This patch resolves crash that occurs when user wanted to remove all
symbols and add a brand new one using:
```
llvm-objcopy -R .symtab --add-symbol foo=1234 in.o out.o
```
Before these changes the symbol table internally being null when adding
new symbols. For now we will regenerate symtab in this case.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43930
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82935
OSS-Fuzz and the Emscripten test suite uncovered some edge cases in
which the range check instruction seemed to be an (i32.const 0) or
other unexpected instruction, triggering an assertion. Unfortunately
the reproducers are rather complicated, so they don't make good unit
tests. This commit removes the bad assertion and conservatively
optimizes range checks only when the range check instruction is
i32.gt_u.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83169
Xcode 12 beta apparently has the Wrange-loop-analysis changes from
half a year ago, but it seems to lack https://reviews.llvm.org/D72212
which made the warning usable again.
This fixes the build of compiler-rt on macOS when _not_ using
clang_base_path in args.gn: Xcode clang knows where to find the
SDK, but regular clang doesn't and needs a -isysroot parameter.
We correctly add that parameter when clang_base_path is set,
but else we omit it. If clang_base_path was not set, we also
didn't add the flag for stage2_unix_toolchain() when we build
compiler-rt with just-built clang.
Make stage2_unix_toolchain() use clang_base_path instead of setting
cc / cxx. It's less code, and it gets things like this right.
As it can be seen in newly-added (previously-crashing) test-case,
there can be a situation where multiple GV's are used in instr,
and we would schedule the same instruction to be deleted several times,
crashing when trying to delete it the second time.
We could either store WeakVH (done here), or use something set-like.
I think using WeakVH is prevalent in these cases elsewhere.
As it can be seen in newly-added (previously-crashing) test-case,
there can be a situation where multiple arguments are used in instr,
and we would schedule the same instruction to be deleted several times,
crashing when trying to delete it the second time.
We could either store WeakVH (done here), or use something set-like.
I think using WeakVH is prevalent in these cases elsewhere.
We need to ensure that the sign bits of the result all match
so we can't fold to undef.
Similar to PR46585.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83163
This is the first and most basic ICV Tracking implementation. For this
first version, we only support deduplication within the same BB.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, JonChesterfield, hamax97, jhuber6, uenoku,
baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81788
Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmentInfo() uses
getOperandBundle("align"), which internally assumes that it isn't the
case, and happily crashes otherwise.
Minimal reduced reproducer: run `opt -alignment-from-assumptions` on
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
%0 = type { i64, %1*, i8*, i64, %2, i32, %3*, i8* }
%1 = type opaque
%2 = type { i8, i8, i16 }
%3 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }
; Function Attrs: nounwind
define i32 @f(%0* noalias nocapture readonly %arg, %0* noalias %arg1) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(%0* %arg, i64 8), "align"(%0* %arg1, i64 8) ]
ret i32 0
}
; Function Attrs: nounwind willreturn
declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1
attributes #0 = { nounwind "reciprocal-estimates"="none" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind willreturn }
This is what we'd have with -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention
This reverts commit c95ffadb24.
Complete the rework of the initial implementation of external I/O
to fix problems found in testing (tests to follow); add handlers
for hitherto unimplemented PAUSE, FLUSH, ENDFILE, BACKSPACE, and
REWIND statements.
Reviewed By: tskeith, sscalpone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83162
zext_vector_inreg needs to produces 0s in the extended bits and
sext_vector_inreg needs to produce upper bits that are all the
same. So we should fold them to a 0 vector instead of undef.
Fixes PR46585.
clang w/ old-pm currently would simply crash
when -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention=true is specified.
Clearly, these two passes had no Old-PM test coverage,
which would have shown the problem - not requiring AssumptionCacheTracker,
but then trying to always get it.
Also, why try to get domtree only if it's cached,
but at the same time marking it as required?
The per-I/O-statement state structures need to support missing
external I/O statements, and some bugs found in testing with
formatted input and record advancement are fixed. The effects
of these changes will not be visible until further patches to
the I/O API handlers are pushed.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83151
Probably not super important since there are no real CPUs with
avx512vl and not avx512bw. But vpternlog should be better than
vblendvb.
I do wonder if we should use vpternlog even with BWI. We
currently use vblendmb or vpblendmw by putting the mask into a GPR
and moving it to a k-register. But I don't think we hoist the
GPR to k-register copy in machine LICM. Using VPTERNLOG would use
a constant pool load, but has the advantage that we're pretty good
at hoisting and rematerializing those.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83156
VPBLENDVB is multiple uops while VPTERNLOG is a single uop. So
we should use that instead.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83155
As noted in PR46561:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46561
...it takes something beyond a minimal IR example to trigger
this bug because it relies on matching non-canonical IR.
There are no tests that show the need for matching this
pattern, so I'm just deleting it to fix the miscompile.
Summary:
The actual transform i was going after was:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Tp9H
```
Name: zz
Pre: isPowerOf2(C0) && isPowerOf2(C1) && C1 == C0
%t0 = and i8 %x, C0
%r = icmp eq i8 %t0, C1
=>
%t = icmp eq i8 %t0, 0
%r = xor i1 %t, -1
Name: zz
Pre: isPowerOf2(C0)
%t0 = and i8 %x, C0
%r = icmp ne i8 %t0, 0
=>
%t = icmp eq i8 %t0, 0
%r = xor i1 %t, -1
```
but as it can be seen from the current tests, we already canonicalize most of it,
and we are only missing handling multi-use non-canonical icmp predicates.
If we have both `!=0` and `==0`, even though we can CSE them,
we end up being stuck with them. We should canonicalize to the `==0`.
I believe this is one of the cleanup steps i'll need after `-scalarizer`
if i end up proceeding with my WIP alloca promotion helper pass.
Reviewers: spatel, jdoerfert, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: zzheng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83139
The use of 'tmp' can trigger warnings from the update_test_checks.py
script. That's evidence of a flaw in the script's logic, but we
can always do better than naming variables 'tmp' in LLVM too.
The phi test file should be updated with auto-generated regex CHECK
lines, so it isn't affected by cosmetic diffs, but I don't have
time to do that right now.
Currently matchBinOpReduction only handles shufflevector reduction patterns, but in many cases these only occur in the final stages of a reduction, once we're down to legal vector widths.
Before this its likely that we are performing reductions using subvector extractions to repeatedly split the source vector in half and perform the binop on the halves.
Assuming we've found a non-partial reduction, this patch continues looking for subvector reductions as far as it can beyond the last shufflevector.
Fixes PR37890
Tests based on the PR37890 test cases - the vector combine pass should leave us with a reduction chain ending in extract(add(x,shuffle(x,1,-1,...))), but the higher reduction stages will be subvector extractions not shuffles.
Introduce pass to convert parallel affine.for op into 1-D
affine.parallel op. Run using --affine-parallelize. Removes
test-detect-parallel: pass for checking parallel affine.for ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82672
Using PACK for truncations leaves us with intermediate shuffles that can be tricky to remove while the truncation tree is being formed.
This fold helps pull out the PERMQ case which is one of the most common, avoiding some costly lane-crossing shuffles.
A future patch will begin adding more general shuffle folding, which we should be able to use for HADD/HSUB as well.
If you were around the analyzer for a while now, you must've seen a lot of
patches that awkwardly puts code from one library to the other:
* D75360 moves the constructors of CheckerManager, which lies in the Core
library, to the Frontend library. Most the patch itself was a struggle along
the library lines.
* D78126 had to be reverted because dependency information would be utilized
in the Core library, but the actual data lied in the frontend.
D78126#inline-751477 touches on this issue as well.
This stems from the often mentioned problem: the Frontend library depends on
Core and Checkers, Checkers depends on Core. The checker registry functions
(`registerMallocChecker`, etc) lie in the Checkers library in order to keep each
checker its own module. What this implies is that checker registration cannot
take place in the Core, but the Core might still want to use the data that
results from it (which checker/package is enabled, dependencies, etc).
D54436 was the patch that initiated this. Back in the days when CheckerRegistry
was super dumb and buggy, it implemented a non-documented solution to this
problem by keeping the data in the Core, and leaving the logic in the Frontend.
At the time when the patch landed, the merger to the Frontend made sense,
because the data hadn't been utilized anywhere, and the whole workaround without
any documentation made little sense to me.
So, lets put the data back where it belongs, in the Core library. This patch
introduces `CheckerRegistryData`, and turns `CheckerRegistry` into a short lived
wrapper around this data that implements the logic of checker registration. The
data is tied to CheckerManager because it is required to parse it.
Side note: I can't help but cringe at the fact how ridiculously awkward the
library lines are. I feel like I'm thinking too much inside the box, but I guess
this is just the price of keeping the checkers so modularized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82585
While lowering min/max pooling ops to loops, generate the right kind of
load/stores (std or affine) instead of always generating std
load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83080
AArch64ExpandPseudo::expand_DestructiveOp contains an assert to
ensure the destructive operand's register is unique. However,
this is only required when psuedo expansion emits a movprfx.
A simple example when a movprfx is not required is
Z0 = FADD_ZPZZ_UNDEF_S P0, Z0, Z0
which expands to an unprefixed FADD_ZPmZ_S instruction.
This patch moves the assert to the places where a movprfx is emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83029
Summary:
ClangdServer owns the question of exactly which config to create, but
TUScheduler/BackgroundIndex control threads and so decide at which point
to inject it.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83095
This is picking up a loose thread from D69006: We can simplify
(zext x) ule (sext x) and (zext x) sge (sext x) to true, with
various permutations. Oddly, SCEV knows about this identity,
but nothing on the IR level does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83081
Summary:
The Provider extension point is designed to also be implemented by
ClangdLSPServer (to inject config-over-lsp) and likely by embedders.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82964
This patch is part of supporting `-fstack-clash-protection`. Implemented
probing when emitting prologue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81460
Rework initial implementation of external I/O unit operations to
fix problems exposed in unit tests (in a later patch). Add flushing.
Reviewed By: sscalpone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83147
Nathan James