message sends, designators, and attributes.
Instead of having the tentative parsing phase sometimes return an
indicator to say what diagnostic to produce if parsing fails and
sometimes ask the caller to run it again, consistently ask the caller to
try parsing again if tentative parsing would fail or is otherwise unable
to completely parse the lambda-introducer without producing an
irreversible semantic effect.
Mostly NFC, but we should recover marginally better in some error cases
(avoiding duplicate diagnostics).
llvm-svn: 361182
Summary:
This adds a new error for missing parentheses around lambdas in delete operators.
```
int main() {
delete []() { return new int(); }();
}
```
This will result in:
```
test.cpp:2:3: error: '[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:2:9: note: add parentheses around the lambda
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^
( )
```
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36357
llvm-svn: 361119
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
This reinstates r360974, reverted in r360988, with a fix for a
static_assert failure on 32-bit builds: force Type base class to have
8-byte alignment like the rest of Clang's AST nodes.
llvm-svn: 360995
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
llvm-svn: 360974
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
(and less wrong).
It's not correct to assume that X<something, Type> is always a
template-id; there are a few cases where the comma takes us into a
non-expression syntactic context in which 'Type' might be permissible.
Stop doing that.
This slightly regresses our error recovery on the cases where the
construct is intended to be a template-id. We typically do still manage
to diagnose a missing 'template' keyword, but we realize this too late
to properly recover from the error.
This fixes a regression introduced by r360308.
llvm-svn: 360827
This can be used for better support of `-fno-gnu-inline-asm` builds.
rdar://problem/49540880
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: eraman, jkorous, dexonsmith, craig.topper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61619
llvm-svn: 360625
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Summary:
- For template arguments ending with `>>>`, we should cease lookahead
and treat it as type-id firstly, so that deduction could work
properly.
Reviewers: tra, yaxunl
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61396
llvm-svn: 360214
Keep looking for decl-specifiers after an unknown identifier. Don't
issue diagnostics about an error type specifier conflicting with later
type specifiers.
llvm-svn: 360117
The parser was dealing with unexpected "template" keywords after "using"
keywords too late and putting the parser into the wrong state, which could
lead to a crash down the line. This change allows the parser to consume the
bad "template" keywords earlier, and continue parsing as if "template" was
never there to begin with for better error recovery.
llvm-svn: 359740
Clang emits a warning when using a pure specifier =0 in a function definition
at class scope (a MS-specific construct), when using -fms-extensions.
However, to detect this, it was using FD->isCanonicalDecl() on function
declaration, which was also detecting out-of-class definition of member
functions of class templates. Fix this by using !FD->isOutOfLine() instead.
Fixes PR21334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29707
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Reviewers: rnk, riccibruno
Patch By: Rudy Pons
llvm-svn: 358849
We want to make objc_nonlazy_class apply to implementations, but ran into this.
There doesn't seem to be any reason that this isn't supported.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60542
llvm-svn: 358200
For backwards compatibility we allow alternative spelling of address
spaces - 'private', 'local', 'global', 'constant', 'generic'.
In order to accept 'private' correctly, parsing has been changed to
understand different use cases - access specifier vs address space.
Fixes PR40707 and PR41011!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59603
llvm-svn: 356888
This adds support for static_assert() (and _Static_assert()) in
@interface/@implementation ivar lists and in @interface method declarations.
It was already supported in @implementation blocks outside of the ivar lists.
The assert AST nodes are added at file scope, matching where other
(non-Objective-C) declarations at @interface / @implementation level go (cf
`allTUVariables`).
Also add a `__has_feature(objc_c_static_assert)` that's true in C11 (and
`__has_extension(objc_c_static_assert)` that's always true) and
`__has_feature(objc_cxx_static_assert)` that's true in C++11 modea fter this
patch, so it's possible to check if this is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59223
llvm-svn: 356148
Previously, we parsed it only in the top level, which excludes namespaces and
extern "C" blocks.
rdar://problem/48818890
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59282
llvm-svn: 356075
This patch adds #pragma clang loop pipeline and #pragma clang loop pipeline_initiation_interval for debugging or reducing compile time purposes. It is possible to disable SWP for concrete loops to save compilation time or to find bugs by not doing SWP to certain loops. It is possible to set value of initiation interval to concrete number to save compilation time by not doing extra pipeliner passes or to check created schedule for specific initiation interval.
Patch by Alexey Lapshin.
llvm-svn: 350414
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.
This patch fixes PR39837.
llvm-svn: 350404
Namespaces are introduced by adding an "identifier." before a
push/pop directive. Pop directives with namespaces can only pop a
attribute group that was pushed with the same namespace. Push and pop
directives that don't opt into namespaces have the same semantics.
This is necessary to prevent a pitfall of using multiple #pragma
clang attribute directives spread out in a large file, particularly
when macros are involved. It isn't easy to see which pop corripsonds
to which push, so its easy to inadvertently pop the wrong group.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55628
llvm-svn: 349845
This moves everything primarily testing the functionality of -ast-dump and -ast-print into their own directory, rather than leaving the tests spread around the testing directory.
llvm-svn: 348017
Only push the outermost record as a DeclContext when parsing a function
body. See the comments in Sema::getContainingDC about the way the parser
pushes contexts. This is intended to match the behavior the parser
normally displays where it parses all method bodies from all nested
classes at the end of the outermost class, when all nested classes are
complete.
Fixes PR38460.
llvm-svn: 347627
Summary:
clang has `-Wextra-semi` (D43162), which is not dictated by the currently selected standard.
While that is great, there is at least one more source of need-less semis - 'null statements'.
Sometimes, they are needed:
```
for(int x = 0; continueToDoWork(x); x++)
; // Ugly code, but the semi is needed here.
```
But sometimes they are just there for no reason:
```
switch(X) {
case 0:
return -2345;
case 5:
return 0;
default:
return 42;
}; // <- oops
;;;;;;;;;;; <- OOOOPS, still not diagnosed. Clearly this is junk.
```
Additionally:
```
if(; // <- empty init-statement
true)
;
switch (; // empty init-statement
x) {
...
}
for (; // <- empty init-statement
int y : S())
;
}
As usual, things may or may not go sideways in the presence of macros.
While evaluating this diag on my codebase of interest, it was unsurprisingly
discovered that Google Test macros are *very* prone to this.
And it seems many issues are deep within the GTest itself, not
in the snippets passed from the codebase that uses GTest.
So after some thought, i decided not do issue a diagnostic if the semi
is within *any* macro, be it either from the normal header, or system header.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 | PR39111 ]]
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, efriedma
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52695
llvm-svn: 347339
Apparently my invocation of clang-format in VIM didn't get this right,
but the patch-version DID. This patch just runs CF on this file.
Change-Id: Ied462a2d921cbb813fa427740d3ef6e97959b56d
llvm-svn: 346696
As approved for the Working Paper in San Diego, support annotating
inline namespaces with 'inline'.
Change-Id: I51a654e11ffb475bf27cccb2458768151619e384
llvm-svn: 346677
Currently, we only accept clang as the scoped attribute identifier for double square bracket attributes provided by Clang, but this has the potential to conflict with user-defined macros. To help alleviate these concerns, this introduces the _Clang scoped attribute identifier as an alias for clang. It also introduces a warning with a fixit on the off chance someone attempts to use __clang__ as the scoped attribute (which is a predefined compiler identification macro).
llvm-svn: 346521
This reverts commit r345487, which reverted r345486. I think the crashes were
caused by an OOM on the builder, trying again to confirm...
llvm-svn: 345517
This commit enables pushing an empty #pragma clang attribute push, then adding
multiple attributes to it, then popping them all with #pragma clang attribute
pop, just like #pragma clang diagnostic. We still support the current way of
adding these, #pragma clang attribute push(__attribute__((...))), by treating it
like a combined push/attribute. This is needed to create macros like:
DO_SOMETHING_BEGIN(attr1, attr2, attr3)
// ...
DO_SOMETHING_END
rdar://45496947
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53621
llvm-svn: 345486
We need to consider all tokens that start with '>' when
we're checking for the end of an empty template argument list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52321
llvm-svn: 342752
Summary:
We previously disallowed use of undocumented attributes with #pragma clang
attribute, but the justification for doing so was weak and it prevented many
reasonable use cases.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk, benlangmuir, dexonsmith, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51507
llvm-svn: 341437
expression
Clang emits invalid protocol metadata when a @protocol expression is used with a
forward-declared protocol. The protocol metadata is missing protocol conformance
list of the protocol since we don't have access to the definition of it in the
compiled translation unit. The linker then might end up picking the invalid
metadata when linking which will lead to incorrect runtime protocol conformance
checks.
This commit makes sure that Clang fails to compile code that uses a @protocol
expression with a forward-declared protocol. This ensures that Clang does not
emit invalid protocol metadata. I added an extra assert in CodeGen to ensure
that this kind of issue won't happen in other places.
rdar://32787811
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49462
llvm-svn: 340102
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 338800
This adds support for the unroll_and_jam pragma, to go with the recently
added unroll and jam pass. The name of the pragma is the same as is used
in the Intel compiler, and most of the code works the same as for unroll.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam has been separated into a different
patch. This part adds #pragma unroll_and_jam with an optional count, and
#pragma no_unroll_and_jam to disable the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47267
llvm-svn: 338566
Summary:
This patch allows the parsing of a postfix expression involving a fold expression, which is legal as a fold-expression is a primary-expression.
See also https://llvm.org/pr38282
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49848
llvm-svn: 338170
Check each case value in turn while parsing it, performing the
conversion to the switch type within the context of the expression
itself. This will become necessary in order to properly handle cleanups
for temporaries created as part of the case label (in an upcoming
patch). For now it's just good hygiene.
This necessitates moving the checking for the switch condition itself to
earlier, so that the destination type is available when checking the
case labels.
As a nice side-effect, we get slightly improved diagnostic quality and
error recovery by separating the case expression checking from the case
statement checking and from tracking whether there are discarded case
labels.
llvm-svn: 338056
Richard Smith