This allows constructing a MemDesc from a MachineMemoryOperand, a pattern that starts to show up more frequently.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109161
This enables proper lowering of non-byte sized loads. We still aren't
faithfully preserving memory types everywhere, so the legality checks
still only consider the size.
Since this method can apply to cmpxchg operations, make sure it's clear
what value we're actually retrieving. This will help ensure we don't
accidentally ignore the failure ordering of cmpxchg in the future.
We could potentially introduce a getOrdering() method on AtomicSDNode
that asserts the operation isn't cmpxchg, but not sure that's
worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103338
It's still in use in a few places so we can't delete it yet but there's not
many at this point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103352
If the target explicitly requested custom legalization, it should be
required to implement this. Also move default legalizeIntrinsic
implementation into the header so it's next to the related
legalizeCustom.
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jfb, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76925
For some operations, the type is unimportant and only the number of
bits matters. For example I don't want to treat <4 x s8> as a legal
type, but I also don't want to decompose loads of this into smaller
pieces to get legal register types.
On AMDGPU in SelectionDAG, we legalize a number of operations (most
notably load and store) by coercing all types to vectors of i32. For
GlobalISel, I'm trying very hard to avoid doing this for every type,
but I don't think this strategy can be completely avoided. I'm trying
to avoid bitcasts for any legitimately legal type we can operate on,
since the intervening bitcasts have proven to be a hassle.
For loads, I think I can get away without ever casting the result
type, and handling any arbitrary bitwidth during selection (I will
eventually want new tablegen support to help with this, rather than
having to add every possible type as legal). The unmerge required to
do anything with the value should expand to the expected shifts. This
is trickier for stores, since it would now require handling a wide
array of truncates during selection which I don't want.
Future potentially interesting case are for vector indexing, where
sub-dword type should be indexed in s32 pieces.
This is passed to legalizeCustom, but not intrinsic. Also remove the
MRI argument, since you can get that from the MachineIRBuilder.
I'm not sure why MachineIRBuilder has a private observer member, and
this is passed separately.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70922
This adds a hook to allow targets to define exactly what extension
operation should be performed for widening constants. This handles cases
like widening i1 true which would end up becoming -1 which affects code
quality during combines.
Additionally, in order to stay consistent with how DAG is promoting
constants, we now signextend for byte sized types and zero extend
otherwise (by default). Targets can of course override this if
necessary.
Doing this makes MSVC complain that `empty(someRange)` could refer to
either C++17's std::empty or LLVM's llvm::empty, which previously we
avoided via SFINAE because std::empty is defined in terms of an empty
member rather than begin and end. So, switch callers over to the new
method as it is added.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68439
llvm-svn: 373935
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31359
Add a hook "legalizeInstrinsic" to allow backends to override this
and custom lower/legalize intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 364821
* LegalizeAction should be printed by name rather than number
* Newly created instructions are incomplete at the point the observer first sees
them. They are therefore recorded in a small vector and printed just before
the legalizer moves on to another instruction. By this point, the instruction
must be complete.
llvm-svn: 359481
Overloaded intrinsics aren't necessarily safe for instruction selection. One
such intrinsic is aarch64.neon.addp.*.
This is a temporary workaround to ensure that we always fall back on that
intrinsic. Eventually this will be replaced with a proper solution.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40968
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59062
llvm-svn: 355865
I've repeatedly encountered bugs resulting from custom legalize
mutations returning nonsense legalize results, such as increasing the
number of elements for FewerElements. Add an assert function to make
sure the type to mutate to is consistent with the legalize action.
llvm-svn: 352636
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54980
This provides a standard API across GISel passes to observe and notify
passes about changes (insertions/deletions/mutations) to MachineInstrs.
This patch also removes the recordInsertion method in MachineIRBuilder
and instead provides method to setObserver.
Reviewed by: vkeles.
llvm-svn: 348406
Now that we have the ability to legalize based on MMO's. Add support for
legalizing based on AtomicOrdering and use it to correct the legalization
of the atomic instructions.
Also extend all() to be a variadic template as this ruleset now requires
3 and 4 argument versions.
llvm-svn: 335767
This commit adds a simple verifier that tracks type indices being
touched by legalization rules' builders.
Every target will now have an opportunity to call
LegalizerInfo::verify(...) at the end of its derived LegalizerInfo's
constructor and check there are no obvious mistakes like checking only
first type for an opcode that has more than one type index and therefore
implicitly declaring any type for the second (and higher) type index
legal.
The check is only ran in assert builds and should have very minor
performance impact in assert builds and none in release builds.
This commit does not add LegalizerInfo::verify(...) calls to
target-specific legalizers, look for separate commits for that.
This commit also doesn't make the verification errors fatal, only
produces an error message, look for a later commit that does.
Reviewers: aemerson, qcolombet
Reviewed By: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46338
llvm-svn: 333576
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Summary:
Currently only the memory size is supported but others can be added as
needed.
narrowScalar for G_LOAD and G_STORE now correctly update the
MachineMemOperand and will refuse to legalize atomics since those need more
careful expansions to maintain atomicity.
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, aemerson, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45466
llvm-svn: 331071
Lower is slightly odd. It often doesn't change the type but the lowerings
do use the new type to decide what code to create. Treat it like a mutation
but provide convenience functions that re-use the existing type.
Re-uses the existing tests:
test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/legalize-rem.mir
test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel//legalize-mul.mir
test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel//legalize-cmpxchg-with-success.mir
llvm-svn: 329623
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, MatzeB, RKSimon
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45133
llvm-svn: 329435
Currently it's impossible to test InstructionSelect pass with MIR which
is considered illegal by the Legalizer in Assert builds. In early stages
of porting an existing backend from SelectionDAG ISel to GlobalISel,
however, we would have very basic CallLowering, Legalizer, and
RegBankSelect implementations, but rather functional Instruction Select
with quite a few patterns selectable due to the semi-automatic porting
process borrowing them from SelectionDAG ISel.
As we are trying to define legality as a property of being selectable by
the instruction selector, it would be nice to be able to easily check
what the selector can do in its current state w/o the legality check
provided by the Legalizer getting in the way.
It also seems beneficial to have a regression testing set up that would
not allow the selector to silently regress in its support of the MIR not
supported yet by the previous passes in the GlobalISel pipeline.
This commit adds -disable-gisel-legality-check command line option to
llc that disables those legality checks in RegBankSelect and
InstructionSelect passes.
It also adds quite a few MIR test cases for AArch64's Instruction
Selector. Every one of them would fail on the legality check at the
moment, but will select just fine if the check is disabled. Every test
MachineFunction is intended to exercise a specific selection rule and
that rule only, encoded in the MachineFunction's name by the rule's
number, ID, and index of its GIM_Try opcode in TableGen'erated
MatchTable (-optimize-match-table=false).
Reviewers: ab, dsanders, qcolombet, rovka
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, volkan, aditya_nandakumar, aemerson,
rengolin, t.p.northover, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42886
llvm-svn: 326396
* Document most API's
* Delete a useless function call
* Fix a discrepancy between the single and multi-opcode variants of
getActionDefinitions().
The multi-opcode variant now requires that more than one opcode is requested.
Previously it acted much like the single-opcode form but unnecessarily
enforced the requirements of the multi-opcode form.
llvm-svn: 325067
Summary:
As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some
operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support
for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions
about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized
before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if
you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually
but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize
type1 first.
Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept
separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of
code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make
illegal MIR more legal.
This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets
have been migrated) which resolves all these issues.
Here are the rules for shift and division:
for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV})
getActionDefinitions(BinOp)
.legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32
// If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64
.widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported
This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to
make illegal things legal.
Here's an example of a complex rule:
getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal
// We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that.
const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1];
if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0)
return false;
return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) &&
(Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8);
})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToPow2(0)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32
.widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported();
This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than
type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one
to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to:
.legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}})
In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when
AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now.
I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization
cost.
Future work:
* Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for
G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's
no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet.
* Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64)
* Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules.
* Improve initialization cost using constexpr
Possible future work:
* It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of
returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little
overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but
the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom.
With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization
change the opcode to something that's considered legal.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251
llvm-svn: 323681
Summary:
The improvements to the LegalizerInfo discussed in D42244 require that
LegalizerInfo::LegalizeAction be available for use in other classes. As such,
it needs to be moved out of LegalizerInfo. This has been done separately to the
next patch to minimize the noise in that patch.
llvm-svn: 323669
Summary:
`getAction(const InstrAspect &) const` breaks encapsulation by exposing
the smaller components that are used to decide how to legalize an
instruction.
This is a problem because we need to change the implementation of
LegalizerInfo so that it's able to describe particular type combinations
rather than just cartesian products of types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES has relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
This patch introduces LegalityQuery which provides all the information
needed by the legalizer to make a decision on whether something is legal
and how to legalize it.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: bogner, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42244
llvm-svn: 323342
Summary: LegalizerInfo assumes all G_MERGE_VALUES and G_UNMERGE_VALUES instructions are legal, so it is not possible to legalize vector operations on illegal vector types. This patch fixes the problem by removing the related check and adding default actions for G_MERGE_VALUES and G_UNMERGE_VALUES.
Reviewers: qcolombet, ab, dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, t.p.northover, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rovka, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39823
llvm-svn: 319524
Matt Arsenault