D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.
This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.
The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.
Recommitted with some fixes for the leftover MCII variables in release
builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506
This reverts commit e2fb8c0f4b as it does
not build for Release builds, and some buildbots are giving more warning
than I saw locally. Reverting to fix those issues.
D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.
This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.
The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506
MIR support is totally unusable for AMDGPU without this, since the set
of reserved registers is set from fields here.
Add a clone method to MachineFunctionInfo. This is a subtle variant of
the copy constructor that is required if there are any MIR constructs
that use pointers. Specifically, at minimum fields that reference
MachineBasicBlocks or the MachineFunction need to be adjusted to the
values in the new function.
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
MCSymbolizer::tryAddingSymbolicOperand() overloaded the Size parameter
to specify either the instruction size or the operand size depending on
the architecture. However, for proper symbolic disassembly on X86, we
need to know both sizes, as an instruction can have two operands, and
the instruction size cannot be reliably calculated based on the operand
offset and its size. Hence, split Size into OpSize and InstSize.
For X86, the new interface allows to fix a couple of issues:
* Correctly adjust the value of PC-relative operands.
* Set operand size to zero when the operand is specified implicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126101
The name `MCFixedLenDisassembler.h` is out of date after D120958.
Rename it as `MCDecoderOps.h` to reflect the change.
Reviewed By: myhsu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124987
All LLVM backends use MCDisassembler as a base class for their
instruction decoders. Use "const MCDisassembler *" for the decoder
instead of "const void *". Remove unnecessary static casts.
Reviewed By: skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122245
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
Add disassembler support for the NORM and NORMH instructions. These instructions
only exist when the ARC processor is configured with the "norm" extension.
fferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107118
This change is a step towards implementing codegen for __builtin_clz().
Full support for CLZ with a regression test will follow shortly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105560
This patch sets the isCommutable attribute for several opcodes that have
the "reg = OPCODE reg, reg" format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103653
When you try to define a new DEBUG_TYPE in a header file, DEBUG_TYPE
definition defined around the #includes in files include it could
result in redefinition warnings even compile errors.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102594
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
This patch allows targets to define multiple cost
values for each register so that the cost model
can be more flexible and better used during the
register allocation as per the target requirements.
For AMDGPU the VGPR allocation will be more efficient
if the register cost can be associated dynamically
based on the calling convention.
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86836
This patch factors out the part of printInstruction that gets the
mnemonic string for a given MCInst. This is intended to be used
subsequently for the instruction-mix remarks to display the final
mnemonic (D90040).
Unfortunately making `getMnemonic` available to the AsmPrinter
seems to require making it virtual. Not sure if there's a way around
that with the current layering of the AsmPrinters.
Reviewed By: Paul-C-Anagnostopoulos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90039
No longer rely on an external tool to build the llvm component layout.
Instead, leverage the existing `add_llvm_componentlibrary` cmake function and
introduce `add_llvm_component_group` to accurately describe component behavior.
These function store extra properties in the created targets. These properties
are processed once all components are defined to resolve library dependencies
and produce the header expected by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90848
Don't do this in the MachineFunctionInfo constructor. Also, ensure the
alignment rather than overwriting it outright. I vaguely remember
there was another place to enforce the target minimum alignment, but I
couldn't find it (it's there for instructions).
David Green