This seems to be the behavior of the MSVC linker. Previously, this
incompatibility caused nasty issues in chromium build a few times.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30363
llvm-svn: 301598
LLD is a multi-threaded program. errs() or outs() are not guaranteed
to be thread-safe (they are actually not).
LLD's message(), log() or error() are thread-safe. We should use them.
llvm-svn: 295787
This ports the ELF linker's symbol table design, introduced in r268178,
to the COFF linker.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21166
llvm-svn: 289280
LLD used to take 11.73 seconds to link Clang. Now it is 6.94 seconds.
MSVC link takes 83.02 seconds. Note that ICF is enabled by default on
Windows, so a low latency ICF is more important than in ELF.
llvm-svn: 288487
Associative sections are sections that need to be linked if their associated
sections are linked. Associative sections are used to append auxiliary data
such as debug info.
Previously, we compared all associative sections when comparing two comdat
sections. Because usually assocative sections are not mergeable sections,
we missed a lot of mergeable sections. MSVC linker doesn't seem to check
the identity of associative sections.
This patch makes LLD to ignore associative sections when doing ICF.
llvm-svn: 288483
If a section symbol is not external, that COMDAT section should never
be merge with other sections in other compilation unit. Previously,
we didn't take visibility into account.
Note that COMDAT sections with non-external visibility makes sense
because they can be removed by dead-stripping.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25686
llvm-svn: 254578
There was a threading issue in the ICF code for COFF. That seems like
a venign bug in the sense that it doesn't produce an incorrect output,
but it oftentimes misses reducible sections. As a result, mergeable
sections could remain in outputs, which makes the output nondeterministic.
Basically the algorithm we are using for ICF is this: We group sections
so that identical sections will eventually be in the same group. Initially,
all sections are in one group. We split the group by relocation targets
until we get a convergence (if relocation targets are in different gruops,
the sections are different). Once a group is split, they will never be
merged.
Each section has a group ID. That variable itself is atomic, so there's
no threading issue at the level that we can use thread sanitizer.
The point is, when we split a group, we re-assign new group IDs to group
of sections. That are multiple separate writes to atomic varaibles.
Thus, splitting a group is not an atomic operation, and there's a small
chance that the other thread observes inconsistent group IDs.
Over-splitting is always "safe", so it will never create incorrect output.
I suspect that the nondeterminism stems from that point. However, I
cannot prove or fix that at this moment, so I'm going to avoid using
threads here.
llvm-svn: 251300
There's actually a room to improve this patch. Instead of not merging
sections that have different alignements, we can choose the section that
has the largest alignment requirement among all sections that are otherwise
considered the same. Then all section alignments are satisfied, so we can
merge them.
I don't know if that improvement could make any difference for real-world
input, so I'll leave it alone. Would be interesting to revisit later.
llvm-svn: 248581
std::distance(C->Relocs.end(), C->Relocs.begin()) is the same as NumRelocs
which is already added to the hash value. What we are missing here is the
section size.
llvm-svn: 248202
This patch fixes a regression introduced by r247964. Relocations that
are referring the same symbol should be considered equal, but they
were not if they were pointing to non-section chunks.
llvm-svn: 248132
The LLD's ICF algorithm is highly parallelizable. This patch does that
using parallel_for_each.
ICF accounted for about one third of total execution time. Previously,
it took 324 ms when self-hosting. Now it takes only 62 ms.
Of course your mileage may vary. My machine is a beefy 24-core Xeon machine,
so you may not see this much speedup. But this optimization should be
effective even for 2-core machine, since I saw speedup (324 ms -> 189 ms)
when setting parallelism parameter to 2.
llvm-svn: 248038
Previously, ICF created a vector for each SectionChunk. The vector
contained pointers to successors, which are namely associative sections
and COMDAT relocation targets. The reason I created vectors is because
I thought that that would make section comparison faster.
It did make the comparison faster. When self-linking, for example, it
saved about 10 ms on each iteration. The time we spent on constructing
the vectors was 124 ms. If we iterate more than 12 times, return from
the investment exceeds the initial cost.
In reality, it usually needs 5 iterations. So we shouldn't construct
the vectors.
llvm-svn: 247963
equalsConstants() is the heaviest function in ICF, and that consumes
more than half of total ICF execution time. Of which, section content
comparison accounts for roughly one third.
Previously, we compared section contents at the beginning of the
function after comparing their checksums. The comparison is very
likely to succeed because when the control reaches that comparison,
their checksums are always equal. And because checksums are 64-bit
CRC, they are unlikely to collide.
We compared relocations and associative sections after that.
If they are different, the time we spent on byte-by-byte comparison
of section contents were wasted.
This patch moves the comparison at the end of function. If the
comparison fails, the time we spent on relocation comparison are
wasted, but as I wrote it's very unlikely to happen.
LLD took 1198 ms to link itself to produce a 27.11 MB executable.
Of which, ICF accounted for 536 ms. This patch cuts it by 90 ms,
which is 17% speedup of ICF and 7.5% speedup overall. All numbers
are median of ten runs.
llvm-svn: 247961
This patch defines ICF class and defines ICF-related functions as
members of the class. By doing this we can move code that are
related only to ICF from SectionChunk to the newly-defined class.
This also eliminates a global variable "NextID".
llvm-svn: 247802
This is a patch to make LLD to be on par with MSVC in terms of ICF
effectiveness. MSVC produces a 27.14MB executable when linking LLD.
LLD previously produced a 27.61MB when self-linking. Now the size
is reduced to 27.11MB. Note that without ICF the size is 29.63MB.
In r247387, I implemented an algorithm that handles section graphs
as cyclic graphs and merge them using SCC. The algorithm did not
always work as intended as I demonstrated in r247721. The new
algortihm implemented in this patch is different from the previous
one. If you are interested the details, you want to read the file
comment of ICF.cpp.
llvm-svn: 247770
Previously, LLD's ICF couldn't merge cyclic graphs. That was unfortunate
because, in COFF, cyclic graphs are not exceptional at all. That is
pretty common.
In this patch, sections are grouped by Tarjan's strongly connected
component algorithm to get acyclic graphs. And then we try to merge
SCCs whose outdegree is zero, and remove them from the graph. This
makes other SCCs to have outdegree zero, so we can repeat the
process until all SCCs are removed. When comparing two SCCs, we handle
cycles properly.
This algorithm works better than previous one. Previously, self-linking
produced a 29.0MB executable. It now produces a 27.7MB. There's still some
gap compared to MSVC linker which produces a 27.1MB executable for the
same input. So the gap is narrowed, but still LLD is not on par with MSVC.
I'll investigate that later.
llvm-svn: 247387
Identical COMDAT Folding is a feature to merge COMDAT sections
by contents. Two sections are considered the same if their contents,
relocations, attributes, etc, are all the same.
An interesting fact is that MSVC linker takes "iterations" parameter
for ICF because the algorithm they are using is iterative. Merging
two sections could make more sections to be mergeable because
different relocations could now point to the same section. ICF is
repeated until we get a convergence (until no section can be merged).
This algorithm is not fast. Usually it needs three iterations until a
convergence is obtained.
In the new algorithm implemented in this patch, we consider sections
and relocations as a directed acyclic graph, and we try to merge
sections whose outdegree is zero. Sections with outdegree zero are then
removed from the graph, which makes other sections to have outdegree
zero. We repeat that until all sections are processed. In this
algorithm, we don't iterate over the same sections many times.
There's an apparent issue in the algorithm -- the section graph is
not guaranteed to be acyclic. It's actually pretty often cyclic.
So this algorithm cannot eliminate all possible duplicates.
That's OK for now because the previous algorithm was not able to
eliminate cycles too. I'll address the issue in a follow-up patch.
llvm-svn: 246878
Previously, we calculated our own hash values for section contents.
Of coruse that's slow because we had to access all bytes in sections.
Fortunately, COFF objects usually contain hash values for COMDAT
sections. We can use that to speed up Identical COMDAT Folding.
llvm-svn: 246869
Only SectionChunk can be dead-stripped. Previously,
all types of chunks implemented these functions,
but their functions were blank.
Likewise, only DefinedRegular and DefinedCOMDAT symbols
can be dead-stripped. markLive() function was implemented
for other symbol types, but they were blank.
I started thinking that the change I made in r240319 was
a mistake. I separated DefinedCOMDAT from DefinedRegular
because I thought that would make the code cleaner, but now
we want to handle them as the same type here. Maybe we
should roll it back.
This change should improve readability a bit as this removes
some dubious uses of reinterpret_cast. Previously, we
assumed that all COMDAT chunks are actually SectionChunks,
which was not very obvious.
llvm-svn: 240675
Rui Ueyama