Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_DWORD[_X2,X3,X4] and mostly behave like
llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format. They will be used by Mesa for SSBO and
atomic counters at least when robust buffer access behavior is desired.
(These instructions perform no format conversion and do buffer range checking
per component.)
As a side effect of sharing patterns with llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format,
it has become trivial to add support for the f32 and v2f32 variants of that
intrinsic, so the patch does so.
Also DAG-ify (and fix) some tests that I noticed intermittent failures in
while developing this patch.
Some tests were (temporarily) adjusted for the required mayLoad/hasSideEffects
changes to the BUFFER_STORE_DWORD* instructions. See also
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18291.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18292
llvm-svn: 266126
This makes it possible to distinguish between mesa shaders
and other kernels even in the presence of compute shaders.
Patch By: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18559
llvm-svn: 265589
Summary:
Instead of trying to replace SMRD instructions with a VGPR base pointer
with an equivalent MUBUF instruction, we now copy the base pointer to
SGPRs using v_readfirstlane.
This is safe to do, because any load selected as an SMRD instruction
has been proven to have a uniform base pointer, so each thread in the
wave will have the same pointer value in VGPRs.
This will fix some errors on VI from trying to replace SMRD instructions
with addr64-enabled MUBUF instructions that don't exist.
Reviewers: arsenm, cfang, nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17305
llvm-svn: 261385
noduplicate prevents unrolling of small loops that happen to have
barriers in them. If a loop has a barrier in it, it is OK to duplicate
it for the unroll.
llvm-svn: 256075
Trying to use the version with the explicit output operand
would complain because of the missing WriteSALU. I'm not sure
why it doesn't complain about this with the implicit VCC def.
llvm-svn: 248646
Nicolai Haehnle