Some instructions require restricted register classes, but most of the
time that doesn't affect register allocation. For example, some
instructions don't work with the stack pointer, but that is a reserved
register anyway.
Sometimes it matters, GR32_ABCD only has 4 allocatable registers. For
such a proper sub-class, the register allocator should try to enable
register class inflation since that makes more registers available for
allocation.
Make sure only legal super-classes are considered. For example, tGPR is
not a proper sub-class in Thumb mode, but in ARM mode it is.
llvm-svn: 136981
a native architecture that doesn't match the universal
slice that is being used for all executables, we weren't
correctly descending through the platform architectures
and resolving the binaries.
llvm-svn: 136980
Refactor STR[B] pre and post indexed instructions to use addressing modes for
memory operands, which is necessary for assembly parsing and is more consistent
with the rest of the memory instruction definitions. Make some incremental
progress on refactoring away the mega-operand addrmode2 along the way, which
is nice.
llvm-svn: 136978
Add the rich comparison methods (__eq__, __ne__) to SBType, too.
o lldbtest.py:
Add debug utility method TestBase.DebugSBType().
o test/python_api/type:
Add tests for exercising SBType/SBTypeList API, including the SBTarget.FindTypes(type_name)
API which returns a SBTypeList matching the type_name.
llvm-svn: 136975
The old code would look at kills and defs in one pass over the
instruction operands, causing problems with this code:
%R0<def>, %CPSR<def,dead> = tLSLri %R5<kill>, 2, pred:14, pred:%noreg
%R0<def>, %CPSR<def,dead> = tADDrr %R4<kill>, %R0<kill>, pred:14, %pred:%noreg
The last instruction kills and redefines %R0, so it is still live after
the instruction.
This caused a register scavenger crash when compiling 483.xalancbmk for
armv6. I am not including a test case because it requires too much bad
luck to expose this old bug.
First you need to convince the register allocator to use %R0 twice on
the tADDrr instruction, then you have to convince BranchFolding to do
something that causes it to run the register scavenger on he bad block.
<rdar://problem/9898200>
llvm-svn: 136973
arrays. This now suppresses the warning only in the case of
a one-element array as the last field in a struct where the array size
is a literal '1' rather than any macro expansion or template parameter.
This doesn't distinguish between the language standard in use to allow
code which dates from C89 era to compile without the warning even in C99
and C++ builds. We could add a separate warning (under a different flag)
with fixit hints to switch to a flexible array, but its not clear that
this would be desirable. Much of the code using this idiom is striving
for maximum portability.
Tests were also fleshed out a bit, and the diagnostic itself tweaked to
be more pretty w.r.t. single elment arrays. This is more ugly than
I would like due to APInt's not being supported by the diagnostic
rendering engine.
A pseudo-patch for this was proposed by Nicola Gigante, but I reworked
it both for several correctness issues and for code style.
Sorry this was so long in coming.
llvm-svn: 136965
1-element character arrays which are serving as flexible arrays. This is
the initial step, which is to restrict the 1-element array whitelist to
arrays that are member declarations. I'll refine it from here based on
the proposed patch.
llvm-svn: 136964
This patch takes some time because the old Python constructor pattern was not a valid one,
and breaks with SBTypeList's __init__ signature. Oops.
llvm-svn: 136958
inlined variable, based on the discussion in PR10542.
This explodes the runtime of several passes down the pipeline due to
a large number of "copies" remaining live across a large function. This
only shows up with both debug and opt, but when it does it creates
a many-minute compile when self-hosting LLVM+Clang. There are several
other cases that show these types of regressions.
All of this is tracked in PR10542, and progress is being made on fixing
the issue. Once its addressed, the re-instated, but until then this
restores the performance for self-hosting and other opt+debug builds.
Devang, let me know if this causes any trouble, or impedes fixing it in
any way, and thanks for working on this!
llvm-svn: 136953
And remove expectedFailure decorator for test_SBTypeMember, which no longer exists after the recent changes, replace
it with test_SBTypeList.
llvm-svn: 136947
when performing typo correction involving any overloaded template functions.
The added test cases, while currently demontrating sub-optimal behavior, will
not trigger any messages without the 1-line change to SemaExpr.cpp.
llvm-svn: 136943
Sample run on my OSX Lion (MacBook Pro):
1: test_run_gdb_then_lldb (TestDisassembly.DisassembleDriverMainLoop)
Test disassembly on a large function with lldb vs. gdb. ...
gdb benchmark: Avg: 0.201802 (Laps: 5, Total Elapsed Time: 1.009008)
lldb benchmark: Avg: 0.109569 (Laps: 5, Total Elapsed Time: 0.547843)
lldb_avg/gdb_avg: 0.542952
ok
2: test_run_lldb_then_gdb (TestDisassembly.DisassembleDriverMainLoop)
Test disassembly on a large function with lldb vs. gdb. ...
lldb benchmark: Avg: 0.109580 (Laps: 5, Total Elapsed Time: 0.547902)
gdb benchmark: Avg: 0.201587 (Laps: 5, Total Elapsed Time: 1.007936)
lldb_avg/gdb_avg: 0.543588
ok
llvm-svn: 136931
expressions that used function pointers. The problem
was that IRForTarget previously only scanned the IR
for the expression for call instructions; if a function
was used in another context, it was ignored.
Now LLDB scans the Module for functions that are only
declared (not also defined -- so these are externals);
it then constructs function pointers for these
functions and substitutes them wherever the function
is used.
Also made some changes so that "expr main" works just
as well as "expr &main"; they end up being the same
code, but LLDB was generating the result variable in
different ways.
llvm-svn: 136928
situation. When a class explicitly or implicitly (through inheritance)
"conformsTo" two protocols which conflict (have methods which conflict).
This is 2nd part of // rdar://6191214.
llvm-svn: 136927
Jakob Stoklund Olesen