At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
As proposed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106640.html
This is for a couple of reasons:
- Values of type PointerType are unlike the other SequentialTypes (arrays
and vectors) in that they do not hold values of the element type. By moving
PointerType we can unify certain aspects of how the other SequentialTypes
are handled.
- PointerType will have no place in the SequentialType hierarchy once
pointee types are removed, so this is a necessary step towards removing
pointee types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26595
llvm-svn: 288462
Summary:
Split ReaderWriter.h which contains the APIs into both the BitReader and
BitWriter libraries into BitcodeReader.h and BitcodeWriter.h.
This is to address Chandler's concern about sharing the same API header
between multiple libraries (BitReader and BitWriter). That concern is
why we create a single bitcode library in our downstream build of clang,
which led to r286297 being reverted as it added a dependency that
created a cycle only when there is a single bitcode library (not two as
in upstream).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: dlj, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26502
llvm-svn: 286566
Summary:
This kill various depreacated API related to attribute :
- The deprecated C API attribute based on LLVMAttribute enum.
- The Raw attribute set format (planned to be removed in 4.0).
Reviewers: bkramer, echristo, mehdi_amini, void
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23039
llvm-svn: 286062
Summary:
These are analog to the existing LLVMConstExactSDiv and LLVMBuildExactSDiv
functions.
Reviewers: deadalnix, majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25259
llvm-svn: 283269
End iterators are usually sentinels, not actually Instruction* at all.
Stop casting to it just to get an iterator back.
There is likely no observable functionality change here right now
(although this is relying on UB, I doubt it was triggering anything),
but I'll be removing the cast soon.
llvm-svn: 278346
Summary: As per title. This completes the C API Attribute support.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21365
llvm-svn: 272811
If a local_unnamed_addr attribute is attached to a global, the address
is known to be insignificant within the module. It is distinct from the
existing unnamed_addr attribute in that it only describes a local property
of the module rather than a global property of the symbol.
This attribute is intended to be used by the code generator and LTO to allow
the linker to decide whether the global needs to be in the symbol table. It is
possible to exclude a global from the symbol table if three things are true:
- This attribute is present on every instance of the global (which means that
the normal rule that the global must have a unique address can be broken without
being observable by the program by performing comparisons against the global's
address)
- The global has linkonce_odr linkage (which means that each linkage unit must have
its own copy of the global if it requires one, and the copy in each linkage unit
must be the same)
- It is a constant or a function (which means that the program cannot observe that
the unique-address rule has been broken by writing to the global)
Although this attribute could in principle be computed from the module
contents, LTO clients (i.e. linkers) will normally need to be able to compute
this property as part of symbol resolution, and it would be inefficient to
materialize every module just to compute it.
See:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160509/356401.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160516/356738.html
for earlier discussion.
Part of the fix for PR27553.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20348
llvm-svn: 272709
Summary: This also deprecated the get attribute function familly.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: axw, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19181
llvm-svn: 272504
Summary: This needs to get in before anything is released concerning attribute. If the old name gets in the wild, then we are stuck with it forever. Putting it in its own diff should getting that part at least in fast.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20417
llvm-svn: 270452
Summary:
LLVMAttribute has outlived its utility and is becoming a problem for C API users that what to use all the LLVM attributes. In order to help moving away from LLVMAttribute in a smooth manner, this diff introduce LLVMGetAttrKindIDInContext, which can be used instead of the enum values.
See D18749 for reference.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19081
llvm-svn: 266842
The only use for getGlobalContext() is in the C API.
Let's just move the static global here and nuke the C++ API.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19094
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266380
Summary: LLVMAttribute has outlived its utility and is becoming a problem for C API users that what to use all the LLVM attributes. In order to help moving away from LLVMAttribute in a smooth manner, this diff introduce LLVMGetAttrKindIDInContext, which can be used instead of the enum values.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18749
llvm-svn: 266257
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Summary: Also expose getters and setters in the C API, so that the change can be tested.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, axw, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18260
From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
llvm-svn: 263886
Summary: As per title. There was a lot of part missing in the C API, so I had to extend the invoke and landingpad API.
Reviewers: echristo, joker.eph, Wallbraker
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17359
llvm-svn: 261254
Summary: The name is confusing as it matche another method on the module.
Reviewers: joker.eph, Wallbraker, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17283
llvm-svn: 260920
Summary: This required to add binding to Instruction::removeFromParent so that instruction can be forward declared and then moved at the right place.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc, echristo, dblaikie, joker.eph, Wallbraker
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17057
llvm-svn: 260597
Summary: As per title. This also include extra support for insertvalue and extracvalue.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc, echristo, dblaikie, joker.eph, Wallbraker
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17055
llvm-svn: 260335
Summary: As per title. This remove the need to rely on internal knowledge of call and invoke instruction to find called value and argument count.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc, echristo, dblaikie, joker.eph, Wallbraker
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17054
llvm-svn: 260332
Summary: As per title. Also add a facility method to get the name of a basic block from the C API.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc, echristo, dblaikie, joker.eph, Wallbraker
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16912
llvm-svn: 260309
This remove the need for locking when deleting a function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15988
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 257139
Stop converting implicitly between iterators and pointers/references in
lib/IR. For convenience, I've added a `getIterator()` accessor to
`ilist_node` so that callers don't need to know how to spell the
iterator class (i.e., they can use `X.getIterator()` instead of
`Function::iterator(X)`).
I'll eventually disallow these implicit conversions entirely, but
there's a lot of code, so it doesn't make sense to do it all in one
patch. One library or so at a time.
Why? To root out cases of `getNextNode()` and `getPrevNode()` being
used in iterator logic. The design of `ilist` makes that invalid when
the current node could be at the back of the list, but it happens to
"work" right now because of a bug where those functions never return
`nullptr` if you're using a half-node sentinel. Before I can fix the
function, I have to remove uses of it that rely on it misbehaving.
(Maybe the function should just be deleted anyway? But I don't want
deleting it -- potentially a huge project -- to block fixing
ilist/iplist.)
llvm-svn: 249782
This was a flawed change - it just caused the getElementType call to be
deferred until later, when we really need to remove it. Now that the IR
for GlobalAliases has been updated, the root cause is addressed that way
instead and this change is no longer needed (and in fact gets in the way
- because we want to pass the pointee type directly down further).
Follow up patches to push this through GlobalValue, bitcode format, etc,
will come along soon.
This reverts commit 236160.
llvm-svn: 247585
This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types".
The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value
whose provenance cannot be obscured.
There are several applications for such a type but my immediate
motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a
single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of
optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry
block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two
cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands
inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we
came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of
BasicBlocks.
Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point"
and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad
yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret.
The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the
Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two
points.
What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already
paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we
are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for
such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer
that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me
the impression that this will not be heroic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861
llvm-svn: 245029
Revert the changes to the C API LLVMBuildLandingPad that were part of
the personality function move. We now set the personality on the parent
function when the C API attempts to construct a landingpad with a
personality.
This reverts commit r240010.
llvm-svn: 242372
Summary:
The capability was lost with D10429 where the personality function was set at function level rather than landing pad level. Now there is no way to get/set the personality function from the C API. That is a problem.
Note that the whole thing could be avoided by improving the C API testing, as started by D10725
Reviewers: chandlerc, bogner, majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rafael, rnk, axw
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10946
llvm-svn: 242104
Stephan Bergmann