Aligned new does not require size to be a multiple of alignment, so
memalign is the correct choice instead of aligned_alloc.
Fixes false reports for unaligned sizes.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119161
Fixes segfaults on x86_64 caused by instrumented code running before
shadow is set up.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118171
setjmp can return twice, but PostDominatorTree is unaware of this. as
such, it overestimates postdominance, leaving some cases (see attached
compiler-rt) where memory does not get untagged on return. this causes
false positives later in the program execution.
this is a crude workaround to unblock use-after-scope for now, in the
longer term PostDominatorTree should bemade aware of returns_twice
function, as this may cause problems elsewhere.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118647
Fixes a false positive that occurs when a user-implemented memmove is
instrumented by HWASan.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118180
Larger blocks are more convenient for compressions.
Blocks are allocated with MmapNoReserveOrDie to save some memory.
Also it's 15% faster on StackDepotBenchmarkSuite
Depends on D114464.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114488
I recently spent some extra time debugging a false positive because I
didn't realize the "real" tag was in the short granule. Adding the
short tag here makes it more obvious that we could be dealing with a
short granule.
Reviewed By: hctim, eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112949
Previously we only applied it to the first one, which could allow
subsequent global tags to exceed the valid number of bits.
Reviewed By: hctim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112853
Allows us to use the small code model when we disable relocation
relaxation.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111344
On newer glibc, this test detects an extra match somewhere under
pthread_getattr_np. This results in Thread: lines getting spread out in
the report and failing to match the CHECKs.
Fix the CHECKs to allow this possibility.
Reviewed By: fmayer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111841
This is important as with exceptions enabled, non-POD allocas often have
two lifetime ends: the exception handler, and the normal one.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108365
In that case it is very likely that there will be a tag mismatch anyway.
We handle the case that the pointer belongs to neither of the allocators
by getting a nullptr from allocator.GetBlockBegin.
Reviewed By: hctim, eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108383
Fixes a regression when the allocator is disabled, and a dirty
allocation is re-used. This only occurs when the allocator is disabled,
so a test-only fix, but still necessary.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108650
The shadow for a short granule is stored in the last byte of the
granule. Currently, if there's a tail-overwrite report (a
buffer-overflow-write in uninstrumented code), we report the shadow byte
as a mismatch against the magic.
Fix this bug by slapping the shadow into the expected value. This also
makes sure that if the uninstrumented WRITE does clobber the shadow
byte, it reports the shadow was actually clobbered as well.
Reviewed By: eugenis, fmayer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107938
Before this change we were locking the StackDepot in the fork()
interceptor. This results in a deadlock when allocator functions are
used in a pthread_atfork() callback.
Instead, set up a pthread_atfork() callback at init that locks/unlocks
both StackDepot and the allocator. Since our callback is set up very
early, the pre-fork callback is executed late, and both post-fork ones
are executed early, which works perfect for us.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108063
Since d564cfb53c moved
__hwasan_tag_mismatch4 this test has been reporting
a frame 0 of __hwasan_tag_mismatch_v2.
This failure can be seen on our bots:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/185/builds/170
Before the change:
#0 0xaaaaba100e40 in main <...>/register-dump-read.c:21:10
After the change:
#0 0xaaaab8494bec in __hwasan_tag_mismatch_v2 <...>/hwasan/hwasan_tag_mismatch_aarch64.S:147
#1 0xaaaab84b4df8 in main <..>/register-dump-read.c:14:10
Update the test to check for a main frame as either frame
0 or frame 1.
The existing one actually failed on the int* p, not on int z (as can be
seen by the fault being 8 bytes rather than 4).
This is also needed to make sure the stack safety analysis does not
classify the alloca as safe.
Reviewed By: hctim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105705
We would find an address with matching tag, only to discover in
ShowCandidate that it's very far away from [stack].
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105197
If the fault address is at the boundary of memory regions, this could
cause us to segfault otherwise.
Ran test with old compiler_rt to make sure it fails.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105032
A heap or global buffer that is far away from the faulting address is
unlikely to be the cause, especially if there is a potential
use-after-free as well, so we want to show it after the other
causes.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104781
Matt Morehouse