Now that it is possible to dynamically tie MachineInstr operands,
predicated instructions are possible in SSA form:
%vreg3<def> = SUBri %vreg1, -2147483647, pred:14, pred:%noreg, %opt:%noreg
%vreg4<def,tied1> = MOVCCr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg1, %pred:12, pred:%CPSR
Becomes a predicated SUBri with a tied imp-use:
SUBri %vreg1, -2147483647, pred:13, pred:%CPSR, opt:%noreg, %vreg1<imp-use,tied0>
This means that any instruction that is safe to move can be folded into
a MOVCC, and the *CC pseudo-instructions are no longer needed.
The test case changes reflect that Thumb2SizeReduce recognizes the
predicated instructions. It didn't understand the pseudos.
llvm-svn: 163274
It is not my plan to duplicate the entire ARM instruction set with
predicated versions. We need a way of representing predicated
instructions in SSA form without requiring a separate opcode.
Then the pseudo-instructions can go away.
llvm-svn: 162061
allow target to correctly compute latency for cases where static scheduling
itineraries isn't sufficient. e.g. variable_ops instructions such as
ARM::ldm.
This also allows target without scheduling itineraries to compute operand
latencies. e.g. X86 can return (approximated) latencies for high latency
instructions such as division.
- Compute operand latencies for those defined by load multiple instructions,
e.g. ldm and those used by store multiple instructions, e.g. stm.
llvm-svn: 115755
float t1(int argc) {
return (argc == 1123) ? 1.234f : 2.38213f;
}
We would generate truly awful code on ARM (those with a weak stomach should look
away):
_t1:
movw r1, #1123
movs r2, #1
movs r3, #0
cmp r0, r1
mov.w r0, #0
it eq
moveq r0, r2
movs r1, #4
cmp r0, #0
it ne
movne r3, r1
adr r0, #LCPI1_0
ldr r0, [r0, r3]
bx lr
The problem was that legalization was creating a cascade of SELECT_CC nodes, for
for the comparison of "argc == 1123" which was fed into a SELECT node for the ?:
statement which was itself converted to a SELECT_CC node. This is because the
ARM back-end doesn't have custom lowering for SELECT nodes, so it used the
default "Expand".
I added a fairly simple "LowerSELECT" to the ARM back-end. It takes care of this
testcase, but can obviously be expanded to include more cases.
Now we generate this, which looks optimal to me:
_t1:
movw r1, #1123
movs r2, #0
cmp r0, r1
adr r0, #LCPI0_0
it eq
moveq r2, #4
ldr r0, [r0, r2]
bx lr
.align 2
LCPI0_0:
.long 1075344593 @ float 2.382130e+00
.long 1067316150 @ float 1.234000e+00
llvm-svn: 110799
Remove "target endian/pointersize" or add "target datalayout" to make
the test parse properly or set the datalayout because defaults changes.
For PR645:
Make global names use the @ prefix.
For llvm-upgrade changes:
Fix test cases or completely remove use of llvm-upgrade for test cases
that cannot survive the new renaming or upgrade capabilities.
llvm-svn: 33533
Jakob Stoklund Olesen