Combine the recently added utilities for folded-by-construction affine
operations with the attribute-based Range to enable more folding. This
decreases the amount of emitted code but has little effect on test
precisely because the tests are not checking for the spurious constants.
The difference in the shape of affine maps comes from the internals of
affine folding.
Depends on D129633
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130167
The bubble up logic was written by assuming the slice operation is
always a normal slice that outputs a tensor with the same rank.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124283
Bubble up extract_slice above Linalg operation.
A sequence of operations
%0 = linalg.<op> ... arg0, arg1, ...
%1 = tensor.extract_slice %0 ...
can be replaced with
%0 = tensor.extract_slice %arg0
%1 = tensor.extract_slice %arg1
%2 = linalg.<op> ... %0, %1, ...
This results in the reduce computation of the linalg operation.
The implementation uses the tiling utility functions. One difference
from the tiling process is that we don't need to insert the checking
code for the out-of-bound accesses. The use of the slice itself
represents that the code writer is sure about the boundary condition.
To avoid adding the boundary condtion check code, `omitPartialTileCheck`
is introduced for the tiling utility functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122437
Alex Zinenko