Specifically, don't print snippets, caret diagnostics, or ranges for
lines over 4096 characters. We copy the line around a few times in our
diagnostics machinery, and we have to print a caret line that's just as
long. This uses a lot of memory just to create a poor user experience as
we print out a line much too long for anyone to read...or spend extra
energy trying to fit it to -fmessage-length.
<rdar://problem/13106850>
llvm-svn: 173976
-f(no-)color-diagnostics. In addition, dumpColor() function calls are added
to force color printing. No structural changes to -ast-dump.
llvm-svn: 173548
Presumably, if the printf format has the sign explicitly requested, the user
wants to treat the data as signed.
This is a fix-up for r172739, and also includes several test changes that
didn't make it into that commit.
llvm-svn: 172762
This is inspired by a number of false positives in real code, including
PR14968. I've added test cases reduced from these false positives to
test/Sema/unused-expr.c, as well as corresponding test cases that pass the
offending expressions as arguments to a no-op macro to ensure that we do warn
there.
This also removes my previous tweak from r166522/r166534, so that we warn on
unused cast expressions in macro arguments.
There were several test cases that were using -Wunused-value to test general
diagnostic emission features; I changed those to use other warnings or warn on
a macro argument expression. I stared at the test case for PR14399 for a while
with Richard Smith and we believe the new test case exercises the same
codepaths as before.
llvm-svn: 172696
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D269
"Added dumping of declaration comments in ASTDumper. This required moving the
comment dumping code from CommentDumper so that the indentation is correct."
Patch by Philip Craig!
llvm-svn: 172409
produce a note for that diagnostic either with a different DiagnosticEngine or
after calling DiagnosticEngine::Reset(). That didn't make any sense, and did the
wrong thing if the original diagnostic was suppressed.
llvm-svn: 170636
This still isn't quite right, but it fixes a crash.
I factored out findCommonParent because we need it on the result of
getImmediateExpansionRange: for a function macro, the beginning
and end of an expansion range can come out of different
macros/macro arguments, which means the resulting range is a complete
mess to handle consistently.
I also made some changes to how findCommonParent works; it works somewhat
better in some cases, and somewhat worse in others, but I think overall
it's a better balance. I'm coming to the conclusion that mapDiagnosticRanges
isn't using the right algorithm, though: chasing the caret is fundamentally
more complicated than any algorithm which only considers one FileID for the
caret can handle because each SourceLocation doesn't really have a single parent.
We need to follow the same path of choosing expansion locations and spelling
locations which the caret used to come up with the correct range
in the general case.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12847524>.
llvm-svn: 170049
Fixes a crash printing diagnostics on the gcc testsuite, and also makes
diagnostic range printing print nicer results for token pastes.
llvm-svn: 169068
working with preprocessed testcases. This causes source locations in
diagnostics to point at the spelling location instead of the presumed location,
while still keeping the semantic effects of the line directives (entering and
leaving system-header mode, primarily).
llvm-svn: 168004
caret locations and source ranges in macros. Makes ranges more accurate
in some cases, and fixes an assertion failure.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12472249>.
llvm-svn: 167353
we had the -ccc-clang-cxx and -ccc-no-clang-cxx options to force them
on or off for testing.
Clang c++ support is now production quality and these options are dead.
llvm-svn: 166986
clang itself. This dates back to clang's early days and while it looks like
some of it is still used (for kext for example), other parts are probably dead.
Remove the -ccc-clang-archs option and associated code. I don't think there
is any remaining setup where clang doesn't support an architecture but it can
expect an working gcc cross compiler to be available.
A nice side effect is that tests no longer need to differentiate architectures
that are included in production builds of clang and those that are not.
llvm-svn: 165545
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 163831
middle of UTF-8 characters, and avoid walking to such positions when adjusting
column ranges for display. Fixes a couple of hangs when rendering diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 163820
While -Wpedantic was reasonable, -Wno-pedantic would turn off a bunch of warnings that
are on by default. This counters the intention of this warning flag.
To fix this, -Wpedantic now includes extentions that are not on by default. The
remaining warnings will manifest anyway, and won't accidentally get turned off
by -Wno-pedantic.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12076105>
llvm-svn: 161695
'clang-cpp'.
For now, the test uses "REQUIRES: shell" to determine if the host system
supports "ln -s", which it uses to create a 'clang-cpp' symlink. This is a bit
hacky and should likely be directly supported by lit.cfg.
llvm-svn: 161317
scope to -Wc++11-extensions. Move extra semicolon after member function
definition diagnostic out of -pedantic, since C++ allows a single semicolon
there. Keep it in -Wextra-semi, though, since it's still questionable.
llvm-svn: 160618
- Split pedantic driver flag test into separate test file, and XFAIL on cygwin,mingw32
- Fix bug in tablegen logic where a missing '{' caused errors to be included in -Wpedantic.
llvm-svn: 159892
I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test.
> 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp
llvm-svn: 159886
This patch introduces some magic in tablegen to create a "Pedantic" diagnostic
group which automagically includes all warnings that are extensions. This
allows a user to suppress specific warnings traditionally under -pedantic used
an ordinary warning flag. This also allows users to use #pragma to silence
specific -pedantic warnings, or promote them to errors, within blocks of text
(just like any other warning).
-Wpedantic is NOT an alias for -pedantic. Instead, it provides another way
to (a) activate -pedantic warnings and (b) disable them. Where they differ
is that -pedantic changes the behavior of the preprocessor slightly, whereas
-Wpedantic does not (it just turns on the warnings).
The magic in the tablegen diagnostic emitter has to do with computing the minimal
set of diagnostic groups and diagnostics that should go into -Wpedantic, as those
diagnostics that already members of groups that themselves are (transitively) members
of -Wpedantic do not need to be included in the Pedantic group directly. I went
back and forth on whether or not to magically generate this group, and the invariant
was that we always wanted extension warnings to be included in -Wpedantic "some how",
but the bookkeeping would be very onerous to manage by hand.
-no-pedantic (and --no-pedantic) is included for completeness, and matches many of the
same kind of flags the compiler already supports. It does what it says: cancels out
-pedantic. One discrepancy is that if one specifies --no-pedantic and -Weverything or
-Wpedantic the pedantic warnings are still enabled (essentially the -W flags win). We
can debate the correct behavior here.
Along the way, this patch nukes some code in TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp and CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp
that determine whether to include the "-pedantic" flag in the warning output. This is
no longer needed, as all extensions now have a -W flag.
This patch also significantly reduces the number of warnings not under flags from 229
to 158 (all extension warnings). That's a 31% reduction.
llvm-svn: 159875
is selected. This will allow more flexibility when converting diagnostics to
use template type diffing.
Also updated the internal manual and test cases for correctly keeping the bold
attribute and for tree printing.
llvm-svn: 159463
undefined behaviour, and move the diagnostic for '' from an Error into
an ExtWarn in this group. This is important for some users of the preprocessor,
and is necessary for gcc compatibility.
llvm-svn: 159335
comparison between two templated types when they both appear in a diagnostic.
Type elision will remove indentical template arguments, which can be disabled
with -fno-elide-type. Cyan highlighting is applied to the differing types.
For more formatting, -fdiagnostic-show-template-tree will output the template
type as an indented text tree, with differences appearing inline. Template
tree works with or without type elision.
llvm-svn: 159216
because it expects a reference and receives a non-l-value.
For example, given:
int foo(int &);
template<int x> void b() { foo(x); }
clang will now print "expects an l-value for 1st argument" instead of
"no known conversion from 'int' to 'int &' for 1st argument". The change
in wording (and associated code to detect the case) was prompted by
comment #5 in PR3104, and should be the last bit of work needed for the
bug.
llvm-svn: 158691
The preprocessor's handling of diagnostic push/pops is stateful, so
encountering pragmas during a re-parse causes problems. HTMLRewrite
already filters out normal # directives including #pragma, so it's
clear it's not expected to be interpreting pragmas in this mode.
This fix adds a flag to Preprocessor to explicitly disable pragmas.
The "right" fix might be to separate pragma lexing from pragma
parsing so that we can throw away pragmas like we do preprocessor
directives, but right now it's important to get the fix in.
Note that this has nothing to do with the "hack" of re-using the
input preprocessor in HTMLRewrite. Even if we someday copy the
preprocessor instead of re-using it, the copy would (and should) include
the diagnostic level tables and have the same problems.
llvm-svn: 158214
In standard C since C89, a 'translation-unit' is syntactically defined to have
at least one "external-declaration", which is either a decl or a function
definition. In Clang the latter gives us a declaration as well.
The tricky bit about this warning is that our predefines can contain external
declarations (__builtin_va_list and the 128-bit integer types). Therefore our
AST parser now makes sure we have at least one declaration that doesn't come
from the predefines buffer.
Also, remove bogus warning about empty source files. This doesn't catch source
files that only contain comments, and never fired anyway because of our
predefines.
PR12665 and <rdar://problem/9165548>
llvm-svn: 158085
Before:
test.cc:2:18: note: place parentheses around the == expression to silence this warning
if (0 == flags & 0xdd)
^
( )
Now:
test.cc:2:18: note: place parentheses around the == expression to silence this warning
if (0 == flags & 0xdd)
^
( )
llvm-svn: 157897
show-enabled uses the command line you give it to build a CompilerInstance,
so any flags you pass will be processed as if running clang proper.
llvm-svn: 157842
Jordan Rose