First, let's check we get a TemplateDecl, before complaining about
where it might have been found.
Second, if it came from an unexpected place, show where that location is.
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116164
The diagnostics concerning mixing std::experimental and std are
somewhat wordy and have some typographical errors. Diagnostics do not
start with a capital letter nor end with a fullstop. Usually we try
and link clauses with a semicolon, rather than start a new sentence.
So that's what this patch does. Along with avoiding repetition about
std::experimental going away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116026
Since we've decided the to not support std::experimental::coroutine*, we
should tell the user they need to update.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113977
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Nathan Sidwell