Some filesystems track atime always. This relaxes the test to accept either a
filesystem which does not accurately track atime or does track the atime
accurately. This allows the test to pass on filesystems mounted with
`strictatime` on Linux or on macOS.
llvm-svn: 278357
basic_string's constructor calls init which was not getting inlined. This
prevented optimization of const string as init would appear as a call in between
a string's def and use.
Patch by Laxman Sole and Aditya Kumar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22782
llvm-svn: 278356
I've put some work into the Google Benchmark library in order to make it easier
to benchmark libc++. These changes have already been upstreamed into
Google Benchmark and this patch applies the changes to the in-tree version.
The main improvement in the addition of a 'compare_bench.py' script which
makes it very easy to compare benchmarks. For example to compare the native
STL to libc++ you would run:
`$ compare_bench.py ./util_smartptr.native.out ./util_smartptr.libcxx.out`
And the output would look like:
RUNNING: ./util_smartptr.native.out
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------
BM_SharedPtrCreateDestroy 62 ns 62 ns 10937500
BM_SharedPtrIncDecRef 31 ns 31 ns 23972603
BM_WeakPtrIncDecRef 28 ns 28 ns 23648649
RUNNING: ./util_smartptr.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------
BM_SharedPtrCreateDestroy 46 ns 46 ns 14957265
BM_SharedPtrIncDecRef 31 ns 31 ns 22435897
BM_WeakPtrIncDecRef 34 ns 34 ns 21084337
Comparing ./util_smartptr.native.out to ./util_smartptr.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU
-----------------------------------------------------
BM_SharedPtrCreateDestroy -0.26 -0.26
BM_SharedPtrIncDecRef +0.00 +0.00
BM_WeakPtrIncDecRef +0.21 +0.21
llvm-svn: 278147
Neither of these results files has been update in years. Linux now has a dozen
or so buildbots tracking it and the Windows results are no longer relevant.
I plan on looking into getting a Windows buildbot going using Appveyor in the
coming days.
llvm-svn: 278087
This change allows building both shared and static version of libc++
in a single build, sharing object files between both versions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23232
llvm-svn: 278068
Summary:
The synopsis in C++11 subclause 28.8 [re.regex] has:
```
basic_regex(const charT* p, size_t len,
flag_type f = regex_constants::ECMAScript);
```
The default argument is added to libc++ by this change.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22702
Reapplies r277966.
Patch by Jason Liu!
llvm-svn: 277968
Summary:
In the synopsis in C++11 subclause 28.8 [re.regex], `basic_regex` is
specified to have member typedefs `traits_type` and `string_type`. This
change adds them to libc++.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22698
Patch by Jason Liu!
llvm-svn: 277526
It currently fails because GCC changed the mangling of templates, which affects std::atomic using __attribute__((vector(X))). The bot using GCC 4.9 generates the following message:
In file included from /home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.sh.cpp:24:0:
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic: In instantiation of 'atomic_test<T>::atomic_test() [with T = __vector(2) int]':
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.sh.cpp:66:3: required from here
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: error: 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(2) int]' conflicts with a previous declaration
__gcc_atomic_t() _NOEXCEPT = default;
^
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: previous declaration 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(1) int]'
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: -fabi-version=6 (or =0) avoids this error with a change in mangling
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: error: 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(2) int]' conflicts with a previous declaration
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: previous declaration 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(1) int]'
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: -fabi-version=6 (or =0) avoids this error with a change in mangling
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:939:5: note: synthesized method 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(2) int]' first required here
__atomic_base() _NOEXCEPT = default;
^
GCC's docs say the following about ABI version 6:
Version 6, which first appeared in G++ 4.7, corrects the promotion behavior of C++11 scoped enums and the mangling of template argument packs, const/static_cast, prefix ++ and –, and a class scope function used as a template argument.
llvm-svn: 277380
Summary:
libc++ implements std::atomic<_Tp> using __atomic_base<_Tp> with
`mutable _Atomic(_Tp) __a_`. That member must be suitably aligned on
relevant ISAs for instructions such as cmpxchg to work properly, but
this alignment isn't checked anywhere. __atomic_base's implementation
relies on _Atomic doing "the right thing" since it's under the
compiler's control, and only the compiler knows about lock-freedom and
instruction generation. This test makes sure that the compiler isn't
breaking libc++'s expectations.
I'm looking at a few odd things in the C++ standard, and will have a few
other fixes around this area in the future.
This requires building with `-DLIBCXX_HAS_ATOMIC_LIB=True`, the test
marks the dependency as REQUIRES and won't be run without.
Reviewers: cfe-commits
Subscribers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22073
llvm-svn: 277368
If the last destruction is uncontended, skip the atomic store on
__shared_weak_owners_. This shifts some costs from normal
shared_ptr usage to weak_ptr uses.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22470
llvm-svn: 277357
This is a breaking change. The SFINAE required is instantiated the second
the class is instantiated, and this can cause hard SFINAE errors
when applied to references to incomplete types. Ex.
struct IncompleteType;
extern IncompleteType it;
std::tuple<IncompleteType&> t(it); // SFINAE will blow up.
llvm-svn: 276598
In C++03 mode evaluating the SFINAE can cause a hard error due to
access control violations. This is a problem because the SFINAE
is evaluated as soon as the class is instantiated, and not later.
llvm-svn: 276594
Summary:
This patch attempts to fix the undefined behavior in __hash_table by changing the node pointer types used throughout. The pointer types are changed for raw pointers in the current ABI and for fancy pointers in ABI V2 (since the fancy pointer types may not be ABI compatible).
The UB in `__hash_table` arises because tree downcasts the embedded end node and then deferences that pointer. Currently there are 2 node types in __hash_table:
* `__hash_node_base` which contains the `__next_` pointer.
* `__hash_node` which contains `__hash_` and `__value_`.
Currently the bucket list, iterators, and `__next_` pointers store pointers to `__hash_node` even though they all need to store `__hash_node_base` pointers.
This patch makes that change by introducing a `__next_pointer` typedef which is a pointer to `__hash_node` in the current ABI and `__hash_node_base` afterwards.
One notable change is to the type of `__bucket_list` which used to be defined as `unique_ptr<__node_pointer[], ...>` and is now `unique_ptr<__next_pointer[], ...>` meaning that we now allocate and deallocate different types using a different allocator. I'm going to give this part of the change more thought since it may introduce compatibility issues.
This change is similar to D20786.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20787
llvm-svn: 276533
There is a bug in Clang 3.6 and earlier that causes compile failures.
I suspect it's due to the usage of member function parameter names in the
attributes.
llvm-svn: 276507
Summary:
This patch uses the __attribute__((enable_if)) hack suggested by @rsmith to diagnose invalid arguments when possible.
In order to diagnose an invalid argument `m` to `f(m)` we provide an additional overload of `f` that is only enabled when `m` is invalid. When that function is enabled it uses __attribute__((unavailable)) to produce a diagnostic message.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, jfb, EricWF
Subscribers: bcraig, jfb, rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22557
llvm-svn: 276506
Increasingly the .fail.cpp tests are written using -verify, making them
sensitive to the exact diagnostics generated by the compiler. To prevent
additional diagnostics from being generated, and causing the tests to fail,
this patch removes the warning flags when compiling those tests.
llvm-svn: 276208
Although inheriting constructors have already been fixed in Clang 3.9 I still
choose to fix std::function so users can derive from it with older compilers.
llvm-svn: 276090
The previous implementation relied highly on specializations to handle
special cases. This new implementation lets the compiler do the work when possible.
llvm-svn: 276084
Libc++ provides static assertions to detect reference binding issues inside
tuple. This patch adds tests for those diagnostics.
It should be noted that these static assertions technically violate the
standard since it allows these illegal bindings to occur.
Also see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20855
llvm-svn: 276078
The functions arg, conj, imag, norm, proj, and real have additional overloads
for arguments of integral or floating point types. However these overloads should
not allow conversions to the integral/floating point types, only exact matches.
This patch constrains these functions so they no longer allow conversions.
llvm-svn: 276067
Summary:
This patch does the following:
1. Checks in a copy of the Google Benchmark library into the libc++ repo under `utils/google-benchmark`.
2. Teaches libc++ how to build Google Benchmark against both (A) in-tree libc++ and (B) the platforms native STL.
3. Allows performance benchmarks to be built as part of the libc++ build.
Building the benchmarks (and Google Benchmark) is off by default. It must be enabled using the CMake option `-DLIBCXX_INCLUDE_BENCHMARKS=ON`. When this option is enabled the tests under `libcxx/benchmarks` can be built using the `libcxx-benchmarks` target.
On Linux platforms where libstdc++ is the default STL the CMake option `-DLIBCXX_BUILD_BENCHMARKS_NATIVE_STDLIB=ON` can be used to build each benchmark test against libstdc++ as well. This is useful for comparing performance between standard libraries.
Support for benchmarks is currently very minimal. They must be manually run by the user and there is no mechanism for detecting performance regressions.
Known Issues:
* `-DLIBCXX_INCLUDE_BENCHMARKS=ON` is only supported for Clang, and not GCC, since the `-stdlib=libc++` option is needed to build Google Benchmark.
Reviewers: danalbert, dberlin, chandlerc, mclow.lists, jroelofs
Subscribers: chandlerc, dberlin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22240
llvm-svn: 276049
Summary:
This patch attempts to fix the undefined behavior in __tree by changing the node pointer types used throughout. The pointer types are changed for raw pointers in the current ABI and for fancy pointers in ABI V2 (since the fancy pointer types may not be ABI compatible).
The UB in `__tree` arises because tree downcasts the embedded end node and then deferences that pointer. Currently there are 3 node types in __tree.
* `__tree_end_node` which contains the `__left_` pointer. This node is embedded within the container.
* `__tree_node_base` which contains `__right_`, `__parent_` and `__is_black`. This node is used throughout the tree rebalancing algorithms.
* `__tree_node` which contains `__value_`.
Currently `__tree` stores the start of the tree, `__begin_node_`, as a pointer to a `__tree_node`. Additionally the iterators store their position as a pointer to a `__tree_node`. In both of these cases the pointee can be the end node. This is fixed by changing them to store `__tree_end_node` pointers instead.
To make this change I introduced an `__iter_pointer` typedef which is defined to be a pointer to either `__tree_end_node` in the new ABI or `__tree_node` in the current one.
Both `__tree::__begin_node_` and iterator pointers are now stored as `__iter_pointers`.
The other situation where `__tree_end_node` is stored as the wrong type is in `__tree_node_base::__parent_`. Currently `__left_`, `__right_`, and `__parent_` are all `__tree_node_base` pointers. Since the end node will only be stored in `__parent_` the fix is to change `__parent_` to be a pointer to `__tree_end_node`.
To make this change I introduced a `__parent_pointer` typedef which is defined to be a pointer to either `__tree_end_node` in the new ABI or `__tree_node_base` in the current one.
Note that in the new ABI `__iter_pointer` and `__parent_pointer` are the same type (but not in the old one). The confusion between these two types is unfortunate but it was the best solution I could come up with that maintains the ABI.
The typedef changes force a ton of explicit type casts to correct pointer types and to make current code compatible with both the old and new pointer typedefs. This is the bulk of the change and it's really messy. Unfortunately I don't know how to avoid it.
Please let me know what you think.
Reviewers: howard.hinnant, mclow.lists
Subscribers: howard.hinnant, bbannier, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20786
llvm-svn: 276003
Constructing a std::locale object from an empty string selects the language
from the current environment variables. If the environment variables name
a locale that doesn't exist, or isn't installed, then the construction of
facets using that locale may throw.
This patch removes tests that use 'std::locale l("")'.
The optimal solution would be to manually set the environment variables
in the test. Unfortunately there is no portable way to do this.
llvm-svn: 275772
man page for mkdir says: "If the parent directory has the set-group-ID bit set,
then so will the newly created directory."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22265
llvm-svn: 275760
This patch updates the way libc++ handles checking for libatomic, in part
to prepare for https://reviews.llvm.org/D22073.
Changes:
* 'LIBCXX_HAS_ATOMIC_LIB' is now set whenever libatomic is available even libc++
doesn't need to manually link it.
* 'LIBCXX_HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITH_LIB' is now used to detect when libatomic
needs to be manually linked.
* 'LIBCXX_HAS_ATOMIC_LIB' now adds 'libatomic' as a available feature in the
test suite.
llvm-svn: 275759
This patch does the following:
* It renames `_LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR` to `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_ABI_DISABLE_PAIR_TRIVIAL_COPY_CTOR`.
* It automatically enables this option on FreeBSD in ABI V1, since that's the current ABI FreeBSD ships.
* It cleans up the handling of this option in `std::pair`.
I would like the sign off from the FreeBSD maintainers. They will no longer need to keep their `__config` changes downstream.
I'm still hoping to come up with a better way to maintain the ABI without needing these constructors.
Reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D21329
llvm-svn: 275749