Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Summary:
This patch partially reverts the commit rL356849.
Unfortunately, tooling::createExecutorFromCommandLineArgs doesn't
corperate well with our internal infrastructure, which leads failing
lit tests. We use ClangTool at the moment, until we find a better
solution to smooth it.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59764
llvm-svn: 356893
Use InitLLVM and WithColor
Delete PPTraceConsumer, add the callback in PPTraceAction
Migrae to tooling::createExecutorFromCommandLineArgs
Don't specialize empty OutputFileName
llvm-svn: 356849
Summary:
-ignore specifies a list of PP callbacks to ignore. It cannot express a
whitelist, which may be more useful than a blacklist.
Add a new option -callbacks to replace it.
-ignore= (default) => -callbacks='*' (default)
-ignore=FileChanged,FileSkipped => -callbacks='*,-FileChanged,-FileSkipped'
-callbacks='Macro*' : print only MacroDefined,MacroExpands,MacroUndefined,...
Reviewers: juliehockett, aaron.ballman, alexfh, ioeric
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59296
llvm-svn: 356366
__pragma(execution_character_set(push, "UTF-8")) is used in
TraceLoggingProvider.h. This commit implements a no-op handler for
compatability, similar to how the flag -fexec_charset is handled.
Patch by Matt Gardner!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58530
llvm-svn: 356185
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This commit relands r331905.
r331904 added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
llvm-svn: 332023
[revision] added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46615
llvm-svn: 331905
Summary:
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is Clang-tools-extra part.
Clang part is D43779.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: ioeric, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43780
llvm-svn: 326202
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
This function was previously making (correct) assumptions
without complete knowledge of MacroArgs guarantees for
Arguments. After going through Macro Args a bunch, I'd
corrected the getNumArguments (and changed its name),
however didn't realize this was depending on the behavior.
This patch has version that depends on the corrected
getNumMacroArguments's behavior, with the rest checked against
my knowledge of the MacroArgs' token list. Commiting no-wait
since the test is broken.
llvm-svn: 305434
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
-J. Robert Oppenheimer
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, echristo
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16475
llvm-svn: 258864
After post-commit review and community discussion, this seems like a
reasonable direction to continue, making ownership semantics explicit in
the source using the type system.
llvm-svn: 215324
This reverts commit r213308.
Reverting to have some on-list discussion/confirmation about the ongoing
direction of smart pointer usage in the LLVM project.
llvm-svn: 213324
Jonas Devlieghere