Just enough to consume some bitcode files and link them. There's more
to be done around the symbol resolution API and the LTO config, but I don't yet
understand what all the various LTO settings do...
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd, smeenai, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90663
They operate like Defined symbols but with no associated InputSection.
Note that `ld64` seems to treat the weak definition flag like a no-op for
absolute symbols, so I have replicated that behavior.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87909
On Unix, it is traditionally allowed to write variable definitions without
initialization expressions (such as "int foo;") to header files. These are
called tentative definitions.
The compiler creates common symbols when it sees tentative definitions. When
linking the final binary, if there are remaining common symbols after name
resolution is complete, the linker converts them to regular defined symbols in
a `__common` section.
This diff implements most of that functionality, though we do not yet handle
the case where there are both common and non-common definitions of the same
symbol.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86909
The word "target" is overloaded, so lighten its load by using another word to denote the symbol or section to which a reloc points. While more stilted than "target", "referent" is rather less pompous than "designatum" or "denotatum". :P
Along the way, make a few neighboring variable names more descriptive.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87584
Previously, we were only emitting regular bindings to weak
dynamic symbols; this diff adds support for the weak bindings too, which
can overwrite the regular bindings at runtime. We also treat weak
defined global symbols similarly -- since they can also be interposed at
runtime, they need to be treated as potentially dynamic symbols.
Note that weak bindings differ from regular bindings in that they do not
specify the dylib to do the lookup in (i.e. weak symbol lookup happens
in a flat namespace.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86572
The re-exports list in a TAPI document can either refer to other inlined
TAPI documents, or to on-disk files (which may themselves be TBD or
regular files.) Similarly, the re-exports of a regular dylib can refer
to a TBD file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85404
Two things needed fixing for that to work:
1. getName() no longer returns null for DylibFiles constructed from TAPIs
2. markSubLibrary() now accepts .tbd as a possible extension
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86180
DylibFile doesn't store a pointer to its InterfaceFile
parameter, so there's no need to use a shared_ptr.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85402
References to symbols in dylibs work very similarly regardless of
whether the symbol is a TLV. The main difference is that we have a
separate `__thread_ptrs` section that acts as the GOT for these
thread-locals.
We can identify thread-locals in dylibs by a flag in their export trie
entries, and we cross-check it with the relocations that refer to them
to ensure that we are not using a GOT relocation to reference a
thread-local (or vice versa).
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85081
Handle command-line option `-sectcreate SEG SECT FILE`, which inputs a binary blob from `FILE` into `SEG,SECT`
Reviewed By: int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85501
This diff adds support for weak definitions, though it doesn't handle weak
symbols in dylibs quite correctly -- we need to emit binding opcodes for them
in the weak binding section rather than the lazy binding section.
What *is* covered in this diff:
1. Reading the weak flag from symbol table / export trie, and writing it to the
export trie
2. Refining the symbol table's rules for choosing one symbol definition over
another. Wrote a few dozen test cases to make sure we were matching ld64's
behavior.
We can now link basic C++ programs.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83532
Summary:
llvm-mc emits `__bss` sections with an offset of zero, but we weren't expecting
that in our input, so we were copying non-zero data from the start of the file and
putting it in `__bss`, with obviously undesirable runtime results. (It appears that
the kernel will copy those nonzero bytes as long as the offset is nonzero, regardless
of whether S_ZERO_FILL is set.)
I debated on whether to make a special ZeroFillSection -- separate from a
regular InputSection -- but it seemed like too much work for now. But I'm happy
to refactor if anyone feels strongly about having it as a separate class.
Depends on D80857.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80859
This removes the stub library that lld injected to satisfy the
dependency on the libSystem. Now with TBD support, we can provide the
stub library to permit the tests to function properly as they would on a
real system.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81418
Summary:
We should be reading / writing our addends / relocated addresses based on
r_length, and not just based on the type of the relocation. But since only
some r_length values are valid for a given reloc type, I've also added some
validation.
ld64 has code to allow for r_length = 0 in X86_64_RELOC_BRANCH relocs, but I'm
not sure how to create such a relocation...
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80854
Add support to lld to use Text Based API stubs for linking. This is
support is incomplete not filtering out platforms. It also does not
account for architecture specific API handling and potentially does not
correctly handle trees of re-exports with inlined libraries being
treated as direct children of the top level library.
My test refactoring in D80217 seems to have caused yaml2obj to emit
unaligned nlist_64 structs, causing ASAN'd lld to be unhappy. I don't
think this is an issue with yaml2obj though -- llvm-mc also seems to
emit unaligned nlist_64s. This diff makes lld able to safely do aligned
reads under ASAN builds while hopefully creating no overhead for regular
builds on architectures that support unaligned reads.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80414
I considered making a `Target::validate()` method, but I wasn't sure how
I felt about the overhead of doing yet another switch-dispatch on the
relocation type, so I put the validation in `relocateOne` instead...
might be a bit of a micro-optimization, but `relocateOne` does assume
certain things about the relocations it gets, and this error handling
makes that explicit, so it's not a totally unreasonable code
organization.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80049
Summary:
This diff restores and builds upon @pcc and @ruiu's initial work on
subsections.
The .subsections_via_symbols directive indicates we can split each
section along symbol boundaries, unless those symbols have been marked
with `.alt_entry`.
We exercise this functionality in our tests by using order files that
rearrange those symbols.
Depends on D79668.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: thakis, llvm-commits, pcc, ruiu
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79926
This diff restores and builds upon @pcc and @ruiu's initial work on
subsections.
The .subsections_via_symbols directive indicates we can split each
section along symbol boundaries, unless those symbols have been marked
with `.alt_entry`.
We exercise this functionality in our tests by using order files that
rearrange those symbols.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79926
The order file indicates how input sections should be sorted within each
output section, based on the symbols contained within those sections.
This diff sets the stage for implementing and testing
`.subsections_via_symbols`, where we will break up InputSections by each
symbol and sort them more granularly.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79668
With this change, basic archive files can be linked together. Input
section discovery has been refactored into a function since archive
files lazily resolve their symbols / the object files containing those
symbols.
Reviewed By: int3, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78342
This unblocks the linking of real programs, since many core system
functions are only available as sub-libraries of libSystem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79228
Summary:
This allows us to link against stripped dylibs. Moreover, it's simply
more correct: The symbol table includes symbols that the dylib uses but
doesn't export.
This temporarily regresses our ability to do lazy symbol binding because
dyld_stub_binder isn't in libSystem's export trie. Rather, it is in one
of the sub-libraries libSystem re-exports. (This doesn't affect our
tests since we are mocking out dyld_stub_binder there.) A follow-up diff
will address this by adding support for sub-libraries.
Depends on D79114.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79226
Summary:
This diff implements lazy symbol binding -- very similar to the PLT
mechanism in ELF.
ELF's .plt section is broken up into two sections in Mach-O:
StubsSection and StubHelperSection. Calls to functions in dylibs will
end up calling into StubsSection, which contains indirect jumps to
addresses stored in the LazyPointerSection (the counterpart to ELF's
.plt.got).
Initially, the LazyPointerSection contains addresses that point into one
of the entry points in the middle of the StubHelperSection. The code in
StubHelperSection will push on the stack an offset into the
LazyBindingSection. The push is followed by a jump to the beginning of
the StubHelperSection (similar to PLT0), which then calls into
dyld_stub_binder. dyld_stub_binder is a non-lazily bound symbol, so this
call looks it up in the GOT.
The stub binder will look up the bind opcodes in the LazyBindingSection
at the given offset. The bind opcodes will tell the binder to update the
address in the LazyPointerSection to point to the symbol, so that
subsequent calls don't have to redo the symbol resolution. The binder
will then jump to the resolved symbol.
Depends on D78269.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78270
Summary: Similar to other formats, input sections in the MachO
implementation are now grouped under output sections. This is primarily
a refactor, although there's some new logic (like resolving the output
section's flags based on its inputs).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77893
This diff implements:
* dylib loading (much of which is being restored from @pcc and @ruiu's
original work)
* The GOT_LOAD relocation, which allows us to load non-lazy dylib
symbols
* Basic bind opcode emission, which tells `dyld` how to populate the GOT
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76252
Summary:
This is the first commit for the new Mach-O backend, designed to roughly
follow the architecture of the existing ELF and COFF backends, and
building off work that @ruiu and @pcc did in a branch a while back. Note
that this is a very stripped-down commit with the bare minimum of
functionality for ease of review. We'll be following up with more diffs
soon.
Currently, we're able to generate a simple "Hello World!" executable
that runs on OS X Catalina (and possibly on earlier OS X versions; I
haven't tested them). (This executable can be obtained by compiling
`test/MachO/relocations.s`.) We're mocking out a few load commands to
achieve this -- for example, we can't load dynamic libraries, but
Catalina requires binaries to be linked against `dyld`, so we hardcode
the emission of a `LC_LOAD_DYLIB` command. Other mocked out load
commands include LC_SYMTAB and LC_DYSYMTAB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75382
Jez Ng