Summary:
This allows the client to resolve subtypes one level at a time.
For supertypes, this is not necessary, because we eagerly compute
supertypes and return all levels.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
llvm-svn: 365986
Summary:
This allows the client to resolve subtypes one level at a time.
For supertypes, this is not necessary, because we eagerly compute
supertypes and return all levels.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
llvm-svn: 365867
Summary:
I didn't manage to find something nicer than optional<bool>, but at least I
found a sneakier comment.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64216
llvm-svn: 365356
Summary:
Clang-tidy checks may emit duplicated messages (clang-tidy tool
deduplicate them in its custom diagnostic consumer), and we may show
multiple duplicated diagnostics in the UI, which is really bad.
This patch makes clangd do the deduplication, and revert the change
rL363889.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64127
llvm-svn: 365204
Summary:
This introduces a few new concepts:
- tweaks have an Intent (they don't all advertise as refactorings)
- tweaks may produce messages (for ShowMessage notification). Generalized
Replacements -> Effect.
- tweaks (and other features) may be hidden (clangd -hidden-features flag).
We may choose to promote these one day. I'm not sure they're worth their own
feature flags though.
Verified it in vim-clangd (not yet open source), curious if the UI is ok in VSCode.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62538
llvm-svn: 363680
- Remove a parameter name that was misspelled (OS used for non-stream
parameter)
- Declare operator == (TextEdit, TextEdit) outside the struct, for
consistency with other user-declared ops in our code.
- Fix naming style of a parameter.
llvm-svn: 359866
Summary: We already have the structure internally, we just need to expose it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60267
llvm-svn: 358675
Summary:
(Changes to UTF-8/UTF-16 here are NFC, moving things around to make the
cases more symmetrical)
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59927
llvm-svn: 357173
Summary:
Still some pieces to go here: unit tests for new SourceCode functionality and
a command-line flag to force utf-8 mode. But wanted to get early feedback.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275
llvm-svn: 357102
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Only run completion when we were trigerred on '->' and '::', otherwise
send an error code in return.
To avoid automatically invoking completions in cases like 'a >^' or
'a ? b :^'.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55994
llvm-svn: 350304
Summary:
File paths in URIForFile can come from index or local AST. Path from
index goes through URI transformation and the final path is resolved by URI
scheme and could be potentially different from the original path. Hence, we
should do the same transformation for all paths. We do this in URIForFile, which
now converts a path to URI and back to a canonicalized path.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54845
llvm-svn: 347739
New method returning symbol info for given source position.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54799
rdar://problem/46050281
llvm-svn: 347675
Summary:
This allows customizing the flags used when no compile database is
available. It addresses some uses of the old extraFlags extension.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53688
llvm-svn: 345973
Summary:
This was added in D34947 to support YCM, but YCM actually provides *all* args,
and this was never actually used.
Meanwhile, we grew another extension that allows specifying all args.
I did find one user of this extension: https://github.com/thomasjo/atom-ide-cpp.
I'll reach out, there are multiple good alternatives:
- compile_commands.txt can serve the same purpose as .clang_complete there
- we can add an extension to support setting the fallback command
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53641
llvm-svn: 345969
- align struct names/comments with LSP, remove redundant "clangd" prefixes.
- don't map config structs as Optional<> when their presence/absence
doesn't signal anything and all fields must have sensible "absent" values
- be more lax around parsing of 'any'-typed messages
llvm-svn: 345235
Summary:
CodeAction provides us with a standard way of representing fixes inline, so
use it, replacing our existing ad-hoc extension.
After this, it's easy to serialize diagnostics using the structured
toJSON/Protocol.h mechanism rather than assembling JSON ad-hoc.
Reviewers: hokein, arphaman
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53391
llvm-svn: 345119
Summary:
Instead of parsing into structs that mirror LSP, simply parse into a flat struct
that contains the info we need.
This is an exception to our strategy with Protocol.h, which seems justified:
- the structure here is very large and deeply nested
- we care about almost none of it
- we should never have to serialize client capabilities
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53266
llvm-svn: 344673
Summary:
This paves the way for alternative transports (mac XPC, maybe messagepack?),
and also generally improves layering: testing ClangdLSPServer becomes less of
a pipe dream, we split up the JSONOutput monolith, etc.
This isn't a final state, much of what remains in JSONRPCDispatcher can go away,
handlers can call reply() on the transport directly, JSONOutput can be renamed
to StreamLogger and removed, etc. But this patch is sprawling already.
The main observable change (see tests) is that hitting EOF on input is now an
error: the client should send the 'exit' notification.
This is defensible: the protocol doesn't spell this case out. Reproducing the
current behavior for all combinations of shutdown/exit/EOF clutters interfaces.
We can iterate on this if desired.
Reviewers: jkorous, ioeric, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53286
llvm-svn: 344672
Summary:
This paves the way for alternative transports (mac XPC, maybe messagepack?),
and also generally improves layering: testing ClangdLSPServer becomes less of
a pipe dream, we split up the JSONOutput monolith, etc.
This isn't a final state, much of what remains in JSONRPCDispatcher can go away,
handlers can call reply() on the transport directly, JSONOutput can be renamed
to StreamLogger and removed, etc. But this patch is sprawling already.
The main observable change (see tests) is that hitting EOF on input is now an
error: the client should send the 'exit' notification.
This is defensible: the protocol doesn't spell this case out. Reproducing the
current behavior for all combinations of shutdown/exit/EOF clutters interfaces.
We can iterate on this if desired.
Reviewers: jkorous, ioeric, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53286
llvm-svn: 344620
Summary:
I don't bother mirroring the full capabilities struct, just parse the
bits we care about. I'll send a new patch to use this approach elsewhere too.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53213
llvm-svn: 344617
Summary:
This patch removes the possibility to change the compilation database
path at runtime using the didChangeConfiguration request. Instead, it
is suggested to use the setting on the initialize request, and clangd
whenever the user wants to use a different build configuration.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53220
llvm-svn: 344614
Summary:
The cancelable scopes are managed by JSONRPCDispatcher so that all Handlers
run in cancelable contexts.
(Previously ClangdServer did this, for code completion only).
Cancellation request processing is therefore also in JSONRPCDispatcher.
(Previously it was in ClangdLSPServer).
This doesn't actually make any new commands *respect* cancellation - they'd
need to check isCancelled() and bail out. But it opens the door to doing
this incrementally, and putting such logic in common machinery like TUScheduler.
I also rewrote the ClangdServer class/threading comments because I wanted to
add to it and I got carried away.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52004
llvm-svn: 342135
Summary: Only accessible via the C++ API at the moment.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51437
llvm-svn: 341065
capability was given by the client
After r339738 Clangd started sending categories with each diagnostic, but that
broke the eglot client. This commit puts the categories behind a capability to
fix that breakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51077
llvm-svn: 340449
This patch adds a 'category' extension field to the LSP diagnostic that's sent
by Clangd. This extension is always on by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50571
llvm-svn: 339738
client if the client supports this extension
This commit extends the 'textDocument/publishDiagnostics' notification sent from
Clangd to the client. When it's enabled, Clangd sends out the fixits associated
with the appropriate diagnostic in the body of the 'publishDiagnostics'
notification. The client can enable this extension by setting 'clangdFixSupport'
to true in the textDocument capabilities during initialization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50415
llvm-svn: 339454
compilationDatabaseChanges in the 'workspace/didChangeConfiguration' request
This commit allows clangd to use an in-memory compilation database that's
controlled from the LSP client (-compile_args_from=lsp). It extends the
'workspace/didChangeConfiguration' request to allow the client to pass in a
compilation database subset that needs to be updated in the workspace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49758
llvm-svn: 338597
Nathan Ridge