Currently Sema/wchar.c fails because WCHAR_T_TYPE is defined as int,
however on ARM wchar_t is unsigned int.
This patch changes that, so this test passes for ARM.
Patch by Joey Gouly!
llvm-svn: 164598
deprecation attribute ('deprecated', 'availability' or 'unavailable').
This warning is under a separate flag, -Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync, so it
can be turned off easily while leaving other -Wdocumentation warnings on.
llvm-svn: 164467
This is some really old code (took me a while to find the test cases) & the
diagnostic text is slightly incorrect (it should really only apply to
re/declarations/, redefinitions are an error regardless of whether the types
match). Not sure if anyone cares about it, though.
For now this just makes the diagnostic more clear in less obvious cases where
the type of a declaration might not be explicitly written (eg: because it
uses decltype)
llvm-svn: 164313
is no compelling argument that this is a generally useful warning,
and imposes a strong stylistic argument on code beyond what it was
intended to find warnings in.
llvm-svn: 164083
should be fine to use it without further explanations in the attached
paragraph, so the warning about empty paragraph was turned off for it.
llvm-svn: 163836
for halting the propagation of uninitialized value tracking along
a path. Unlike __attribute__((noreturn)), this attribute (which
is used by clients of the static analyzer) can be used to annotate
functions that essentially never return, but in rare cares may be
allowed to return for (special) debugging purposes. This attribute
has been shown in reducing false positives in the static analyzer
by pruning false postives, and is equally applicable here.
Handling this attribute in the CFG itself is another option, but
this is not something all clients (e.g., possibly -Wunreachable-code)
would want to see.
Addresses <rdar://problem/12281583>.
llvm-svn: 163681
analysis registers a command, it becomes a "known" command for the lexer, since
it has an ID. Having this freedom of choice to register a command is a good
thing since BriefParser does not need this.
But the parser should still invoke the correct semantic analysis method
(actOnUnknownCommand) in this case.
llvm-svn: 163646
- format specifies type 'wchar_t **' (aka 'int **') but the argument has type 'float *'
- format specifies type 'wchar_t **' (aka 'unsigned short **') but the argument has type 'float *'
llvm-svn: 163468
of a c-function for what it is. Otherwise, this func
is treated as an overloadable c-function resulting in
a crash much later. // rdar://11743706
llvm-svn: 163224
initiated enum constant has the same value as another enum constant.
For instance:
enum test { A, B, C = -1, D, E = 1 };
Clang will warn that:
A and D both have value 0
B and E both have value 1
A few exceptions are made to keep the noise down. Enum constants which are
initialized to another enum constant, or an enum constant plus or minus 1 will
not trigger this warning. Also, anonymous enums are not checked.
llvm-svn: 162938
This makes Clang produce an error for code such as:
__thread int x;
int *p = &x;
The lvalue of a thread-local variable cannot be evaluated at compile
time.
llvm-svn: 162835
name. This should reduce the amount of warning false positives about bad HTML
in comments when the comment author intended to put a reference to a template.
This change will also enable us parse the comment as intended in these cases.
Fixes part 1 of PR13374.
llvm-svn: 162407
specifier is unsed in a declaration; as it may not make the symbol
local to linkage unit as intended. Suggest using "hidden" visibility
attribute instead. // rdar://7703982
llvm-svn: 162138
function arguments and arguments for variadic functions are of a particular
type which is determined by some other argument to the same function call.
Usecases include:
* MPI library implementations, where these attributes enable checking that
buffer type matches the passed MPI_Datatype;
* for HDF5 library there is a similar usecase as MPI;
* checking types of variadic functions' arguments for functions like
fcntl() and ioctl().
llvm-svn: 162067
as it does something unexpected (but gcc compatible).
Suggest use of __attribute__((visibility("hidden")))
on declaration instead. // rdar://7703982
llvm-svn: 161972
The reason for the recent fallout for "attaching comments to any redeclaration"
change are two false assumptions:
(1) a RawComment is attached to a single decl (not true for 'typedef struct X *Y'
where we want the comment to be attached to both X and Y);
(2) the whole redeclaration chain has only a single comment (obviously false, the
user can put a separate comment for each redeclaration).
To fix (1) I revert the part of the recent change where a 'Decl*' member was
introduced to RawComment. Now ASTContext has a separate DenseMap for mapping
'Decl*' to 'FullComment*'.
To fix (2) I just removed the test with this assumption. We might not parse
every comment in redecl chain if we already parsed at least one.
llvm-svn: 161878
'templated' declaration for a function or class template to refer to
the function or class template itself, to which the documentation will
be attached. Fixes PR13593.
llvm-svn: 161762
are not definitions. This follows the behavior of both gcc and earlier
versions of clang. Regression from r156531. <rdar://problem/12048621>.
llvm-svn: 161523
The implementation also includes a Relax NG schema and tests for the schema
itself. The schema is used in c-index-test to verify that XML documents we
produce are valid. In order to do the validation, we add an optional libxml2
dependency for c-index-test.
Credits for CMake part go to Doug Gregor. Credits for Autoconf part go to Eric
Christopher. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 161431
This is useful for example for %n in printf, which expects
a pointer to int with the same logic for checking as %d
would have in scanf.
llvm-svn: 161407
Doxygen manual claims that multiple \brief or \returns commands will be merged
together, but actual behavior is different (second \brief command becomes a
part of a discussion, second \returns becomes a "Returns: blah" paragraph on
its own). Anyway, it seems to be a bad idea to use multiple \brief or \returns
commands in a single command.
llvm-svn: 161325
The only caveat is renumbering CXCommentKind enum for aesthetic reasons -- this
breaks libclang binary compatibility, but should not be a problem since API is
so new.
This also fixes PR13372 as a side-effect.
llvm-svn: 161087
While '%n' can be used for evil in an attacker-controlled format string, there
isn't any acute danger in using it in a literal format string with an argument
of the appropriate type.
llvm-svn: 160984
Clang's -Wformat fix-its currently suggest using "%zu" for values of
type size_t (in C99 or C++11 mode). However, for a type such as
std::vector<T>::size_type, it does not notice that type is actually
typedeffed to size_t, and instead suggests a format for the underlying
type, such as "%lu" or "%u".
This commit makes the format string fix mechanism walk the typedef chain
so that it notices if the type is size_t, even if that isn't "at the
top".
llvm-svn: 160886
This tests for the ability to include a "message" field in availability
attributes, like so:
extern void ATSFontGetName(const char *oName)
__attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0,
message="use CTFontCopyFullName")));
This was actually supported in Clang 3.1, but we got a request for a
__has_feature so that header files can use this more safely. It's
unfortunate that the 3.1 release doesn't include this, however.
<rdar://problem/11886458>
llvm-svn: 160699
short-circuiting when building the CFG. Also be sure to skip parens before
checking for the && / || special cases. Finally, fix some crashes in CFG
printing in the presence of calls to destructors for array of array of class
type.
llvm-svn: 160691
variables that have static storage duration, it removes debug info on the
emitted initializer function but not all debug info about this variable.
llvm-svn: 160659
The assertion was wrong in case we have a verbatim block without a closing
command.
Also add tests for closing command name in a verbatim block, since now it can
be empty in such cases.
llvm-svn: 160568
* Treat compound assignment as a use, at Jordy's request.
* Always add compound assignments into the CFG, so we can correctly diagnose the use in 'return x += 1;'
llvm-svn: 160334
use out of TransferFunctions, and compute it in advance rather than on-the-fly.
This allows us to handle compound assignments with DeclRefExprs on the RHS
correctly, and also makes it trivial to treat const& function parameters as not
initializing the argument. The patch also makes both of those changes.
llvm-svn: 160330
struct __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) zed {
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) zed;
Which is a bit silly and got a lot noisier now that we correctly handle
visibility pragmas. This patch fixes that and also has some extra quality
improvements:
* We now produce an error instead of a warning for
struct __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) zed {
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) zed;
* The "after definition" warning now points to the new attribute that is
ignored instead of pointing to the declaration.
llvm-svn: 160227
instead push the terminator for the branch down into the basic blocks of the subexpressions of '&&' and '||'
respectively. This eliminates some artifical control-flow from the CFG and results in a more
compact CFG.
Note that this patch only alters the branches 'while', 'if' and 'for'. This was complex enough for
one patch. The remaining branches (e.g., do...while) can be handled in a separate patch, but they
weren't immediately tackled because they were less important.
It is possible that this patch introduces some subtle bugs, particularly w.r.t. to destructor placement.
I've tried to audit these changes, but it is also known that the destructor logic needs some refinement
in the area of '||' and '&&' regardless (i.e., their are known bugs).
llvm-svn: 160218
diagnostics implemented -- see testcases.
I created a new TableGen file for comment diagnostics,
DiagnosticCommentKinds.td, because comment diagnostics don't logically
fit into AST diagnostics file. But I don't feel strongly about it.
This also implements support for self-closing HTML tags in comment
lexer and parser (for example, <br />).
In order to issue precise diagnostics CommentSema needs to know the
declaration the comment is attached to. There is no easy way to find a decl by
comment, so we match comments and decls in lockstep: after parsing one
declgroup we check if we have any new, not yet attached comments. If we do --
then we do the usual comment-finding process.
It is interesting that this automatically handles trailing comments.
We pick up not only comments that precede the declaration, but also
comments that *follow* the declaration -- thanks to the lookahead in
the lexer: after parsing the declgroup we've consumed the semicolon
and looked ahead through comments.
Added -Wdocumentation-html flag for semantic HTML errors to allow the user to
disable only HTML warnings (but not HTML parse errors, which we emit as
warnings in -Wdocumentation).
llvm-svn: 160078
This behaves like the existing GNU __alignof and C++11 alignof keywords;
most of the patch is simply adding the third token spelling to various places.
llvm-svn: 159494
This adds support for the tls_model attribute. This allows the user to
choose a TLS model that is better than what LLVM would select by
default. For example, a variable might be declared as:
__thread int x __attribute__((tls_model("initial-exec")));
if it will not be used in a shared library that is dlopen'ed.
This depends on LLVM r159077.
llvm-svn: 159078
Also, don't warn if the used function is __attribute__((const)), in which case
it's not supposed to use global variables anyway.
The inline-in-inline thing is a heuristic, and one that's possibly incorrect
fairly often because the function being inlined could definitely use global
variables. However, even some C standard library functions are written using
other (trivial) static-inline functions in the headers, and we definitely don't
want to be warning on that (or on anything that /uses/ these trivial inline
functions). So we're using "inlined" as a marker for "fairly trivial".
(Note that __attribute__((pure)) does /not/ guarantee safety like ((const),
because ((const)) does not guarantee that global variables are not being used,
and the warning is about globals not being shared across TUs.)
llvm-svn: 158898
Now that this is a C-only warning, we can use "static" instead of "internal
linkage", which is a term developers are probably more familiar with.
This makes for a better warning message. The warning name was changed to match,
since "internal linkage" is not mentioned in the warning text anymore.
llvm-svn: 158853
The original r158700 caused crashes in the gcc test suite,
g++.abi/vtable3a.C among others. It also caused failures in the libc++
test suite.
llvm-svn: 158749
Per post-commit review, it's not appropriate to use ExtWarn in C++, because
we can't prove that the inline function will actually be defined in more than
one place (and thus we can't prove that this violates the ODR).
This removes the warning entirely from uses in the main source file in C++.
llvm-svn: 158689
This includes treating anonymous namespaces like internal linkage, and allowing
const variables to be used even if internal. The whole thing's been broken out
into a separate function to avoid nested ifs.
llvm-svn: 158683
This handles the very common case of people writing inline functions in their
main source files and not tagging them as inline. These cases should still
behave as the user intended. (The diagnostic is still emitted as an extension.)
I'm reworking this code anyway to account for C++'s equivalent restriction in
[basic.def.odr]p6, but this should get some bots back to green.
llvm-svn: 158666
This is explicitly forbidden in C99 6.7.4p3. This is /not/ forbidden in C++,
probably because by default file-scope const/constexpr variables have internal
linkage, while functions have external linkage. There's also the issue of
anonymous namespaces to consider. Nevertheless, there should probably be a
similar warning, since the semantics of inlining a function that references
a variable with internal linkage do not seem well-defined.
<rdar://problem/11577619>
llvm-svn: 158531
In standard C since C89, a 'translation-unit' is syntactically defined to have
at least one "external-declaration", which is either a decl or a function
definition. In Clang the latter gives us a declaration as well.
The tricky bit about this warning is that our predefines can contain external
declarations (__builtin_va_list and the 128-bit integer types). Therefore our
AST parser now makes sure we have at least one declaration that doesn't come
from the predefines buffer.
Also, remove bogus warning about empty source files. This doesn't catch source
files that only contain comments, and never fired anyway because of our
predefines.
PR12665 and <rdar://problem/9165548>
llvm-svn: 158085
-Wsometimes-uninitialized diagnostics to make it clearer that the cause
of the issue may be a condition which must always evaluate to true or
false, rather than an uninitialized variable.
To emphasize this, add a new note with a fixit which removes the
impossible condition or replaces it with a constant.
Also, downgrade the diagnostic from -Wsometimes-uninitialized to
-Wconditional-uninitialized when it applies to a range-based for loop,
since the condition is not written explicitly in the code in that case.
llvm-svn: 157511
-Wsometimes-uninitialized. This detects cases where an explicitly-written branch
inevitably leads to an uninitialized variable use (so either the branch is dead
code or there is an uninitialized use bug).
This chunk of warnings tentatively lives within -Wuninitialized, in order to
give it more visibility to existing Clang users.
llvm-svn: 157458
about argument type mismatch.
This gives a nicer diagnostic in cases like
printf(fmt,
i);
where previously the snippet just pointed at 'fmt' (with a note at the
definition of fmt).
It's a wash for cases like
printf("%f",
i);
where previously we snippeted the offending portion of the format string,
but didn't indicate which argument was at fault.
llvm-svn: 156968
Moves the bool bail-out down a little in SemaChecking - so now
-Wnull-conversion and -Wliteral-conversion can fire when the target type is
bool.
Also improve the wording/details in the -Wliteral-conversion warning to match
the -Wconstant-conversion.
llvm-svn: 156826
Currently cold functions are marked with the "optsize" attribute in CodeGen
so they are always optimized for size. The hot attribute is just ignored,
LLVM doesn't have a way to express hotness at the moment.
llvm-svn: 156723
__attribute__((aligned)). Fixes <rdar://problem/11435441>, a
regression I introduced in r156003. This is the narrow fix; a more
comprehensive fix is coming.
llvm-svn: 156657
// FIXME: This needs to happen before we merge declarations. Then,
// let attribute merging cope with attribute conflicts.
This was already being done for variables, but for functions we were merging
then first and then applying the attributes. To avoid duplicating merging
logic, some of the helpers in SemaDeclAttr.cpp become methods that can
handle merging two attributes in one decl or inheriting attributes from one
decl to another.
With this change we are now able to produce errors for variables with
incompatible visibility attributes or warn about unused dllimports in
variables.
This changes the attribute list iteration back to being in reverse source
code order, as that matches what decl merging does and avoids differentiating
the two cases is the merge*Attr methods.
llvm-svn: 156531
For "%hhx", printf expects an unsigned char. This makes Clang
accept a 'char' argument for that also when using -funsigned-char.
This fixes PR12761.
llvm-svn: 156388
match gcc behavior for two conflicting visibilities in the same decl. It also
makes handling of dllimport/dllexport more natural.
As a bonus we now warn on the dllimport in
void __attribute__((dllimport)) foo13();
void __attribute__((dllexport)) foo13();
as does gcc.
llvm-svn: 156343
for having a uniform logic for adding attributes to a decl. This in turn
is needed to fix the FIXME:
// FIXME: This needs to happen before we merge declarations. Then,
// let attribute merging cope with attribute conflicts.
ProcessDeclAttributes(S, NewFD, D,
/*NonInheritable=*/false, /*Inheritable=*/true);
The idea is that mergeAvailabilityAttr will become a method. Once attributes
are processed before merging, it will be called from handleAvailabilityAttr to
handle multiple attributes in one decl:
void f(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,deprecated=3.0),
availability(ios,introduced=2.0)));
and from SemaDecl.cpp to handle multiple decls:
void f(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,deprecated=3.0)));
void f(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,introduced=2.0)));
As a bonus, use the new structure to diagnose incompatible availability
attributes added to different decls (see included testcases).
llvm-svn: 156269
Teach ASTContext about WIntType, and have it taken from TargetInfo like WCharType. Should fix test/Sema/format-strings.c for ARM, with the exception of one subtest which will fail if wint_t and wchar_t are the same size and wint_t is signed, wchar_t is unsigned.
There'll be a followup commit to fix that.
Reviewed by Chandler and Hans at http://llvm.org/reviews/r/8
llvm-svn: 156165
#define TEST int y; int x = y;
void foo() {
TEST
}
-Wuninitialized gives this warning:
invalid-loc.cc:4:3: warning: variable 'y' is uninitialized when used here
[-Wuninitialized]
TEST
^~~~
invalid-loc.cc:2:29: note: expanded from macro 'TEST'
#define TEST int y; int x = y;
^
note: initialize the variable 'y' to silence this warning
1 warning generated.
The second note lacks filename, line number, and code snippet. This change
will remove the fixit and only point to variable declaration.
invalid-loc.cc:4:3: warning: variable 'y' is uninitialized when used here
[-Wuninitialized]
TEST
^~~~
invalid-loc.cc:2:29: note: expanded from macro 'TEST'
#define TEST int y; int x = y;
^
invalid-loc.cc:4:3: note: variable 'y' is declared here
TEST
^
invalid-loc.cc:2:14: note: expanded from macro 'TEST'
#define TEST int y; int x = y;
^
1 warning generated.
llvm-svn: 156045
i32 __builtin_annotation(i32, string);
Applying it to i64 (e.g., long long) generates the following IR.
trunc i64 {{.*}} to i32
call i32 @llvm.annotation.i32
zext i32 {{.*}} to i64
The redundant truncation and extension make the result difficult to use.
This patch makes __builtin_annotation() generic.
type __builtin_annotation(type, string);
For the i64 example, it simplifies the generated IR to:
call i64 @llvm.annotation.i64
Patch by Xi Wang!
llvm-svn: 155764
Passing -verify to clang without -cc1 or -Xclang silently passes (with a
printed warning, but lit doesn't care about that). This change adds -cc1 or,
as is necessary in one case, -Xclang to fix this so that these tests are
actually verifying as intended.
I'd like to change the driver so this kind of mistake could not be made, but
I'm not entirely sure how. Further, since the driver only warns about unknown
flags in general, we could have similar bugs with a misspellings of arguments
that would be nice to find.
llvm-svn: 154776
__atomic_test_and_set, __atomic_clear, plus a pile of undocumented __GCC_*
predefined macros.
Implement library fallback for __atomic_is_lock_free and
__c11_atomic_is_lock_free, and implement __atomic_always_lock_free.
Contrary to their documentation, GCC's __atomic_fetch_add family don't
multiply the operand by sizeof(T) when operating on a pointer type.
libstdc++ relies on this quirk. Remove this handling for all but the
__c11_atomic_fetch_add and __c11_atomic_fetch_sub builtins.
Contrary to their documentation, __atomic_test_and_set and __atomic_clear
take a first argument of type 'volatile void *', not 'void *' or 'bool *',
and __atomic_is_lock_free and __atomic_always_lock_free have an argument
of type 'const volatile void *', not 'void *'.
With this change, libstdc++4.7's <atomic> passes libc++'s atomic test suite,
except for a couple of libstdc++ bugs and some cases where libc++'s test
suite tests for properties which implementations have latitude to vary.
llvm-svn: 154640
The codepath already only works for source bits > target bits, it's just that
it was testing for the source expr bits to be exactly 64. This meant simple
cases (int i = x_long / 2) were missed & ended up under the general
-Wconversion warning, which a user might not have enabled.
llvm-svn: 154626
This is not quite sufficient for libstdc++'s <atomic>: we still need
__atomic_test_and_set and __atomic_clear, and may need a more complete
__atomic_is_lock_free implementation.
We are also missing an implementation of __atomic_always_lock_free,
__atomic_nand_fetch, and __atomic_fetch_nand, but those aren't needed
for libstdc++.
llvm-svn: 154579
<stdatomic.h> header.
In passing, fix LanguageExtensions to note that C11 and C++11 are no longer
"upcoming standards" but are now actually standardized.
llvm-svn: 154513
This diagnostic seems to be production ready, it's just an oversight that it
wasn't turned on by default.
The test changes are a bit of a mixed bag. Some tests that seemed like they
clearly didn't need to use this behavior have been modified not to use it.
Others that I couldn't be sure about, I added the necessary expected-warnings
to.
It's possible the diagnostic message could be improved to make it clearer that
this warning can be suppressed by using a value that won't lose precision when
converted to the target type (but can still be a floating point literal, such
as "bool b = 1.0;").
llvm-svn: 154068
a type specifier and can be combined with unsigned. This allows libstdc++4.7 to
be used with clang in c++98 mode.
Several other changes are still required for libstdc++4.7 to work with clang in
c++11 mode.
llvm-svn: 153999
non-constant value encountered. This allows the evaluator to deduce that
expressions like (x < 5 || true) is equal to true. Previously, it would visit
x and determined that the entire expression is could not evaluated to a
constant.
This fixes PR12318.
llvm-svn: 153226
This allows us to handle extreme cases of chained binary operators without causing stack
overflow.
The binary operators that are handled with the data recursive evaluator are
comma, logical, or operators that have operands with integral or enumeration type.
Part of rdar://10941790.
llvm-svn: 152819
Err on the side of brevity and rename (while providing aliases for the original
name) -Wbool-conversions, -Wint-conversions, and -Wvector-conversions for
consistency with constant, literal, string, and sign conversion warnings. And
name the diagnostic groups explicitly while I'm here rather than rewriting the
string in the groups and sema td files.
Curiously, vector-conversion is not under -Wconversion. Perhaps it should be.
llvm-svn: 152776
defined here, but not semantically, so
new struct S {};
is always ill-formed, even if there is a struct S in scope.
We also had a couple of bugs in ParseOptionalTypeSpecifier caused by it being
under-loved (due to it only being used in a few places) so merge it into
ParseDeclarationSpecifiers with a new DeclSpecContext. To avoid regressing, this
required improving ParseDeclarationSpecifiers' diagnostics in some cases. This
also required teaching ParseSpecifierQualifierList about constexpr... which
incidentally fixes an issue where we'd allow the constexpr specifier in other
bad places.
llvm-svn: 152549
Before r151307 this part worked without compiler errors but now it only verifies
that our handling of irregular pragmas is broken compared to gcc, it has no
practical usefulness; it creates invalid structs that cannot be used for 'offsetof' testing.
If we later decide to handle irregular pragmas without compiler errors we can
put back this part.
llvm-svn: 152480
basic source character set in C++98. Add -Wc++98-compat diagnostics for same in
literals in C++11. Extend such support to cover string literals as well as
character literals, and mark N2170 as done.
This seems too minor to warrant a release note to me. Let me know if you disagree.
llvm-svn: 152444
This renames the -Wformat-non-standard flag to -Wformat-non-iso,
rewords the current warnings a bit (pointing out that a format string
is not supported by ISO C rather than being "non standard"),
and adds a warning about positional arguments.
llvm-svn: 152403
But it is in the underlying c part of clang. clang crashes
in IRGen when passing an incomplete type argument to
variadic function (instead of diagnosing the bug).
// rdar://10961370
llvm-svn: 151862
The bug that was caught by Apple's internal buildbots was valid and also showed another bug in my implementation.
These are now fixed, with regression tests added to catch them both (not Darwin-specific).
Original log:
====================
Revert r151638 because it causes assertion hit on PCH creation for Cocoa.h
Original log:
---------------------
Correctly track tags and enum members defined in the prototype of a function, and ensure they are properly scoped.
This fixes code such as:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return 0;
}
This finally fixes PR5464 and PR5477.
---------------------
I also reverted r151641 which was enhancement on top of r151638.
====================
llvm-svn: 151712
Original log:
---------------------
Correctly track tags and enum members defined in the prototype of a function, and ensure they are properly scoped.
This fixes code such as:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return 0;
}
This finally fixes PR5464 and PR5477.
---------------------
I also reverted r151641 which was enhancement on top of r151638.
llvm-svn: 151667
Original log:
When evaluating integer expressions handle logical operators outside
VisitBinaryOperator() to reduce stack pressure for source with huge number
of logical operators.
Fixes rdar://10913206.
llvm-svn: 151464
(Hopefully, common usage of these pragmas isn't irregular enough to break our current handling. Doug has ideas for a more crazy approach if necessary.)
llvm-svn: 151307
This adds the -Wformat-non-standard flag (off by default,
enabled by -pedantic), which warns about non-standard
things in format strings (such as the 'q' length modifier,
the 'S' conversion specifier, etc.)
llvm-svn: 151154
This is in preparation for being able to warn about 'q' and other
non-standard format string features.
It also allows us to print its name correctly.
llvm-svn: 150697
This commit makes PrintfSpecifier::fixType() and ScanfSpecifier::fixType()
only fix a conversion specification enough that Clang wouldn't warn about it,
as opposed to always changing it to use the "canonical" conversion specifier.
(PR11975)
This preserves the user's choice of conversion specifier in cases like:
printf("%a", (long double)1);
where we previously suggested "%Lf", we now suggest "%La"
printf("%x", (long)1);
where we previously suggested "%ld", we now suggest "%lx".
llvm-svn: 150578
* if, switch, range-based for: warn if semicolon is on the same line.
* for, while: warn if semicolon is on the same line and either next
statement is compound statement or next statement has more
indentation.
Replacing the semicolon with {} or moving the semicolon to the next
line will always silence the warning.
Tests from SemaCXX/if-empty-body.cpp merged into SemaCXX/warn-empty-body.cpp.
llvm-svn: 150515
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
This is a great warning, but it was observed that a ton of real world code violates
it all the time for (semi-)legitimate reasons. This warnings is fairly pedantic, which is good,
but not for everyone. For example, there is a fair amount of idiomatic code out there
that does "default: abort()", and similar idioms.
Addresses <rdar://problem/10814651>.
llvm-svn: 150055
value of class type, look for a unique conversion operator converting to
integral or unscoped enumeration type and use that. Implements [expr.const]p5.
Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now performs the conversion and returns
the converted result. Some important callers of Expr::isIntegralConstantExpr
have been switched over to using it (including all of those required for C++11
conformance); this switch brings a side-benefit of improved diagnostics and, in
several cases, simpler code. However, some language extensions and attributes
have not been moved across and will not perform implicit conversions on
constant expressions of literal class type where an ICE is required.
In passing, fix static_assert to perform a contextual conversion to bool on its
argument.
llvm-svn: 149776
argument in strncat.
The warning is ignored by default since it needs more qualification.
TODO: The warning message and the note are messy when
strncat is a builtin due to the macro expansion.
llvm-svn: 149524
- Remove the printf0 special handling as we treat it as printf anyway.
- Perform basic checks (non-literal, empty) for all formats and not only printf/scanf.
llvm-svn: 149236
like Darwin that don't support it. We should also complain about
invalid -fvisibility=protected, but that information doesn't seem
to exist at the most appropriate time, so I've left a FIXME behind.
llvm-svn: 149186
Rewording the diagnostic to be more precise/correct: "default label in switch
which covers all enumeration values" and changed the switch to
-Wcovered-switch-default
llvm-svn: 148783
Changing wording to include the word "explicitly" (as in "enumeration value ...
not /explicitly/ handled by switch"), as suggested by Richard Smith.
Also, now that the diagnostic text differs between -Wswitch and -Wswitch-enum,
I've simplified the test cases a bit.
llvm-svn: 148781
This is for consistency, since the flag is actually under -Wswitch now, rather
than -Wswitch-enum (since it's really valuable for the former and rather
orthogonal to the latter)
llvm-svn: 148680
Clang previously implemented -Wswitch-enum the same as -Wswitch. This patch
corrects the behavior to match GCC's. The critical/only difference being that
-Wswitch-enum is not silenced by the presence of a default case in the switch.
llvm-svn: 148679
For consistency with GCC & reasonable sanity. The FIXME suggests that the
original author was perhaps using the default check for some other purpose,
not realizing the more obvious limitation/false-negatives it creates, but this
doesn't seem to produce any regressions & fixes the included test.
llvm-svn: 148649
This warning acts as the complement to the main -Wswitch-enum warning (which
warns whenever a switch over enum without a default doesn't cover all values of
the enum) & has been an an-doc coding convention in LLVM and Clang in my
experience. The purpose is to ensure there's never a "dead" default in a
switch-over-enum because this would hide future -Wswitch-enum errors.
The name warning has a separate flag name so it can be disabled but it's grouped
under -Wswitch-enum & is on-by-default because of this.
The existing violations of this rule in test cases have had the warning disabled
& I've added a specific test for the new behavior (many negative cases already
exist in the same test file - and none regressed - so I didn't add more).
Reviewed by Ted Kremenek ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120116/051690.html )
llvm-svn: 148640
Includes tests highlighting the cases where accuracy has improved
(there is one call that does no filtering beyond selecting the set
of allowed keywords, and one call that only triggers for ObjC code
for which a test by someone who knows ObjC would be welcome). Also
fixes a small typo in one of the suggestion messages, and drops a
malformed "expected-note" for a suggestion that did not occur even
when the malformed note was committed as r145930.
llvm-svn: 148420
not integer constant expressions. In passing, fix the 'folding is an extension'
diagnostic to not claim we're accepting the code, since that's not true in
-pedantic-errors mode, and add this diagnostic to -Wgnu.
llvm-svn: 148209
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
whether an expression is a (core) constant expression as a side-effect of
evaluation. This takes us from accepting far too few expressions as ICEs to
accepting slightly too many -- fixes for the remaining cases are coming next.
The diagnostics produced when an expression is found to be non-constant are
currently quite poor (with generic wording but reasonable source locations),
and will be improved in subsequent commits.
llvm-svn: 146289
documentation) with one based on what GCC's __builtin_constant_p is actually
intended to do (discovered by asking a friendly GCC developer).
In particular, an expression which folds to a pointer is now only considered to
be a "constant" by this builtin if it refers to the first character in a string
literal.
This fixes a rather subtle wrong-code issue when building with glibc. Given:
const char cs[4] = "abcd";
int f(const char *p) { return strncmp(p, cs, 4); }
... the macro magic for strncmp produces a (potentially crashing) call to
strlen(cs), because it expands to an expression starting with:
__builtin_constant_p(cs) && strlen(cs) < 4 ? /* ... */
Under the secret true meaning of __builtin_constant_p, this is guaranteed to be
safe!
llvm-svn: 146236
they are treated as errors.
Doing typo correction when these are just warnings slows down the
compilation of source which deliberately uses implicit function
declarations.
llvm-svn: 146153
in addition to underlying type.
For example, the warning for printf("%zu", 42.0);
changes from "conversion specifies type 'unsigned long'" to "conversion
specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long')"
(This is a second attempt after r145697, which got reverted.)
llvm-svn: 146032
bound to not have side effects(!). Add constant-folding support for expressions
of void type, to ensure that we can still fold ((void)0, 1) as an array bound.
llvm-svn: 146000
For example, the warning for printf("%zu", 42.0);
changes from "conversion specifies type 'unsigned long'" to "conversion
specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long')"
llvm-svn: 145697
The Neon load/store intrinsics need to be implemented as macros to avoid
hiding alignment attributes on the pointer arguments, and the macros can
only evaluate those pointer arguments once (in case they have side effects),
so it has been hard to get the right type checking for those pointers.
I tried various alternatives in the arm_neon.h header, but it's much more
straightforward to just check directly in Sema.
llvm-svn: 144075
string is part of the function call, then there is no difference. If the
format string is not, the warning will point to the call site and a note
will point to where the format string is.
Fix-it hints for strings are moved to the note if a note is emitted. This will
prevent changes to format strings that may be used in multiple places.
llvm-svn: 143168
The code had it backwards, thinking size_t was signed, and using that for "%zd".
Also let the analysis get the types for (u)intmax_t while we are at it.
llvm-svn: 143099
Use "%f" as format string to make sure it doesn't match size_t, etc.
whatever they might be typedeffed to, so that the fixit always applies.
llvm-svn: 142348
Turns out this part of the test from r142342 wasn't portable.
The errors on the bots look like this:
E:\bb-win7\cmake-clang-i686-msys\build\tools\clang\test\Sema\Output\format-strings-fixit.c.tmp:58:13: error: conversion specifies type 'unsigned int' but the argument has type 'ssize_t' (aka 'long')
printf("%zd", (ssize_t) 42);
~~^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
%zd
Obviously we can't typedef ssize_t to someting that doesn't have the same size as size_t and expect it to work.
But it's also weird that the format string "%zd" gets interpreted as "unsigned int" when it should clearly be signed.
llvm-svn: 142345
For PR11152. Make PrintSpecifier::fixType() suggest "%zu" for size_t, etc.
rather than looking at the underlying type and suggesting "%llu" or other
platform-specific length modifiers. Applies to C99 and C++11.
llvm-svn: 142342
changed the return type of a compare of two unsigned vectors to be unsigned. This patch removes the check for hasIntegerRepresentation since its not needed and returns the appropriate signed type.
I added a new test case and updated exisiting test cases that assumed an unsigned result.
llvm-svn: 142250
This changes clang to match GCC's behavior for __extension__, which temporarily
disables the -pedantic flag. Warnings that are enabled without -pedantic
are not affected. Besides the general goodness of matching GCC's precedent,
my motivation for this is that macros in the arm_neon.h header need to use
__extension__ to avoid pedantic complaints about their use of statement
expressions, yet we still want to warn about incompatible pointer arguments
for those macros.
llvm-svn: 141804
return to one which does not return (has noreturn attribute)
should warn as it is an unsafe assignment. // rdar://10095762
c++ already handles this. This is the c version.
llvm-svn: 141141
Eli Friedman