: 333359
2018-05-27 12:54:33 +00:00
David Green 3034281b43 [UnrollAndJam] Add a new Unroll and Jam pass
This is a simple implementation of the unroll-and-jam classical loop
optimisation.

The basic idea is that we take an outer loop of the form:

for i..
  ForeBlocks(i)
  for j..
    SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
  AftBlocks(i)

Instead of doing normal inner or outer unrolling, we unroll as follows:

for i... i+=2
  ForeBlocks(i)
  ForeBlocks(i+1)
  for j..
    SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
    SubLoopBlocks(i+1, j)
  AftBlocks(i)
  AftBlocks(i+1)
Remainder

So we have unrolled the outer loop, then jammed the two inner loops into
one. This can lead to a simpler inner loop if memory accesses can be shared
between the now-jammed loops.

To do this we have to prove that this is all safe, both for the memory
accesses (using dependence analysis) and that ForeBlocks(i+1) can move before
AftBlocks(i) and SubLoopBlocks(i, j).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41953

llvm-svn: 333358
2018-05-27 12:11:21 +00:00
Chandler Carruth e6c30fdda7 Restore the LoopInstSimplify pass, reverting r327329 that removed it.
The plan had always been to move towards using this rather than so much
in-pass simplification within the loop pipeline, but we never got around
to it.... until only a couple months after it was removed due to disuse.
=/

This commit is just a pure revert of the removal. I will add tests and
do some basic cleanup in follow-up commits. Then I'll wire it into the
loop pass pipeline.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47353

llvm-svn: 333250
2018-05-25 01:32:36 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 5f8f34e459 Remove \brief commands from doxygen comments.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.

Patch produced by

  for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290

llvm-svn: 331272
2018-05-01 15:54:18 +00:00
Gabor Buella ad9a04295e NFC, Avoid a warning on pointer casting in PassPlugin.cpp
llvm-svn: 331179
2018-04-30 14:21:28 +00:00
Philip Pfaffe 131fb978b0 Re-land r329273: [Plugins] Add a slim plugin API to work together with the new PM
Fix unittest: Do not link LLVM into the test plugin.
Additionally, remove an unrelated change that slipped in in r329273.

llvm-svn: 329293
2018-04-05 15:04:13 +00:00
Philip Pfaffe e6b49ef286 Revert "[Plugins] Add a slim plugin API to work together with the new PM"
This reverts commit ecf3ba1ab45edb1b0fadce716a7facf50dca4fbb/r329273.

llvm-svn: 329276
2018-04-05 12:42:12 +00:00
Philip Pfaffe e8f3ae9da0 [Plugins] Add a slim plugin API to work together with the new PM
Summary:
Add a new plugin API. This closes the gap between pass registration and out-of-tree passes for the new PassManager.

Unlike with the existing API, interaction with a plugin is always
initiated from the tools perspective. I.e., when a plugin is loaded, it
resolves and calls a well-known symbol `llvmGetPassPluginInfo` to obtain
details about the plugin. The fundamental motivation is to get rid of as
many global constructors as possible.  The API exposed by the plugin
info is kept intentionally minimal.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: bollu, grosser, lksbhm, mgorny, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35258

llvm-svn: 329273
2018-04-05 11:29:37 +00:00
David Blaikie 4fe1fe1418 Fix Layering, move instrumentation transform headers into Instrumentation subdirectory
llvm-svn: 328379
2018-03-23 22:11:06 +00:00
David Blaikie 301627f875 Move SampleProfile.h into IPO along with the rest of the IPO pass headers
llvm-svn: 328262
2018-03-22 22:42:44 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 194a407bda [New PM][IRCE] port of Inductive Range Check Elimination pass to the new pass manager
There are two nontrivial details here:
* Loop structure update interface is quite different with new pass manager,
  so the code to add new loops was factored out

* BranchProbabilityInfo is not a loop analysis, so it can not be just getResult'ed from
  within the loop pass. It cant even be queried through getCachedResult as LoopCanonicalization
  sequence (e.g. LoopSimplify) might invalidate BPI results.

  Complete solution for BPI will likely take some time to discuss and figure out,
  so for now this was partially solved by making BPI optional in IRCE
  (skipping a couple of profitability checks if it is absent).

Most of the IRCE tests got their corresponding new-pass-manager variant enabled.
Only two of them depend on BPI, both marked with TODO, to be turned on when BPI
starts being available for loop passes.

Reviewers: chandlerc, mkazantsev, sanjoy, asbirlea
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43795

llvm-svn: 327619
2018-03-15 11:01:19 +00:00
Vedant Kumar 3a408538f0 Remove the LoopInstSimplify pass (-loop-instsimplify)
LoopInstSimplify is unused and untested. Reading through the commit
history the pass also seems to have a high maintenance burden.

It would be best to retire the pass for now. It should be easy to
recover if we need something similar in the future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053

llvm-svn: 327329
2018-03-12 20:49:42 +00:00
Amjad Aboud f1f57a3137 Another try to commit 323321 (aggressive instruction combine).
llvm-svn: 323416
2018-01-25 12:06:32 +00:00
Amjad Aboud d53504e379 Reverted 323321.
llvm-svn: 323326
2018-01-24 14:48:49 +00:00
Amjad Aboud e4453233d7 [InstCombine] Introducing Aggressive Instruction Combine pass (-aggressive-instcombine).
Combine expression patterns to form expressions with fewer, simple instructions.
This pass does not modify the CFG.

For example, this pass reduce width of expressions post-dominated by TruncInst
into smaller width when applicable.

It differs from instcombine pass in that it contains pattern optimization that
requires higher complexity than the O(1), thus, it should run fewer times than
instcombine pass.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38313

llvm-svn: 323321
2018-01-24 12:42:42 +00:00
Malcolm Parsons 21e545d08d Fix typos of occurred and occurrence
llvm-svn: 323318
2018-01-24 10:33:39 +00:00
David Blaikie 0c64f5a2eb NewPM: Add an extension point for the start of the pipeline.
This applies to most pipelines except the LTO and ThinLTO backend
actions - it is for use at the beginning of the overall pipeline.

This extension point will be used to add the GCOV pass when enabled in
Clang.

llvm-svn: 323166
2018-01-23 01:25:20 +00:00