class A<bit a, bits<3> x, bits<3> y> {
bits<3> z;
let z = !if(a, x, y);
}
The variable z will get the value of x when 'a' is 1 and 'y' when a is '0'.
llvm-svn: 121666
Given the pattern below as an example:
list<dag> Pattern = [(set RC:$dst, (v4f32 (shufp:src3 RC:$src1,
(mem_frag addr:$src2))))];
The right reference resolving should lead to:
list<dag> Pattern = [(set VR128:$dst, (v4f32 (shufp:src3 VR128:$src1,
(mem_frag addr:$src2))))];
But was yielding:
list<dag> Pattern = [(set VR128:$dst, (v4f32 (shufp VR128:$src1,
(mem_frag addr:$src2))))];
Fix this by passing the right name when creating a new DagInit node.
llvm-svn: 106670
When a target instruction wants to set target-specific flags, it should simply
set bits in the TSFlags bit vector defined in the Instruction TableGen class.
This works well because TableGen resolves member references late:
class I : Instruction {
AddrMode AM = AddrModeNone;
let TSFlags{3-0} = AM.Value;
}
let AM = AddrMode4 in
def ADD : I;
TSFlags gets the expected bits from AddrMode4 in this example.
llvm-svn: 100384
If a TableGen class has an initializer expression containing an X.Y subexpression,
AND X depends on template parameters,
AND those template parameters have defaults,
AND some parameters with defaults are beyond position 1,
THEN parts of the initializer expression are evaluated prematurely with the default values when the first explicit template parameter is substituted, before the remaining explicit template parameters have been substituted.
llvm-svn: 99492
values, resolving references to them, and then removing the definitions.
If a template argument is set to an undefined value, we need to resolve
references to that argument to an explicit undefined value. The current code
leaves the reference to the template argument as it is, which causes an
assertion failure later when the definition of the template argument is
removed.
llvm-svn: 89581
- This manifested as non-determinism in the .inc output in rare cases (when two
distinct patterns ended up being equivalent, which is rather rare). That
meant the pattern matching was non-deterministic, which could eventually mean
the code generator selected different instructions based on the arch.
- It's probably worth making the DAGISel ensure a total ordering (or force the
user to), but the simple fix here is to totally order the Record* maps based
on a unique ID.
- PR4672, PR4711.
Yay:
--
ddunbar@giles:~$ cat ~/llvm.obj.64/lib/Target/*/*.inc | shasum
d1099ff34b21459a5a3e7021c225c080e6017ece -
ddunbar@giles:~$ cat ~/llvm.obj.ppc/lib/Target/*/*.inc | shasum
d1099ff34b21459a5a3e7021c225c080e6017ece -
--
llvm-svn: 79846
other operators. For the rare cases where a list type cannot be
deduced, provide a []<type> syntax, where <type> is the list element
type.
llvm-svn: 73078
Use it on dags and lists like this:
class decls {
string name;
}
def Decls : decls;
class B<list<string> names> : A<!foreach(Decls.name, names, !strconcat(Decls.name, ", Sr."))>;
llvm-svn: 71803
Create an OpInit class to serve as a base for all operation Inits.
Move parsing of operation constructs to separate functions and reference
from multiple places.
Add some commented out new operations. Coming soon.
llvm-svn: 71789
in selectiondag patterns. This is required for the upcoming shuffle_vector rewrite,
and as it turns out, cleans up a hack in the Alpha instruction info.
llvm-svn: 67286
use a SUB instruction instead of an ADD, because -128 can be
encoded in an 8-bit signed immediate field, while +128 can't be.
This avoids the need for a 32-bit immediate field in this case.
A similar optimization applies to 64-bit adds with 0x80000000,
with the 32-bit signed immediate field.
To support this, teach tablegen how to handle 64-bit constants.
llvm-svn: 57663
David Greene