Summary:
Instead of traversing inside the TraverseDecl() function.
Previously the attributes were traversed after Travese(Some)Decl
returns.
Logically attributes are properties of particular Decls and should be
traversed alongside other "child" nodes.
None of the tests relied on this behavior, hopefully this is an indication
that the change is relatively safe.
This change started with a discussion on cfe-dev, for details see:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062899.html
Reviewers: rsmith, gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64907
llvm-svn: 368052
We reorder declarations in RecordDecls because they may have another order
in the "to" context than they have in the "from" context. This may happen
e.g when we import a class like this:
struct declToImport {
int a = c + b;
int b = 1;
int c = 2;
};
During the import of `a` we import first the dependencies in sequence,
thus the order would be `c`, `b`, `a`. We will get the normal order by
first removing the already imported members and then adding them in the
order as they apper in the "from" context.
Keeping field order is vital because it determines structure layout.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44100
llvm-svn: 366997
Summary:
We falsely state inequivalence if the template parameter is a
qualified/nonquialified template in the first/second instantiation.
Also, different kinds of TemplateName should be equal if the template
decl (if available) is equal (even if the name kind is different).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64241
llvm-svn: 366818
Summary:
The structural equivalence check reported false eq between lambda classes
with different parameters in their call signature.
The solution is to check the methods for equality too in case of lambda
classes.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64075
llvm-svn: 366332
Summary:
With LLDB we use localUncachedLookup(), however, that fails to find
Decls when a transparent context is involved and the given DC has
external lexical storage. The solution is to use noload_lookup, which
works well with transparent contexts. But, we cannot use only the
noload_lookup since the slow case of localUncachedLookup is still needed
in some other cases.
These other cases are handled in ASTImporterLookupTable, but we cannot
use that with LLDB since that traverses through the AST which initiates
the load of external decls again via DC::decls().
We must avoid loading external decls during the import becuase
ExternalASTSource is implemented with ASTImporter, so external loads
during import results in uncontrolled and faulty import.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, jingham, clayborg, a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61333
llvm-svn: 366325
Summary:
These tests may work with C++14 language constructs in the future
(variable templates and others).
To avoid warnings about language version C++ version constants in the tests
are updated.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64477
llvm-svn: 366061
Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between enums with same name in different translation
units if these are not visible outside.
("Scoped enums" are not handled yet.)
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62484
llvm-svn: 365464
Summary:
The current import implementation fails to import the definition of a
lambda class if the lambda class is defined in a function param.
E.g., the lambda class below will be imported without any methods:
```
template <typename F>
void f(F L = [](){}) {}
```
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64073
llvm-svn: 365315
Summary:
Now we store the errors for the Decls in the "to" context too. For
that, however, we have to put these errors in a shared state (among all
the ASTImporter objects which handle the same "to" context but different
"from" contexts).
After a series of imports from different "from" TUs we have a "to" context
which may have erroneous nodes in it. (Remember, the AST is immutable so
there is no way to delete a node once we had created it and we realized
the error later.) All these erroneous nodes are marked in
ASTImporterSharedState::ImportErrors. Clients of the ASTImporter may
use this as an input. E.g. the static analyzer engine may not try to
analyze a function if that is marked as erroneous (it can be queried via
ASTImporterSharedState::getImportDeclErrorIfAny()).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62376
llvm-svn: 364785
Summary:
During import of a specific Decl D, it may happen that some AST nodes
had already been created before we recognize an error. In this case we
signal back the error to the caller, but the "to" context remains
polluted with those nodes which had been created. Ideally, those nodes
should not had been created, but that time we did not know about the
error, the error happened later. Since the AST is immutable (most of
the cases we can't remove existing nodes) we choose to mark these nodes
as erroneous.
Here are the steps of the algorithm:
1) We keep track of the nodes which we visit during the import of D: See
ImportPathTy.
2) If a Decl is already imported and it is already on the import path
(we have a cycle) then we copy/store the relevant part of the import
path. We store these cycles for each Decl.
3) When we recognize an error during the import of D then we set up this
error to all Decls in the stored cycles for D and we clear the stored
cycles.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62375
llvm-svn: 364771
Summary:
During analysis of one project we failed to import one
CXXDestructorDecl. But since we did not propagate the error in
importDeclContext we had a CXXRecordDecl without a destructor. Then the
analyzer engine had a CallEvent where the nonexistent dtor was requested
(crash).
Solution is to propagate the errors we have during importing a
DeclContext.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63603
llvm-svn: 364752
Summary:
We add a new member which is a mapping from the already-imported
declarations in the "from" context to the error status of the import of
that declaration. This map contains only the declarations that were not
correctly imported. The same declaration may or may not be included in
ImportedDecls. This map is updated continuously during imports and never
cleared (like ImportedDecls). In Import(Decl*) we use this mapping, so
if there was a previous failed import we return with the existing error.
We add/remove from the Lookuptable in consistency with ImportedFromDecls.
When we map a decl in the 'to' context to something in the 'from'
context then and only then we add it to the lookup table. When we
remove a mapping then and only then we remove it from the lookup table.
This patch is the first in a series of patches whose aim is to further
strengthen the error handling in ASTImporter.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62373
llvm-svn: 364279
Summary:
In most cases the FriendDecl contains the declaration of the befriended
class as a child node, so it is discovered during the recursive
visitation. However, there are cases when the befriended class is not a
child, thus it must be fetched explicitly from the FriendDecl, and only
then can we add it to the lookup table.
(Note, this does affect only CTU and does not affect LLDB, because we
cannot and do not use the ASTImporterLookupTable in LLDB.)
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62064
llvm-svn: 363062
Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between classes with same name in different
translation units if these are not visible outside. These classes are not linked
into one decl chain.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62312
llvm-svn: 361752
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438
llvm-svn: 360760
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
Summary:
We are currently implementing support in LLDB that reconstructs the STL templates from
the target program in the expression evaluator. This reconstruction happens during the
import process from our debug info AST into the expression evaluation AST, which means
we need a way to intercept the ASTImporter import process.
This patch adds an protected ImportImpl method that we can overwrite in LLDB to implement
our special importing logic (which is essentially just looking into a C++ module that is attached to
the target context). Because ImportImpl has to call MapImported/AddToLookup for the decls it
creates, this patch also exposes those via a new unified method and checks that we call it when
importing decls.
Reviewers: martong, balazske, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits, lldb-commits, aprantl
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59485
llvm-svn: 359502
ObjCPropertyDecl should use the category interface as a context similar to what is done for methods.
Previously category methods would be printed as `::property`; now they are printed as `Class::property`.
llvm-svn: 357720
FileManager constructs a VFS in its constructor if it isn't passed one,
and there's no way to reset it. Make that contract clear by returning a
reference from its accessor.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59388
llvm-svn: 357038
Summary: rL356570 introduced a test which only passes with the default openmp library, libomp, and fails with other openmp libraries, such as libgomp. Explicitly choose libomp.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: guansong, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59609
llvm-svn: 356614
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
Summary:
Redecl chains of function template specializations are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58668
llvm-svn: 356455
Summary:
Redecl chains of class template specializations are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58673
llvm-svn: 356452
Summary:
Import type location in case of TypeSpec and TypeSpecWithTemplate.
Without this fix the imported NespedNameSpecifierLoc will have an
invalid begin location.
Reviewers: a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin, martong
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, jdoerfert, dkrupp, martong, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55358
llvm-svn: 356151
Summary:
Member expressions with explicit template arguments were not imported
correctly: the DeclRefExpr was missing. This patch fixes.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58830
llvm-svn: 355596
Summary:
Redecl chains of function templates are not handled well currently. We
want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to keep the
structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is to not
squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and put them
in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58494
llvm-svn: 355593
Summary:
Redecl chains of classes and class templates are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58502
llvm-svn: 355390
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
This was originally reviewed and approved in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292 and submitted as r354832. It was
reverted in r354839 due to failures on the Windows CI builds.
This version fixes the test failures on Windows, which were caused by
differences in template expansion between versions of clang on different
OSes. The version of clang built with MSVC and running on Windows never
expands the template in the C++ test in ImportExpr.ImportChooseExpr in
clang/unittests/AST/ASTImporter.cpp, but the version on Linux does for
the empty arguments and -fms-compatibility.
So, this version of the patch drops the C++ test for
__builtin_choose_expr, since that version was written to catch
regressions of the logic for isConditionTrue() in the AST import code
for ChooseExpr, and those regressions are also caught by
ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase.ImportChooseExpr, which does work on
Windows.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman, rnk, a.sidorin
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jdoerfert, rnkovacs, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58663
llvm-svn: 354916
Anton Bikineev