code to find and add Objective-C methods (starting at an
ObjCContainerDecl) into a single, static function. Also, make sure
that we search into the implementations of classes and categories to
find even more methods.
llvm-svn: 89163
- Provide Sema in callbacks, instead of requiring it in constructor. This
eliminates the need for a factory function. Clients now just pass the object
to consume the results in directly.
- CodeCompleteConsumer is cheap to construct, so building it whenever we are
doing code completion is reasonable.
Doug, please review.
llvm-svn: 87099
- Introduce more code-completion string "chunk" kinds that describe
symbols, the actual text that the user is expected to type, etc.
- Make the generation of macro results optional, since it can be
slow
- Make code-completion accessible through the C API, marshalling the
code-completion results through a temporary file (ick) to maintain
process separation.
The last doesn't have tests yet.
llvm-svn: 86306
types. Preserve it through template instantiation. Preserve it through PCH,
although TSTs themselves aren't serializable, so that's pretty much meaningless.
llvm-svn: 85500
qualified reference to a declaration that is not a non-static data
member or non-static member function, e.g.,
namespace N { int i; }
int j = N::i;
Instead, extend DeclRefExpr to optionally store the qualifier. Most
clients won't see or care about the difference (since
QualifierDeclRefExpr inherited DeclRefExpr). However, this reduces the
number of top-level expression types that clients need to cope with,
brings the implementation of DeclRefExpr into line with MemberExpr,
and simplifies and unifies our handling of declaration references.
Extended DeclRefExpr to (optionally) store explicitly-specified
template arguments. This occurs when naming a declaration via a
template-id (which will be stored in a TemplateIdRefExpr) that,
following template argument deduction and (possibly) overload
resolution, is replaced with a DeclRefExpr that refers to a template
specialization but maintains the template arguments as written.
llvm-svn: 84962
- Filter out unnamed declarations
- Filter out declarations whose names are reserved for the
implementation (e.g., __bar, _Foo)
- Place OVERLOAD: or COMPLETION: at the beginning of each
code-completion result, so we can easily separate them from other
compilation results.
llvm-svn: 83680
lookup in a member access expression always start a
nested-name-specifier. Additionally, rank names that start
nested-name-specifiers after other names.
llvm-svn: 82663
results for other, textual completion. For call completion, we now
produce enough information to show the function call argument that we
are currently on.
llvm-svn: 82592
members found in base classes have the same ranking as members found
in derived classes. However, we will introduce an informative note for
members found in base classes, showing (as a nested-name-specifier)
the qualification to name the base class, to make it clear which
members are from bases.
llvm-svn: 82586
opening parentheses and after each comma. We gather the set of visible
overloaded functions, perform "partial" overloading based on the set
of arguments that we have thus far, and return the still-viable
results sorted by the likelihood that they will be the best candidate.
Most of the changes in this patch are a refactoring of the overloading
routines for a function call, since we needed to separate out the
notion of building an overload set (common to code-completion and
normal semantic analysis) and then what to do with that overload
set. As part of this change, I've pushed explicit template arguments
into a few more subroutines.
There is still much more work to do in this area. Function templates
won't be handled well (unless we happen to deduce all of the template
arguments before we hit the completion point), nor will overloaded
function-call operators or calls to member functions.
llvm-svn: 82549
a nested-name-specifier that describes how to refer to that name. For
example, given:
struct Base { int member; };
struct Derived : Base { int member; };
the code-completion result for a member access into "Derived" will
provide both "member" to refer to Derived::member (no qualification needed) and
"Base::member" to refer to Base::member (qualification included).
llvm-svn: 82476
enumerators when either the user intentionally wrote a qualified name
(in which case we just use that nested-name-specifier to match
the user's code) or when this is the first "case" statement and we
need a qualified name to refer to an enumerator in a different scope.
llvm-svn: 82474
- after "using", show anything that can be a nested-name-specifier.
- after "using namespace", show any visible namespaces or namespace aliases
- after "namespace", show any namespace definitions in the current scope
- after "namespace identifier = ", show any visible namespaces or
namespace aliases
llvm-svn: 82251
will provide the names of various enumerations currently
visible. Introduced filtering of code-completion results when we build
the result set, so that we can identify just the kinds of declarations
we want.
This implementation is incomplete for C++, since we don't consider
that the token after the tag keyword could start a
nested-name-specifier.
llvm-svn: 82222
essence, code completion is triggered by a magic "code completion"
token produced by the lexer [*], which the parser recognizes at
certain points in the grammar. The parser then calls into the Action
object with the appropriate CodeCompletionXXX action.
Sema implements the CodeCompletionXXX callbacks by performing minimal
translation, then forwarding them to a CodeCompletionConsumer
subclass, which uses the results of semantic analysis to provide
code-completion results. At present, only a single, "printing" code
completion consumer is available, for regression testing and
debugging. However, the design is meant to permit other
code-completion consumers.
This initial commit contains two code-completion actions: one for
member access, e.g., "x." or "p->", and one for
nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "std::". More code-completion actions
will follow, along with improved gathering of code-completion results
for the various contexts.
[*] In the current -code-completion-dump testing/debugging mode, the
file is truncated at the completion point and EOF is translated into
"code completion".
llvm-svn: 82166
Douglas Gregor