The benchmarking summarized in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/113525.html showed
this is beneficial for a wide range of cores.
As is to be expected, quite a few small adaptations are needed to the
regressions tests, as the difference in scheduling results in:
- Quite a few small instruction schedule differences.
- A few changes in register allocation decisions caused by different
instruction schedules.
- A few changes in IfConversion decisions, due to a difference in
instruction schedule and/or the estimated cost of a branch mispredict.
llvm-svn: 306514
This changes the tests that were targeting ARM EABI to explicitly specify the
environment rather than relying on the default. This breaks with the new
Windows on ARM support when running the tests on Windows where the default
environment is no longer EABI.
Take the opportunity to avoid a pointless redirect (helps when trying to debug
with providing a command line invocation which can be copy and pasted) and
removing a few greps in favour of FileCheck.
llvm-svn: 205541
This reverts r192454
Apparently FileCheck isn't as smart as I though and does not enforce a
topological order between variable defs+uses.
llvm-svn: 192472
to finalize MI bundles (i.e. add BUNDLE instruction and computing register def
and use lists of the BUNDLE instruction) and a pass to unpack bundles.
- Teach more of MachineBasic and MachineInstr methods to be bundle aware.
- Switch Thumb2 IT block to MI bundles and delete the hazard recognizer hack to
prevent IT blocks from being broken apart.
llvm-svn: 146542
int tries = INT_MAX;
while (tries > 0) {
tries--;
}
The check should be:
subs r4, #1
cmp r4, #0
bgt LBB0_1
The subs can set the overflow V bit when r4 is INT_MAX+1 (which loop
canonicalization apparently does in this case). cmp #0 would have cleared
it while not changing the N and Z bits. Since BGT is dependent on the V
bit, i.e. (N == V) && !Z, it is not safe to eliminate the cmp #0.
rdar://9172742
llvm-svn: 128179
at more than those which define CPSR. You can have this situation:
(1) subs ...
(2) sub r6, r5, r4
(3) movge ...
(4) cmp r6, 0
(5) movge ...
We cannot convert (2) to "subs" because (3) is using the CPSR set by
(1). There's an analogous situation here:
(1) sub r1, r2, r3
(2) sub r4, r5, r6
(3) cmp r4, ...
(5) movge ...
(6) cmp r1, ...
(7) movge ...
We cannot convert (1) to "subs" because of the intervening use of CPSR.
llvm-svn: 117950
legacy asm printer uses instructions of the form, "mov r0, r0, lsl #3", while
the MC-instruction printer uses the form "lsl r0, r0, #3". The latter mnemonic
is correct and preferred according the ARM documentation (A8.6.98). The former
are pseudo-instructions for the latter.
llvm-svn: 114221
only run for x86 with fastisel. I've found it being very effective in
eliminating some obvious dead code as result of formal parameter lowering
especially when tail call optimization eliminated the need for some of the loads
from fixed frame objects. It also shrinks a number of the tests. A couple of
tests no longer make sense and are now eliminated.
llvm-svn: 95493
Remove && from the end of the lines to prevent tests from throwing run
lines into the background. Also, clean up places where the same command
is run multiple times by using a temporary file.
llvm-svn: 36142
This feature is needed in order to support shifts of more than 255 bits
on large integer types. This changes the syntax for llvm assembly to
make shl, ashr and lshr instructions look like a binary operator:
shl i32 %X, 1
instead of
shl i32 %X, i8 1
Additionally, this should help a few passes perform additional optimizations.
llvm-svn: 33776
Kristof Beyls