Defining CLK_NULL_EVENT with a `(void*)` cast has the (unintended?)
side-effect that the address space will be fixed (as generic in OpenCL
2.0 mode). The consequence is that any target specific address space
for the clk_event_t type will not be applied.
It is not clear why the void pointer cast was needed in the first
place, and it seems we can do without it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63876
llvm-svn: 366546
Summary:
The previous patch did not fix the end mark. D64789
fixes second case of https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/93
Patch by @lh123 !
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64970
llvm-svn: 366545
Summary:
This patch removes the `default` case from some switches on
`llvm::Triple::ObjectFormatType`, and cases for the missing enumerators
(`UnknownObjectFormat`, `Wasm`, and `XCOFF`) are then added.
For `UnknownObjectFormat`, the effect of the action for the `default`
case is maintained; otherwise, where `llvm_unreachable` is called,
`report_fatal_error` is used instead.
Where the `default` case returns a default value, `report_fatal_error`
is used for XCOFF as a placeholder. For `Wasm`, the effect of the action
for the `default` case in maintained.
The code is structured to avoid strongly implying that the `Wasm` case
is present for any reason other than to make the switch cover all
`ObjectFormatType` enumerator values.
Reviewers: sfertile, jasonliu, daltenty
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: hiraditya, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64222
llvm-svn: 366544
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
f. `((x << MaskShAmt) a>> MaskShAmt) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
f. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
Normally, the inner pattern is sign-extend,
but for our purposes it's no different to other patterns:
alive proofs:
f: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/7U3
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64524
llvm-svn: 366540
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
e. `((x << MaskShAmt) l>> MaskShAmt) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
e. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
alive proofs:
e: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/0FT
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64521
llvm-svn: 366539
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
d. `(x & ((-1 << MaskShAmt) >> MaskShAmt)) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
d. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
alive proofs:
d: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/I5Y
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64519
llvm-svn: 366538
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
c. `(x & (-1 >> MaskShAmt)) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
c. `(ShiftShAmt-MaskShAmt) s>= 0` (i.e. `ShiftShAmt u>= MaskShAmt`)
alive proofs:
c: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/RgJh
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64517
llvm-svn: 366537
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
b. `(x & (~(-1 << maskNbits))) << shiftNbits`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
b. `(MaskShAmt+ShiftShAmt) u>= bitwidth(x)`
alive proof:
b: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/y8M
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64514
llvm-svn: 366536
Summary:
If we have some pattern that leaves only some low bits set, and then performs
left-shift of those bits, if none of the bits that are left after the final
shift are modified by the mask, we can omit the mask.
There are many variants to this pattern:
a. `(x & ((1 << MaskShAmt) - 1)) << ShiftShAmt`
All these patterns can be simplified to just:
`x << ShiftShAmt`
iff:
a. `(MaskShAmt+ShiftShAmt) u>= bitwidth(x)`
alive proof:
a: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/wi9
Indeed, not all of these patterns are canonical.
But since this fold will only produce a single instruction
i'm really interested in handling even uncanonical patterns,
since i have this general kind of pattern in hotpaths,
and it is not totally outlandish for bit-twiddling code.
For now let's start with patterns where both shift amounts are variable,
with trivial constant "offset" between them, since i believe this is
both simplest to handle and i think this is most common.
But again, there are likely other variants where we could use
ValueTracking/ConstantRange to handle more cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42563
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, huihuiz, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64512
llvm-svn: 366535
* Delete aarch64-tls-static.s: it is covered by aarch64-tlsdesc.c
* Add --no-show-raw-insn to llvm-objdump -d tests
* When linking an executable with %t.so, the path %t.so will be recorded in the DT_NEEDED entry if %t.so doesn't have DT_SONAME. The DT_NEEDED has varying lengths on different systems.
Add -soname to make tests more robust. This issue will become outstanding if we allow overlapping PT_LOAD (D64930).
llvm-svn: 366532
In debug frame information, some fields, e.g., Length in CIE/FDE and
Offset in FDE are attributes to describe the structure of CIE/FDE. They
are not related to the relaxed code. However, these attributes are
symbol differences. So, in current design, these attributes will be
filled as zero and LLVM generates relocations for them.
We only need to generate relocations for symbols in executable sections.
So, if the symbols are not located in executable sections, we still
evaluate their values under relaxation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61584
llvm-svn: 366531
Summary: The test case added in D62718 did not work unless the user was root because write bits were not set for the output file. This change uses only permissions with user write (0200) to ensure tests pass regardless of the users permissions.
Reviewers: jhenderson, rupprecht, MaskRay, espindola, alexshap
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, jakehehrlich, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64302
llvm-svn: 366527
It is necessary to generate fixups in .debug_frame or .eh_frame as
relaxation is enabled due to the address delta may be changed after
relaxation.
There is an opcode with 6-bits data in debug frame encoding. So, we
also need 6-bits fixup types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58335
llvm-svn: 366524
Summary:
Inline asm doesn't use labels when compiled as an object file. Therefore, we
shouldn't create one for the (potential) callbr destination. Instead, use the
symbol for the MachineBasicBlock.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, craig.topper
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64888
llvm-svn: 366523
Instead of taking a status and potentially returning an invalid address,
return an expected which is guaranteed to contain a valid address.
llvm-svn: 366521
Windows does not have the error EINTR when a blocking syscall is
interrupted by a signal. The ReadFile API that fgets is implemented
with instead use ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED. Check for that after fgets.
llvm-svn: 366520
Also, remove the final arg from ItaniumCXXABI in the PNaCl case since
its not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64955
llvm-svn: 366518
I plan on adding memcpy optimizations in the GlobalISel pipeline, but we can't
do that unless we delay lowering to actual function calls. This patch changes
the translator to generate G_INTRINSIC_W_SIDE_EFFECTS for these functions, and
then have each target specify that using the new custom legalizer for intrinsics
hook that they want it expanded it a libcall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64895
llvm-svn: 366516
lldb recently added a tablegen tool. In order to properly cross compile
lldb standalone there needs to be a mechanism to generate the native
lldb build, analgous to what's done for the NATIVE llvm build. Thus,
we can simply modify this setup to allow for any project to be used.
llvm-svn: 366514
Summary:
LLDB_PATH_TO_{CLANG,LLVM}_BUILD were removed and replaced with
{LLVM,Clang}_DIR. Adjust the NATIVE build to account for this.
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64959
llvm-svn: 366513
This reapplies r366142 with a fix for the failing Windows test.
Original commit message:
Creates universal binary output file from input files. Currently uses
hard coded value for alignment. Want to get the create functionality
approved before implementing the alignment function.
Patch by Anusha Basana <anusha.basana@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64102
llvm-svn: 366512
We should re-emit `#pragma once` to ensure the preprocessor will
still honor it when running on minimized sources.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64945
llvm-svn: 366509
When two .c files define a type of the same name, lldb
just picks one and uses it regardless of context. That is
not correct. When stopped in a frame in one of the .c files
that define this type, it should use that local definition.
This commit just adds a test that checks for the correct
behavior. It is currently xfailed.
llvm-svn: 366507
the xcode project. This gets it a little closer to
working, but I still have to figure out how to generate
the lldb tablegen backend from the Xcode project.
llvm-svn: 366506
Summary:
This change makes it so that passing --shared-memory is all a user
needs to do to get proper multithreaded code. This default can still
be explicitly overridden for any reason using --passive-segments and
--active-segments.
Reviewers: sbc100, quantum
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64950
llvm-svn: 366504
Add support for folding G_GEPs into loads of the form
```
ldr reg, [base, off]
```
when possible. This can save an add before the load. Currently, this is only
supported for loads of 64 bits into 64 bit registers.
Add a new addressing mode function, `selectAddrModeRegisterOffset` which
performs this folding when it is profitable.
Also add a test for addressing modes for G_LOAD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64944
llvm-svn: 366503
This is a small extension of !associated, mostly useful for the implementation
convenience of instrumentation passes that RAUW globals with aliases, such
as LowerTypeTests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64951
llvm-svn: 366502
Summary:
Other platforms don't have the capability to perform llvm_codesign
step. If LLVM_CODESIGNING_IDENTITY is set then this chunk of code would
attempt to codesign if the target was Apple. But when cross compiling
to Darwin from Linux, for example, this step would fail. So test if the
host is Apple as well.
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64942
llvm-svn: 366498
Sven van Haastregt