Its number of optional parameters has grown too large,
which makes adding new optional parameters quite a chore.
Fix this by using an options struct.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120380
Rename MLIR CAPI ExecutionEngine target for consistency:
MLIRCEXECUTIONENGINE -> MLIRCAPIExecutionEngine in line with other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114596
The purpose of the change is to make clear whether the user is
retrieving the original function or the wrapper function, in line with
the invoke commands. This new functionality is useful for users that
already have defined their own packed interface, so they do not want the
extra layer of indirection, or for users wanting to the look at the
resulting primary function rather than the wrapper function.
All locations, except the python bindings now have a `lookupPacked`
method that matches the original `lookup` functionality. `lookup`
still exists, but with new semantics.
- `lookup` returns the function with a given name. If `bool f(int,int)`
is compiled, `lookup` will return a reference to `bool(*f)(int,int)`.
- `lookupPacked` returns the packed wrapper of the function with the
given name. If `bool f(int,int)` is compiled, `lookupPacked` will return
`void(*mlir_f)(void**)`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114352
Per discussion on discord and various feature requests across bindings (Haskell and Rust bindings authors have asked me directly), we should be building a link-ready MLIR-C dylib which exports the C API and can be used without linking to anything else.
This patch:
* Adds a new MLIR-C aggregate shared library (libMLIR-C.so), which is similar in name and function to libLLVM-C.so.
* It is guarded by the new CMake option MLIR_BUILD_MLIR_C_DYLIB, which has a similar purpose/name to the LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_C_DYLIB option.
* On all platforms, this will work with both static, BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, and libMLIR builds, if supported:
* In static builds: libMLIR-C.so will export the CAPI symbols and statically link all dependencies into itself.
* In BUILD_SHARED_LIBS: libMLIR-C.so will export the CAPI symbols and have dynamic dependencies on implementation shared libraries.
* In libMLIR.so mode: same as static. libMLIR.so was not finished for actual linking use within the project. An eventual relayering so that libMLIR-C.so depends on libMLIR.so is possible but requires first re-engineering the latter to use the aggregate facility.
* On Linux, exported symbols are filtered to only the CAPI. On others (MacOS, Windows), all symbols are exported. A CMake status is printed unless if global visibility is hidden indicating that this has not yet been implemented. The library should still work, but it will be larger and more likely to conflict until fixed. Someone should look at lifting the corresponding support from libLLVM-C.so and adapting. Or, for special uses, just build with `-DCMAKE_CXX_VISIBILITY_PRESET=hidden -DCMAKE_C_VISIBILITY_PRESET=hidden`.
* Includes fixes to execution engine symbol export macros to enable default visibility. Without this, the advice to use hidden visibility would have resulted in test failures and unusable execution engine support libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113731
Add support to Python bindings for the MLIR execution engine to load a
specified list of shared libraries - for eg. to use MLIR runtime
utility libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104009
Provide an option to specify optimization level when creating an
ExecutionEngine via the MLIR JIT Python binding. Not only is the
specified optimization level used for code generation, but all LLVM
optimization passes at the optimization level are also run prior to
machine code generation (akin to the mlir-cpu-runner tool).
Default opt level continues to remain at level two (-O2).
Contributions in part from Prashant Kumar <prashantk@polymagelabs.com>
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102551
This exposes the ability to register Python functions with the JIT and
exposes them to the MLIR jitted code. The provided test case illustrates
the mechanism.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99562
There is no need for the interface implementations to be exposed, opaque
registration functions are sufficient for all users, similarly to passes.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97852
This offers the ability to create a JIT and invoke a function by passing
ctypes pointers to the argument and the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97523
This adds minimalistic bindings for the execution engine, allowing to
invoke the JIT from the C API. This is still quite early and
experimental and shouldn't be considered stable in any way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96651
Emilio Cota