This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626 for details -- this re-enables the
CTAD we removed, since it does break some stuff as well (even though it's
not nearly as bad as the removed constructors fixed by D121626).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122184
Back in 3a208c6894, we implemented the range-based constructor for <span>.
However, in doing so, we removed a previous non-standard constructor that
we provided before shipping <ranges>. Unfortunately, that breaks code that
was relying on a range-based constructor until we ship all of <ranges>.
This patch reintroduces the old non-conforming constructors and tests
that were removed in 3a208c6894 and uses them whenever <ranges> is
not provided (e.g. in LLVM 14). This is only a temporary workaround
until we enable <ranges> by default in C++20, which should hopefully
happen by LLVM 15.
The goal is to cherry-pick this workaround back to the LLVM 14 release
branch, since I suspect the constructor removal may otherwise cause
breakage out there, like the breakage I saw internally.
We could have avoided this situation by waiting for C++20 to be finalized
before shipping std::span. For example, we could have guarded it with
something like _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES to prevent users from
accidentally starting to depend on it before it is stable. We did not
have these mechanisms when std::span was first implemented, though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626
It turns out that the whole header is only enabled in C++20 and above,
so these checks were redundant (and always true).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121604
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
Mark LWG3274 as complete. The feature test macro `__cpp_lib_span` was added in
`6d2599e4f776d0cd88438cb82a00c4fc25cc3f67`.
https://wg21.link/p1024 mentions marking `span:::empty()` with
`[[nodiscard]]` which is not done yet. So, do that and add tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111516
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as `<__algorithm/find.h>` instead of
`<algorithm>`, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin
to rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
This is the first of four patches. Patch #2 will solve the problem for
pre-processor `#include`s; patches #3 and #4 will solve the problem for
`<__tree>` and `<__hash_table>` (since I've never touched the test cases
that are failing for these two, I want to split them out into their own
commits to be extra careful). Patch #5 will concern itself with
`<__threading_support>`, which intersects with libcxxabi (which I know
even less about).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105932
A span has no idea what container (if any) "owns" its iterators, nor
under what circumstances they might become invalidated.
However, continue to use `__wrap_iter<T*>` instead of raw `T*` outside
of debug mode, because we've been shipping `std::span` since Clang 7
and ldionne doesn't want to break ABI. (Namely, the mangling of functions
taking `span::iterator` as a parameter.) Permit using raw `T*` there,
but only under an ABI macro: `_LIBCPP_ABI_SPAN_POINTER_ITERATORS`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101003
This is the initial patch to implement ranges in libc++.
Implements parts of:
- P0896R4 One Ranges Proposal
- P1870 forwarding-range is too subtle
- LWG3379 in several library names is misleading
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, cjdb, zoecarver, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90999
I think people were sometimes parenthesizing `(foo::max)()` out of
misplaced concern that an unparenthesized `foo::max()` would trip up
Windows' `max(a,b)` macro. However, this is not the case: `max(a,b)`
should be tripped up only by an unparenthesized call to `foo::max(a,b)`,
and in fact we already do `_VSTD::max(a,b)` all over the place anyway
without any guards.
However, in order to do it without guards, we must also
wrap the header in _LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS, which <span> was not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92240
This change removes both the member function swap and the free function
overload of swap for std::span. While swap is a member and overloaded
for every other container in the standard library [1], it is neither a
member function nor a free function overload for std::span [2].
Thus the corresponding implementation should be removed.
[1] https://eel.is/c++draft/libraryindex#:swap
[2] https://eel.is/c++draft/span.overview
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69827
This implements the relaxed requirements on the std::array constructors of span,
where the type only needs to be convertible to the element type of the span.
Note that the previous tests were not sufficient, as the const array<T, n> constructor
was only tested for compile time and the array<T, N> only during runtime.
Restructure the tests so that we can test conversions as well as both constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75706
The default constructor of a static span requires _Extent == 0 so
SFINAE it out rather than using a static_assert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71994
The static asserts in span<T, N>::front() and span<T, N>::back() are
incorrect as they may be triggered from valid code due to evaluation
of a never taken branch:
span<int, 0> foo;
if (!foo.empty()) {
auto x = foo.front();
}
The problem is that the branch is always evaluated by the compiler,
creating invalid compile errors for span<T, 0>.
Thanks to Michael Schellenberger Costa for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71995
The calculation _Offset + _Count <= size() may overflow, so use
_Count <= size() - _Offset instead. Note that this is safe due to
the previous constraint that _Offset <= size().
Patch by Michael Schellenberger Costa.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71998
The extent of the returned span was always std::dynamic_extent, which
is incorrect.
Thanks to Michael Schellenberger Costa for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71997
size_t is always greater than 0, so remove the artifact from the old
index_type.
Patch by Michael Schellenberger Costa.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71996
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Add error messages to a couple of static_asserts in span to match the
style used in the rest of the file. Also fix an extra paren typo in a
assert error message.
Committed on behalf of Jason Lovett.
Reviewers: ldionne
Subscribers: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52841
llvm-svn: 343725
Konstantin Varlamov