Executing commands below will get you bombarded by a wall of Python
command prompts (>>> ).
$ echo 'foo' | ./bin/lldb -o script
$ cat /tmp/script
script
print("foo")
$ lldb --source /tmp/script
The issue is that our custom input reader doesn't handle EOF. According
to the Python documentation, file.readline always includes a trailing
newline character unless the file ends with an incomplete line. An empty
string signals EOF. This patch raises an EOFError when that happens.
[1] https://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#file.readline
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81898
Color the error: and warning: part of the CommandReturnObject output,
similar to how an error is printed from the driver when colors are
enabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81058
D80519 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80519>
added support for `DW_TAG_GNU_call_site` but
Bug 45886 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45886>
found one case did not work.
There is:
0x000000b1: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site
DW_AT_low_pc (0x000000000040111e)
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x000000cc "a")
...
0x000000cc: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("a")
DW_AT_prototyped (true)
DW_AT_low_pc (0x0000000000401109)
^^^^^^^^^^^^ - here it did overwrite the 'low_pc' variable containing value 0x40111e we wanted
DW_AT_high_pc (0x0000000000401114)
DW_AT_frame_base (DW_OP_call_frame_cfa)
DW_AT_GNU_all_call_sites (true)
DW_TAG_GNU_call_site attributes order as produced by GCC:
0x000000b1: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site
DW_AT_low_pc (0x000000000040111e)
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x000000cc "a")
clang produces the attributes in opposite order:
0x00000064: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x0000002a "a")
DW_AT_low_pc (0x0000000000401146)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81334
Previously, we were simply ignoring them and continuing the evaluation.
This behavior does not seem useful, because the resulting value will
most likely be completely bogus.
Several SBAddress properties use the lldb.target or lldb.process
convenience variables which are only set under the interactive script
interpreter. Unfortunately, users have been using these properties in
Python script and commands. This patch raises a Python exception to
force users to use GetLoadAddress instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80848
This adds a new target `check-lldb-reproducers` that replaces the old
`check-lldb-repro`. The latter would only run the shell tests, while
`check-lldb-reproducers` includes the API tests as well. The new target
will be used on GreenDragon.
It's still possible to run just the shell tests with reproducers,
although now that requires crafting the lit invocation yourself. The
parameters haven't changed and are the shame for the API and shell
tests:
--param lldb-run-with-repro=capture
--param lldb-run-with-repro=replay
This patch also updates the reproducer documentation.
Summary:
For ObjCInterfaceDecls, LLDB iterates over the `methods` of the interface in FindExternalVisibleDeclsByName
since commit ef423a3ba5 .
However, when LLDB calls `oid->methods()` in that function, Clang will pull in all declarations in the current
DeclContext from the current ExternalASTSource (which is again, `ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks`). The
reason for that is that `methods()` is just a wrapper for `decls()` which is supposed to provide a list of *all*
(both currently loaded and external) decls in the DeclContext.
However, `ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks::FindExternalLexicalDecls` doesn't implement support for ObjCInterfaceDecl,
so we don't actually add any declarations and just mark the ObjCInterfaceDecl as having no ExternalLexicalStorage.
As LLDB uses the ExternalLexicalStorage to see if it can complete a type with the ExternalASTSource, this causes
that LLDB thinks our class can't be completed any further by the ExternalASTSource
and will from on no longer make any CompleteType/FindExternalLexicalDecls calls to that decl. This essentially
renders those types unusable in the expression parser as they will always be considered incomplete.
This patch just changes the call to `methods` (which is just a `decls()` wrapper), to some ad-hoc `noload_methods`
call which is wrapping `noload_decls()`. `noload_decls()` won't trigger any calls to the ExternalASTSource, so
this prevents that ExternalLexicalStorage will be set to false.
The test for this is just adding a method to an ObjC interface. Before this patch, this unset the ExternalLexicalStorage
flag and put the interface into the state described above.
In a normal user session this situation was triggered by setting a breakpoint in a method of some ObjC class. This
caused LLDB to create the MethodDecl for that specific method and put it into the the ObjCInterfaceDecl.
Also `ObjCLanguageRuntime::LookupInCompleteClassCache` needs to be unable to resolve the type do
an actual definition when the breakpoint is set (I'm not sure how exactly this can happen, but we just
found no Type instance that had the `TypePayloadClang::IsCompleteObjCClass` flag set in its payload in
the situation where this happens. This however doesn't seem to be a regression as logic wasn't changed
from what I can see).
The module-ownership.mm test had to be changed as the only reason why the ObjC interface in that test had
it's ExternalLexicalStorage flag set to false was because of this unintended side effect. What actually happens
in the test is that ExternalLexicalStorage is first set to false in `DWARFASTParserClang::CompleteTypeFromDWARF`
when we try to complete the `SomeClass` interface, but is then the flag is set back to true once we add
the last ivar of `SomeClass` (see `SetMemberOwningModule` in `TypeSystemClang.cpp` which is called
when we add the ivar). I'll fix the code for that in a follow-up patch.
I think some of the code here needs some rethinking. LLDB and Clang shouldn't infer anything about the ExternalASTSource
and its ability to complete the current type form the `ExternalLexicalStorage` flag. We probably should
also actually provide any declarations when we get asked for the lexical decls of an ObjCInterfaceDecl. But both of those
changes are bigger (and most likely would cause us to eagerly complete more types), so those will be follow up patches
and this patch just brings us back to the state before commit ef423a3ba5 .
Fixes rdar://63584164
Reviewers: aprantl, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl, shafik
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80556
The llvm DWARFExpression dump is nearly identical, but better -- for
example it does print a spurious space after zero-argument expressions.
Some parts of our code (variable locations) have been already switched
to llvm-based expression dumping. This switches the remainder: unwind
plans and some unit tests.
This patchs adds an optional warning that is printed when stopped at a
frame that was compiled in a source language that LLDB has no plugin
for.
The motivational use-case is debugging Swift code on Linux. When the
user accidentally invokes the system LLDB that was built without the
Swift plugin, it is very much non-obvious why debugging doesnt
work. This warning makes it easy to figure out what went wrong.
<rdar://problem/56986569>
Print a little snippet before exiting when passed unrecognized
arguments. The goal is twofold:
- Point users to lldb --help.
- Make it clear that we exited the debugger.
There appears to be consensus in D80165 that this is the desired
behavior and I personally agree.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80226
Before the transition to libOption it was possible to specify arguments
for the inferior without -- as long as they didn't start with a dash.
For example, the following invocations should all behave the same:
$ lldb inferior inferior-arg
$ lldb inferior -- inferior-arg
$ lldb -- inferior inferior-arg
This patch fixes that behavior, documents it and adds a test to cover
the different combinations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80165
This reverts commit 525a591f0f.
Fixed an issue with pointers to members based on typedefs. In this case,
LLVM would emit a second UDT. I fixed it by not passing the class type
to getTypeIndex when the base type is not a function type. lowerType
only uses the class type for direct function types. This suggests if we
have a PMF with a function typedef, there may be an issue, but that can
be solved separately.
> Before this patch, S_[L|G][THREAD32|DATA32] records were emitted with a simple name, not the fully qualified name (namespace + class scope).
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79447
This causes asserts in Chromium builds:
CodeViewDebug.cpp:2997: void llvm::CodeViewDebug::emitDebugInfoForUDTs(const std::vector<std::pair<std::string, const DIType *>> &):
Assertion `OriginalSize == UDTs.size()' failed.
I will follow up on the Phabricator issue.
Before this patch, S_[L|G][THREAD32|DATA32] records were emitted with a simple name, not the fully qualified name (namespace + class scope).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79447
This recommits f665e80c02 which was reverted in 1cbd1b8f69 for breaking
TestFoundationDisassembly.py. The fix is to use --force in the test to avoid
bailing out on large functions.
I have also doubled the large function limit to 8000 bytes (~~ 2000 insns), as
the foundation library contains a lot of large-ish functions. The intent of this
feature is to prevent accidental disassembling of enormous (multi-megabyte)
"functions", not to get in people's way.
The original commit message follows:
If we have a binary without symbol information (and without
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, if on a mac), then we have to resort to using
heuristics to determine the function boundaries. However, these don't
always work, and so we can easily end up thinking we have functions
which are several megabytes in size. Attempting to (accidentally)
disassemble these can take a very long time spam the terminal with
thousands of lines of disassembly.
This patch works around that problem by adding a sanity check to the
disassemble command. If we are about to disassemble a function which is
larger than a certain threshold, we will refuse to disassemble such a
function unless the user explicitly specifies the number of instructions
to disassemble, uses start/stop addresses for disassembly, or passes the
(new) --force argument.
The threshold is currently fairly aggressive (4000 bytes ~~ 1000
instructions). If needed, we can increase it, or even make it
configurable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79789
These test don't execute the binaries they build, and so they don't need
to build for the host. By hardcoding the target, we don't have do xfail
or skip them for targets which don't have the appropriate support in
clang(-cl).
Summary:
If we have a binary without symbol information (and without
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, if on a mac), then we have to resort to using
heuristics to determine the function boundaries. However, these don't
always work, and so we can easily end up thinking we have functions
which are several megabytes in size. Attempting to (accidentally)
disassemble these can take a very long time spam the terminal with
thousands of lines of disassembly.
This patch works around that problem by adding a sanity check to the
disassemble command. If we are about to disassemble a function which is
larger than a certain threshold, we will refuse to disassemble such a
function unless the user explicitly specifies the number of instructions
to disassemble, uses start/stop addresses for disassembly, or passes the
(new) --force argument.
The threshold is currently fairly aggressive (4000 bytes ~~ 1000
instructions). If needed, we can increase it, or even make it
configurable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79789
Summary:
The D programming language has 'char', 'wchar', and 'dchar' as base types,
which are defined as UTF-8, UTF-16, and UTF-32, respectively.
It also has type constructors (e.g. 'const' and 'immutable'),
that leads to D compilers emitting DW_TAG_base_type with DW_ATE_UTF
and name 'char', 'immutable(wchar)', 'const(char)', etc...
Before this patch, DW_ATE_UTF would only recognize types that
followed the C/C++ naming, and emit an error message for the rest, e.g.:
```
error: need to add support for DW_TAG_base_type 'immutable(char)'
encoded with DW_ATE = 0x10, bit_size = 8
```
The code was changed to check the byte size first,
then fall back to the old name-based check.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79559
This patch marks following tests as xfail for arm-linux target.
lldb/test/API/functionalities/load_using_paths/TestLoadUsingPaths.py
lldb/test/API/python_api/thread/TestThreadAPI.py
lldb/test/Shell/Recognizer/assert.test
Bugs have been filed for all of them for the corresponding failing
component.
This patch fixes minidebuginfo-set-and-hit-breakpoint.test for arm-linux
targets. 32-bit elf executables use .rel.dyn and 64-bit uses .rela.dyn for
relocation entries for dynamic symbols.
While debugging why TestProcessList.py failed during passive replay, I
remembered that we don't serialize the arguments for ProcessInfo. This
is necessary to make the test pass and to make platform process list -v
behave the same during capture and replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79646
Following test cases need minor adjustment in order to accomodate xfail
decorator:
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/NativePDB/break-by-line.cpp
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/NativePDB/source-list.cpp
The relevant output FileCheck is scanning in this test is as follows:
CXXRecordDecl 0x7f96cf8239c8 <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> imported in A.B <undeserialized declarations> struct definition
<<DefinitionData boilerplate>>
`-FieldDecl 0x7f96cf823b90 <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> imported in A.B anon_field_b 'int'
(anonymous struct)
CXXRecordDecl 0x7f96cf823be8 <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> imported in A.B struct
Before 710fa2c4ee this test was passing by
accident as it had a -DAG suffix in the checks changed by this patch,
causing FileCheck to first match the last line of the output above
(instead of the first one), and then finding the FieldDecl above.
When I removed the -DAG suffix, FileCheck actually enforced the ordering
and started failing as the FieldDecl comes before the CXXRecordDecl match
we get.
This patch fixes the CXXRecordDecl check to find the first line of the output
above which caused FileCheck to also find the FieldDecl that follows. Also
gives the FieldDecl a more unique name to make name collisions less likely.
This test was generating the following false-positive warning when being compiled:
warning: class 'SomeClass' defined without specifying a base class [-Wobjc-root-class]
The current test is checking both the anonymous structs and the template
specializations in one FileCheck run, but the anonymous struct line can
partially match the AST dump of a template specialization, causing that
FileCheck won't match that same line later against the template specialization
check and incorrectly fails on that check. This only happens when the
template specialization node somehow ends up before the anonymous struct node.
This patch just puts the checks for the anonymous structs in their own FileCheck
run to prevent them from partially matching any other record decl.
Fixes rdar://62997926
We have the option to stop running commands in batch mode when an error
occurs. When that happens we should exit the driver with a non-zero exit
code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78825
Summary:
This was originally commented out as it broke the data-formatter-stl/libcxx/
tests. However this was fixed by commit ef423a3ba5
(Add Objective-C property accessors loaded from Clang module DWARF to lookup)
which sets the HasExternalVisibleStorage flag for the template specializations.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79168
The cause of this crash is relatively simple -- we are using a
SymbolFileDWARFDwo to parse a (skeleton) dwarf unit. This cause the
CompileUnit to be created with the wrong ID, which later triggers an
assertion in SymbolFile::SetCompileUnitAtIndex. The fix is also simple
-- ensure we use the right symbol file for parsing.
However, a fairly elaborate setup is needed trigger this bug, because
ParseCompileUnit is normally called very early on (and with the right
symbol file object) during the process of accessing a compile unit.
The only way this can be triggered is if the DWARF unit is
"accidentally" pulled into scope during expression evaluation
This can happen if the "this" object used for the context of an
expression is in a namespace, and that namespace is also present in
other compile units
The included test recreates this setup.
This patch fixes a bug when synthesizing an ObjC property from
-gmodules debug info. Because the method declaration that is injected
via the non-modular property implementation is not added to the
ObjCInterfaceDecl's lookup pointer, a second copy of the accessor
would be generated when processing the ObjCPropertyDecl. This can be
avoided by finding the existing method decl in
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks::FindExternalVisibleDeclsByName() and
adding it to the LookupPtr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78333
Summary:
The code in DWARFCompileUnit::BuildAddressRangeTable tries hard to avoid
relying on DW_AT_low/high_pc for compile unit range information, and
this logic is a big cause of llvm/lldb divergence in the lowest layers
of dwarf parsing code.
The implicit assumption in that code is that this information (as opposed to
DW_AT_ranges) is unreliable. However, I have not been able to verify
that assumption. It is definitely not true for all present-day
compilers (gcc, clang, icc), and it was also not the case for the
historic compilers that I have been able to get a hold of (thanks Matt
Godbolt).
All compiler included in my research either produced correct
DW_AT_ranges or .debug_aranges entries, or they produced no DW_AT_hi/lo
pc at all. The detailed findings are:
- gcc >= 4.4: produces DW_AT_ranges and .debug_aranges
- 4.1 <= gcc < 4.4: no DW_AT_ranges, no DW_AT_high_pc, .debug_aranges
present. The upper version range here is uncertain as godbolt.org does
not have intermediate versions.
- gcc < 4.1: no versions on godbolt.org
- clang >= 3.5: produces DW_AT_ranges, and (optionally) .debug_aranges
- 3.4 <= clang < 3.5: no DW_AT_ranges, no DW_AT_high_pc, .debug_aranges
present.
- clang <= 3.3: no DW_AT_ranges, no DW_AT_high_pc, no .debug_aranges
- icc >= 16.0.1: produces DW_AT_ranges
- icc < 16.0.1: no functional versions on godbolt.org (some are present
but fail to compile)
Based on this analysis, I believe it is safe to start trusting
DW_AT_low/high_pc information in dwarf as well as remove the code for
manually reconstructing range information by traversing the DIE
structure, and just keep the line table fallback. The only compilers
where this will change behavior are pre-3.4 clangs, which are almost 7
years old now. However, the functionality should remain unchanged
because we will be able to reconstruct this information from the line
table, which seems to be needed for some line-tables-only scenarios
anyway (haven't researched this too much, but at least some compilers
seem to emit DW_AT_ranges even in these situations).
In addition, benchmarks showed that for these compilers computing the
ranges via line tables is noticably faster than doing so via the DIE
tree.
Other advantages include simplifying the code base, removing some
untested code (the only test changes are recent tests with overly
reduced synthetic dwarf), and increasing llvm convergence.
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78489
This patch threads an lldb::DescriptionLevel through the typesystem to
allow dumping the full Clang AST (level=verbose) of any lldb::Type in
addition to the human-readable source description (default
level=full). This type dumping interface is currently not exposed
through the SBAPI.
The application is to let lldb-test dump the clang AST of search
results. I need this to test lazy type completion of clang types in
subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78329