Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuanfang Chen 4ad7685258 Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"""
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.

Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
2020-02-13 10:16:06 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 17122ec10a Revert "Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`""""
This reverts commit bb51d24330.
2020-02-13 10:08:05 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen bb51d24330 Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"""
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.

On bots llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-ubuntu and
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian only,
llc returns 0 for these two tests unexpectedly. I tweaked the RUN line a little
bit in the hope that LIT is the culprit since this change is not in the
codepath these tests are testing.
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
2020-02-13 10:02:53 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 80a34ae311 Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`""
This reverts commit rGcd5b308b828e, rGcd5b308b828e, rG8cedf0e2994c.

There are issues to be investigated for polly bots and bots turning on
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
2020-02-11 20:41:53 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 8cedf0e299 Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"
Summary:
Reland D67847 after D73742 is committed. Replace `sys::Process::Exit(1)`
with `abort` in `report_fatal_error`.

After this patch, for tools turning on `CrashRecoveryContext`,
crash handler installed by `CrashRecoveryContext` is called unless
they installed a non-returning handler using `llvm::install_fatal_error_handler`
like `cc1_main` currently does.

Reviewers: rnk, MaskRay, aganea, hans, espindola, jhenderson

Subscribers: jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, rupprecht, jocewei, jsji, Jim, dmgreen, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74456
2020-02-11 18:20:40 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 6e24c6037f Revert "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"
This reverts commit 647c3f4e47.

Got bots failure from sanitizer-windows and maybe others.
2020-01-15 17:52:25 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 647c3f4e47 [Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.

** The reason it fixes PR35547 is

`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).

Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola

Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay

Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
2020-01-15 17:05:13 -08:00
Daniel Sanders de393329b9 [mips] Don't derive the default ABI from the CPU in the backend.
Summary:
The backend has no reason to behave like a driver and should generally do
as it's told (and error out if it can't) instead of trying to figure out
what the API user meant. The default ABI is still derived from the arch
component as a concession to backwards compatibility.

API-users that previously passed an explicit CPU and a triple that was
inconsistent with the CPU (e.g. mips-linux-gnu and mips64r2) may get a
different ABI to what they got before. However, it's expected that there
are no such users on the basis that CodeGen has been asserting that the
triple is consistent with the selected ABI for several releases. API-users
that were consistent or passed '' or 'generic' as the CPU will see no
difference.

Reviewers: sdardis, rafael

Subscribers: rafael, dsanders, sdardis, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21466

llvm-svn: 273557
2016-06-23 12:42:53 +00:00
Daniel Sanders b7f1c6ff3e [mips][mips64r6] Add experimental support for MIPS32r6 and MIPS64r6
Summary:
Adds MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 and checks the compatibility requirements for these
processors.

I've also included comments to describe removed and re-encoded instructions,
along with placeholder def's for the new instructions but there are no
functional changes to codegen at this point.

Reviewers: jkolek, vmedic

Reviewed By: vmedic

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3622

llvm-svn: 208399
2014-05-09 09:46:21 +00:00