Committing after fixing suggested changes and tested release/debug builds on
x86_64-linux and arm/aarch64 builds.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29042
llvm-svn: 293850
Summary: This adds a fallback in case that the Intel compiler is failed to be detected correctly.
Reviewers: chapuni
Reviewed By: chapuni
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27610
llvm-svn: 293230
In r292256, we started adding -fsanitize-use-after-scope when using
the address sanitizer, but that flag wasn't always available. This
fixes the config to only add the flag if the host compiler supports
it.
llvm-svn: 292423
Update SOVERSION to use just the major version number rather than
major+minor, to match the new versioning scheme where only major is used
to indicate API/ABI version.
Since two-digit SOVERSIONs were introduced post 3.9 branching, this
change does not risk any SOVERSION collisions. In the past,
two-component X.Y SOVERSIONs were shortly used but those will not
interfere with the new ones since the new versions start at 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28730
llvm-svn: 292255
Summary:
This string parameter is passed to -fuse-ld when linking. It can be
an absolute path to your custom linker, otherwise clang will look for
`ld.{name}`.
Reviewers: davide, tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28738
llvm-svn: 292047
Summary:
libstdc++ has some undefined behavior in bits/stl_tree.h that
has recently became excercised by some of the LLVM code.
Given that fixing libstdc++ will take years, adding the file
into a blacklist to fix bots seems like a necessity.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28686
llvm-svn: 291918
I have two immediate motivations for adding this:
1) It makes writing expectations in tests *dramatically* easier. A
quick example that is a taste of what is possible:
std::vector<int> v = ...;
EXPECT_THAT(v, UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3));
This checks that v contains '1', '2', and '3' in some order. There
are a wealth of other helpful matchers like this. They tend to be
highly generic and STL-friendly so they will in almost all cases work
out of the box even on custom LLVM data structures.
I actually find the matcher syntax substantially easier to read even
for simple assertions:
EXPECT_THAT(a, Eq(b));
EXPECT_THAT(b, Ne(c));
Both of these make it clear what is being *tested* and what is being
*expected*. With `EXPECT_EQ` this is implicit (the LHS is expected,
the RHS is tested) and often confusing. With `EXPECT_NE` it is just
not clear. Even the failure error messages are superior with the
matcher based expectations.
2) When testing any kind of generic code, you are continually defining
dummy types with interfaces and then trying to check that the
interfaces are manipulated in a particular way. This is actually what
mocks are *good* for -- testing *interface interactions*. With
generic code, there is often no "fake" or other object that can be
used.
For a concrete example of where this is currently causing significant
pain, look at the pass manager unittests which are riddled with
counters incremented when methods are called. All of these could be
replaced with mocks. The result would be more effective at testing
the code by having tighter constraints. It would be substantially
more readable and maintainable when updating the code. And the error
messages on failure would have substantially more information as
mocks automatically record stack traces and other information *when
the API is misused* instead of trying to diagnose it after the fact.
I expect that #1 will be the overwhelming majority of the uses of gmock,
but I think that is sufficient to justify having it. I would actually
like to update the coding standards to encourage the use of matchers
rather than any other form of `EXPECT_...` macros as they are IMO
a strict superset in terms of functionality and readability.
I think that #2 is relatively rarely useful, but there *are* cases where
it is useful. Historically, I think misuse of actual mocking as
described in #2 has led to resistance towards this framework. I am
actually sympathetic to this -- mocking can easily be overused. However
I think this is not a significant concern in LLVM. First and foremost,
LLVM has very careful and rare exposure of abstract interfaces or
dependency injection, which are the most prone to abuse with mocks. So
there are few opportunities to abuse them. Second, a large fraction of
LLVM's unittests are testing *generic code* where mocks actually make
tremendous sense. And gmock is well suited to building interfaces that
exercise generic libraries. Finally, I still think we should be willing
to have testing utilities in tree even if they should be used rarely. We
can use code review to help guide the usage here.
For a longer and more complete discussion of this, see the llvm-dev
thread here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108672.html
The general consensus seems that this is a reasonable direction to start
down, but that doesn't mean we should race ahead and use this
everywhere. I have one test that is blocked on this to land and that was
specifically used as an example. Before widespread adoption, I'm going
to work up some (brief) guidelines as some of these facilities should be
used sparingly and carefully.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28156
llvm-svn: 291606
Some GCC versions will accept any warning flag name after a '-Wno-',
which would cause us to try to disable warnings with names GCC didn't
understand. This will silently succeed unless there is some other output
from GCC in which case we get weird cc1plus warnings about the warning
name being bogus.
There is still the issue that gtest sets warning flags for building
gtest-all.cc using weird 'add_definitions' and the fact that there is
a GCC version which warns on the variadic macro usage in gtest under
-pedantic, but has no flag analogous to Clang's
-Wgnu-zero-variadic-macro-argumnets to suppress this warning. I haven't
been able to come up with any good solution here. The closest is to turn
off -pedantic for those versions of GCC, but that seems really nasty.
For now, those versinos of GCC aren't warning clean. If anyone is broken
by this, I'll work on CMake logic to detect and disable -pedantic in
these cases.
llvm-svn: 291299
Canonicalize all CMake booleans to 0/1 before passing them to lit, to
ensure that the Python side handles all of them consistently
and correctly. 0/1 is a safe choice of values that trigger the same
boolean interpretation in CMake, Python and C++.
Furthermore, using them without quotes improves the chance Python will
explicitly fail when an incorrect value (such as ON/OFF, TRUE/FALSE,
YES/NO) is accidentally passed, rather than silently misinterpreting
the value.
This replaces a lot of different logics spread around lit site files,
attempting to partially reproduce the boolean logic used in CMake
and usually silently failing when an uncommon value was used instead.
In fact, some of them were never working correctly since different
values were assigned in CMake and checked in Python.
The alternative solution could be to create a common parser for CMake
booleans in lit and use it consistently throughout the site files.
However, it does not seem like the best idea to create redundant
implementation of the same logic and have to follow upstream if it ever
is extended to handle more values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28294
llvm-svn: 291284
Using sigaltstack on Apple platforms is a bad idea. Darwin's backtrace()
function does not work with sigaltstack, and my change in r286851 was
supposed to solve that by using _Unwind_Backtrace instead. I tested that
_Unwind_Backtrace works for crashes but then discovered that it does not
work for assertion failures when using sigaltstack, at least on macOS.
The stack trace shows only the frames on the alternate stack.
I also saw some reports of this happening for crashes, but it fails
consistently for assertion failures. I tried various things to get it to
work but the problem seems to be in _Unwind_Backtrace itself. Disabling
sigaltstack is unfortunate since it would be nice to get backtraces for
stack overflows, but at least this gets us backtraces for the more common
cases. rdar://problem/29662459
llvm-svn: 291206
I somehow wrote this fix and then lost it prior to commit. Really sorry
about the noise. This should fix some issues with hacking add_definition
to do things with warning flags.
llvm-svn: 291033
This required re-working the streaming support and lit's support for
'--gtest_list_tests' but otherwise seems to be a clean upgrade.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28154
llvm-svn: 291029
I'm not sure what determines the minor version, but it appears
that it's possible for a fully updated, release version of
VS2015 with Update 3 can go (at least) as low as 19.00.24213.1.
Updating the compiler version check to account for this so we
don't generate superfluous warnings.
llvm-svn: 290914
Add an explicit LLVM_ENABLE_DIA_SDK option to control building support
for DIA SDK-based debugging. Control its value to match whether DIA SDK
support was found and expose it in LLVMConfig (alike LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB).
Its value is needed for LLDB to determine whether to run tests requiring
DIA support. Currently it is obtained from llvm/Config/config.h;
however, this file is not available for standalone builds. Following
this change, LLDB will be modified to use the value from LLVMConfig.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26255
llvm-svn: 290818
COFF has a 2**16 section limit, and on Win64, every COMDAT function
creates at least 3 sections: .text, .pdata, and .xdata. For MSVC, we
enable bigobj on a file-by-file basis, but GCC appears to hit the limit
on different files.
Fixes PR25953
llvm-svn: 290358
If OUTPUT_DIR is not specified we can assume the symlink is linking to a file in the same directory, so we can use $<TARGET_FILE_NAME:${target}> to create a relative symlink.
In the case of LLDB, when we build a framework, we are creating symlinks in a different directory than the file we're pointing to, and we don't install those links. To make this work in the build directory we can use $<TARGET_FILE:${target}> instead, which uses the full path to the target.
llvm-svn: 289840
This change enables building builtins for multiple different targets
using LLVM runtimes directory.
To specify the builtin targets to be built, use the LLVM_BUILTIN_TARGETS
variable, where the value is the list of targets. To pass a per target
variable to the builtin build, you can set BUILTINS_<target>_<variable>
where <variable> will be passed to the builtin build for <target>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26652
llvm-svn: 289491
It is kinda crazy to have llvm/include and llvm/lib/Target in the include path for every tablegen invocation for every tablegen-like tool.
This patch removes those flags from the tablgen function that is called everywhere by instead creating a variable LLVM_TABLEGEN_FLAGS which is setup in the LLVM source directories.
This removes TableGen.cmake's dependency on LLVM_MAIN_SRC_DIR, and LLVM_MAIN_INCLUDE_DIR.
llvm-svn: 288770
This fix, while a bit complicated, preserves the reusability while fixing the issues reported on llvm-commits with visual studio generators.
llvm-svn: 288679
Include component in install rules for Sphinx targets. Based on
a similar suggestion for other doc targets in D24935.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24982
llvm-svn: 288656
The old implementation of add_llvm_tool_symlink could fail in odd ways when building out of tree. This version solves that problem by not using the LLVM_* variables, and instead reaeding the target's properties.
llvm-svn: 288632
Add an optional parameter to `llvm_install_symlink` which allows the symlink
installation to be placed into a specific component rather than the default
value.
llvm-svn: 288600
This fixes a regression introduced by r285714: we weren't setting the
rpath on LLVMgold.so correctly.
Spotted by mark@chromium.org!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27176
llvm-svn: 288076
When LLVM_DEPENDENCY_DEBUGGING=On we should apply the sandbox only on the target, not the directory. This is important for directories that create more than one target, or for nested directories.
llvm-svn: 287415
Summary: This should provide the function similar to `--disable-libedit` with the autotools build system, which seems to be missing from the commit (r200595) that adds this.
Reviewers: pcc, beanz
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26550
llvm-svn: 287293
Summary:
The motivation for this is to enable correct detection of dlopen() on Android.
Android does not provide a static version of libdl, so if we add the -static flag
after performing the check, it will succeed even though subsequent link steps
will fail. With this change we correctly detect the absence of libdl in a
LLVM_BUILD_STATIC build on Android.
The link itself still does not succeed because the code does not check the result
of this check properly, but I plan to fix that in a separate change.
Reviewers: beanz
Subscribers: danalbert, mgorny, srhines, tberghammer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26463
llvm-svn: 287220
This patch adds an option to the build system LLVM_DEPENDENCY_DEBUGGING. Over time I plan to extend this to do more complex verifications, but the initial patch causes compile errors wherever there is missing a dependency on intrinsics_gen.
Because intrinsics_gen is a compile-time dependency not a link-time dependency, everything that relies on the headers generated in intrinsics_gen needs an explicit dependency.
llvm-svn: 287207
When using LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS, it's possible for LLVM's
export list to be empty. If this happens the install(EXPORTS) command
will fail, but since there isn't anything to install anyway we really
just want to skip it.
llvm-svn: 286209
Summary:
Set _install_rpath to CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH if it is defined, so that eventually
INSTALL_RPATH is set to CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH.
The "if(NOT DEFINED CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH)" was missing a corresponding else
clause.
This also cleans up the fix made in r285908.
Patch by Azharuddin Mohammed
Reviewers: john.brawn, sgundapa, beanz
Subscribers: chapuni, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26289
llvm-svn: 286184
This Makes sure we only export targets that we're distributing, since
cmake will fail to import the file otherwise due to missing targets.
llvm-svn: 286024
r285714 made it so that when CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH is set _install_rpath is not
set, but that means INSTALL_RPATH gets set to an empty string which isn't what
we want. Fix this by setting INSTALL_RPATH only when _install_rpath is set.
llvm-svn: 285908
This patch was produced in conjunction with Michał Górny. It should resolve the issues that were trying to be solved by D25304.
This moves rpath handling into `llvm_add_library` and `add_llvm_executable` so that it is available to all projects using AddLLVM whether built in-tree or out-of-tree.
llvm-svn: 285714
Summary:
This is temporary, until bot that builds public facing LLVM
documentation is upgraded. It reverts only the cmake change in r284497,
but leaves the doc changes in place to preserve intent.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26078
llvm-svn: 285406
Omair Javaid