Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Preston Gurd be1c875a1c Trivial change to make the test use Use –mcpu=generic,
so that the test will not fail when run on an Intel Atom
processor, due to the Atom scheduler producing an instruction sequence that is
different from that which is normally expected.

llvm-svn: 151832
2012-03-01 19:57:20 +00:00
Preston Gurd 43b2506e32 test commit.
llvm-svn: 151588
2012-02-27 23:31:51 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi c10801e8a5 test/CodeGen/X86: FileCheck-ize and add explicit -mtriple=x86_64-linux. They are useless to Win64 target.
llvm-svn: 127732
2011-03-16 13:52:38 +00:00
Dan Gohman fb9bea7150 Add nounwinds.
llvm-svn: 93919
2010-01-19 21:51:51 +00:00
Dan Gohman 40503396da Eliminate more uses of llvm-as and llvm-dis.
llvm-svn: 81290
2009-09-08 23:54:48 +00:00
Dan Gohman a5b9645c4b Split the Add, Sub, and Mul instruction opcodes into separate
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.

For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.

This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt

llvm-svn: 72897
2009-06-04 22:49:04 +00:00
Evan Cheng 724029151b Don't mask the isel bug.
llvm-svn: 47018
2008-02-12 19:11:29 +00:00
Evan Cheng b21301fbe7 Fix some test cases.
llvm-svn: 46998
2008-02-12 07:22:46 +00:00
Dan Gohman e0c3d9f338 Strength reduction improvements.
- Avoid attempting stride-reuse in the case that there are users that
   aren't addresses. In that case, there will be places where the
   multiplications won't be folded away, so it's better to try to
   strength-reduce them.

 - Several SSE intrinsics have operands that strength-reduction can
   treat as addresses. The previous item makes this more visible, as
   any non-address use of an IV can inhibit stride-reuse.

 - Make ValidStride aware of whether there's likely to be a base
   register in the address computation. This prevents it from thinking
   that things like stride 9 are valid on x86 when the base register is
   already occupied.

Also, XFAIL the 2007-08-10-LEA16Use32.ll test; the new logic to avoid
stride-reuse elimintes the LEA in the loop, so the test is no longer
testing what it was intended to test.

llvm-svn: 43231
2007-10-22 20:40:42 +00:00