The VLLDM and VLSTM instructions are incompletely specified. They
(potentially) write (or read, respectively) registers Q0-Q7, VPR, and
FPSCR, but the compiler is unaware of it.
In the new test case `cmse-vlldm-no-reorder.ll` case the compiler
missed an anti-dependency and reordered a `VLLDM` ahead of the
instruction, which stashed the return value from the non-secure call,
effectively clobbering said value.
This test case does not fail with upstream LLVM, because of scheduling
differences and I couldn't find a test case for the VLSTM either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81586
Momchil Velikov