On MachO, putting a symbol that doesn't start with a 'L' or 'l' in one of the
__TEXT,__literal* sections prevents the linker from merging the context of the
section.
Since private GVs are the ones the get mangled to start with 'L' or 'l', we now
only put those on the __TEXT,__literal* sections.
llvm-svn: 216682
file.
Changing code that is covered by these tests is just too hard to debug
currently, and now it will be clear the nature of the changes.
llvm-svn: 216643
we stopped efficiently lowering sextload using the SSE41 instructions
for that operation.
This is a consequence of a bad predicate I used thinking of the memory
access needs. The code actually handles the cases where the predicate
doesn't apply, and handles them much better. =] Simple fix and a test
case added. Fixes PR20767.
llvm-svn: 216538
This combine is essentially combining target-specific nodes back into target
independent nodes that it "knows" will be combined yet again by a target
independent DAG combine into a different set of target-independent nodes that
are legal (not custom though!) and thus "ok". This seems... deeply flawed. The
crux of the problem is that we don't combine un-legalized shuffles that are
introduced by legalizing other operations, and thus we don't see a very
profitable combine opportunity. So the backend just forces the input to that
combine to re-appear.
However, for this to work, the conditions detected to re-form the unlegalized
nodes must be *exactly* right. Previously, failing this would have caused poor
code (if you're lucky) or a crasher when we failed to select instructions.
After r215611 we would fall back into the legalizer. In some cases, this just
"fixed" the crasher by produces bad code. But in the test case added it caused
the legalizer and the dag combiner to iterate forever.
The fix is to make the alignment checking in the x86 side of things match the
alignment checking in the generic DAG combine exactly. This isn't really a
satisfying or principled fix, but it at least make the code work as intended.
It also highlights that it would be nice to detect the availability of under
aligned loads for a given type rather than bailing on this optimization. I've
left a FIXME to document this.
Original commit message for r215611 which covers the rest of the chang:
[SDAG] Fix a case where we would iteratively legalize a node during
combining by replacing it with something else but not re-process the
node afterward to remove it.
In a truly remarkable stroke of bad luck, this would (in the test case
attached) end up getting some other node combined into it without ever
getting re-processed. By adding it back on to the worklist, in addition
to deleting the dead nodes more quickly we also ensure that if it
*stops* being dead for any reason it makes it back through the
legalizer. Without this, the test case will end up failing during
instruction selection due to an and node with a type we don't have an
instruction pattern for.
It took many million runs of the shuffle fuzz tester to find this.
llvm-svn: 216537
these DAG combines.
The DAG auto-CSE thing is truly terrible. Due to it, when RAUW-ing
a node with its operand, you can cause its uses to CSE to itself, which
then causes their uses to become your uses which causes them to be
picked up by the RAUW. For nodes that are determined to be "no-ops",
this is "fine". But if the RAUW is one of several steps to enact
a transformation, this causes the DAG to really silently eat an discard
nodes that you would never expect. It took days for me to actually
pinpoint a test case triggering this and a really frustrating amount of
time to even comprehend the bug because I never even thought about the
ability of RAUW to iteratively consume nodes due to CSE-ing them into
itself.
To fix this, we have to build up a brand-new chain of operations any
time we are combining across (potentially) intervening nodes. But once
the logic is added to do this, another issue surfaces: CombineTo eagerly
deletes the one node combined, *but no others*. This is... really
frustrating. If deleting it makes its operands become dead, those
operand nodes often won't go onto the worklist in the
order you would want -- they're already on it and not near the top. That
means things higher on the worklist will get combined prior to these
dead nodes being GCed out of the worklist, and if the chain is long, the
immediate users won't be enough to re-detect where the root of the chain
is that became single-use again after deleting the dead nodes. The
better way to do this is to never immediately delete nodes, and instead
to just enqueue them so we can recursively delete them. The
combined-from node is typically not on the worklist anyways by virtue of
having been popped off.... But that in turn breaks other tests that
*require* CombineTo to delete unused nodes. :: sigh ::
Fortunately, there is a better way. This whole routine should have been
returning the replacement rather than using CombineTo which is quite
hacky. Switch to that, and all the pieces fall together.
I suspect the same kind of miscompile is possible in the half-shuffle
folding code, and potentially the recursive folding code. I'll be
switching those over to a pattern more like this one for safety's sake
even though I don't immediately have any test cases for them. Note that
the only way I got a test case for this instance was with *heavily* DAG
combined 256-bit shuffle sequences generated by my fuzzer. ;]
llvm-svn: 216319
There's no need to do this if the user doesn't call va_start. In the
future, we're going to have thunks that forward these register
parameters with musttail calls, and they won't need these spills for
handling va_start.
Most of the test suite changes are adding va_start calls to existing
tests to keep things working.
llvm-svn: 216294
Fix for PR20648 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20648
This patch checks the operands of a vselect to see if all values are constants.
If yes, bail out of any further attempts to create a blend or shuffle because
SelectionDAGLegalize knows how to turn this kind of vselect into a single load.
This already happens for machines without SSE4.1, so the added checks just send
more targets down that path.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4934
llvm-svn: 216121
The goal of the patch is to implement section 3.2.3 of the AMD64 ABI
correctly. The controlling sentence is, "The size of each argument gets
rounded up to eightbytes. Therefore the stack will always be eightbyte
aligned." The equivalent sentence in the i386 ABI page 37 says, "At all
times, the stack pointer should point to a word-aligned area." For both
architectures, the stack pointer is not being rounded up to the nearest
eightbyte or word between the last normal argument and the first
variadic argument.
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
llvm-svn: 216119
Summary: This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19530.
The problem is that X86ISelLowering erroneously thought the third call
was eligible for tail call elimination.
It would have been if it's return value was actually the one returned
by the calling function, but here that is not the case and
additional values are being returned.
Test Plan: Test case from the original bug report is included.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4968
llvm-svn: 216117
In PR20308 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20308 ), the critical-anti-dependency breaker
caused a miscompile because it broke a WAR hazard using a register that it thinks is available
based on info from a kill inst. Until PR18663 is solved, we shouldn't use any def/use info from
a kill because they are really just nops.
This patch adds guard checks for kills around calls to ScanInstruction() where the DefIndices
array is set. For good measure, add an assert in ScanInstruction() so we don't hit this bug again.
The test case is a reduced version of the code from the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4977
llvm-svn: 216114
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20016 reproducible on new
lea-5.ll case.
Also use RSP/RBP for x32 lea to save 1 byte used for 0x67 prefix in
ESP/EBP case.
Test Plan: lea tests modified to include x32/nacl and new test added
Reviewers: nadav, dschuff, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, zinovy.nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4929
llvm-svn: 216065
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.
Original commit message:
In the large code model for X86 floating-point constants are placed in the
constant pool and materialized by loading from it. Since the constant pool
could be far away, a PC relative load might not work. Therefore we first
materialize the address of the constant pool with a movabsq and then load
from there the floating-point value.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17674628>.
llvm-svn: 216012
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.
Original commit message:
This mostly affects the i64 value type, which always resulted in an 15byte
mobavsq instruction to materialize any constant. The custom code checks the
value of the immediate and tries to use a different and smaller mov
instruction when possible.
This fixes <rdar://problem/17420988>.
llvm-svn: 216010
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. This commit
exposed a latent bug that was fixed in r215753. Therefore it is reapplied
without any modifications.
I run it through SPEC2k and SPEC2k6 for AArch64 and it didn't introduce any new
regeressions.
Original commit message:
This changes the order in which FastISel tries to materialize a constant.
Originally it would try to use a simple target-independent approach, which
can lead to the generation of inefficient code.
On X86 this would result in the use of movabsq to materialize any 64bit
integer constant - even for simple and small values such as 0 and 1. Also
some very funny floating-point materialization could be observed too.
On AArch64 it would materialize the constant 0 in a register even the
architecture has an actual "zero" register.
On ARM it would generate unnecessary mov instructions or not use mvn.
This change simply changes the order and always asks the target first if it
likes to materialize the constant. This doesn't fix all the issues
mentioned above, but it enables the targets to implement such
optimizations.
Related to <rdar://problem/17420988>.
llvm-svn: 216006
When combining a pair of shuffle nodes, check if the combined shuffle mask is
trivially Undef. In case, immediately fold that pair of shuffles to Undef.
The lack of checks for undef masks was the root-cause of a poor-codegen bug
in the dag combiner.
Example:
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> %B, <4 x i32> <i32 4, i32 1, i32 1, i32 6>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 6>
%3 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %2, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 5, i32 3, i32 3>
Before this patch, on x86 (with -mcpu=corei7) we failed to fold the entire
sequence to Undef value and therefore we generated:
shufps $-123, %xmm1, $xmm0
pshufd $-46, %xmm0, %xmm0
With this patch, the entire shuffle sequence is folded to Undef and no
shuffles are generated in the output assembly.
Added new test cases to test 'combine-vec-shuffle-5.ll'.
llvm-svn: 215797
the new shuffle lowering and an implementation for v4 shuffles.
This allows us to handle non-half-crossing shuffles directly for v4
shuffles, both integer and floating point. This currently misses places
where we could perform the blend via UNPCK instructions, but otherwise
generates equally good or better code for the test cases included to the
existing vector shuffle lowering. There are a few cases that are
entertainingly better. ;]
llvm-svn: 215702
target-specific shuffl DAG combines.
We were recognizing the paired shuffles backwards. This code needs to be
replaced anyways as we have the same functionality elsewhere, but I'll
do the refactoring in a follow-up, this is the minimal fix to the
behavior.
In addition to fixing miscompiles with the new vector shuffle lowering,
it also causes the canonicalization to kick in much better, selecting
the smaller encoding variants in lots of places in the new AVX path.
This still isn't quite ideal as we don't need both the shufpd and the
punpck instructions, but that'll get fixed in a follow-up patch.
llvm-svn: 215690
broken logic for merging shuffle masks in the face of SM_SentinelZero
mask operands.
While these are '-1' they don't mean 'undef' the way '-1' means in the
pre-legalized shuffle masks. Instead, they mean that the shuffle
operation is forcibly zeroing that lane. Reflect this and explicitly
handle it in a bunch of places. In one place the effect is equivalent
but much more clear. In the rest it was really weirdly broken.
Also, rewrite the entire merging thing to be a more directy operation
with a single loop and just doing math to map the indices through the
various masks.
Also add a bunch of asserts to try to make in extremely clear what the
different masks can possibly look like.
Finally, add some comments to clarify that we're merging shuffle masks
*up* here rather than *down* as we do everywhere else, and thus the
logic is quite confusing.
Thanks to several different people for sending test cases, and for
Robert Khasanov for an initial attempt at fixing.
llvm-svn: 215687
This reverts:
r215595 "[FastISel][X86] Add large code model support for materializing floating-point constants."
r215594 "[FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value."
r215593 "[FastISel][X86] Emit more efficient instructions for integer constant materialization."
r215591 "[FastISel][AArch64] Make use of the zero register when possible."
r215588 "[FastISel] Let the target decide first if it wants to materialize a constant."
r215582 "[FastISel][AArch64] Cleanup constant materialization code. NFCI."
llvm-svn: 215673
This patch allows a vector fneg of a bitcasted integer value to be optimized in the same way that we already optimize a scalar fneg. If the integer variable is a constant, we can precompute the result and not require any logic ops.
This patch is very similar to a fabs patch committed at r214892.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4852
llvm-svn: 215646
lowering scheme.
Currently, this just directly bails to the fallback path of splitting
the 256-bit vector into two 128-bit vectors, operating there, and then
joining the results back together. While the results are far from
perfect, they are *shockingly* good for what we're doing here. I'll be
layering the rest of the functionality on top of this piece by piece and
updating tests as I go.
Note that 256-bit vectors in this mode are still somewhat WIP. While
I think the code paths that I'm adding here are clean and good-to-go,
there are still a lot of 128-bit assumptions that I'll need to stomp out
as I march through the functional spread here.
llvm-svn: 215637
input node after manually adding it to the worklist and using CombineTo.
Once we use CombineTo the input node may have been deleted. Despite this
being *completely confusing* and somewhat broken, the only way to
"correctly" return from a DAG combine after potentially deleting the
input node is to return *that exact node*....
But really, this code should just never have used CombineTo. It won't do
what it wants (returning the node as mentioned above just causes the
combine to infloop). The correct way to combine away a casted load to
a load of the correct type is to RAUW the chain directly and then return
the loaded value to replace the actual value node.
I managed to find this with the vector shuffle fuzzer even though it
clearly has nothing at all to do with vector shuffles and rather those
happen to trigger a load of a constant pool that hits this combine *just
right*. I've included the test as it is small and a nice stress test
that the infrastructure isn't asserting.
llvm-svn: 215622
combining by replacing it with something else but not re-process the
node afterward to remove it.
In a truly remarkable stroke of bad luck, this would (in the test case
attached) end up getting some other node combined into it without ever
getting re-processed. By adding it back on to the worklist, in addition
to deleting the dead nodes more quickly we also ensure that if it
*stops* being dead for any reason it makes it back through the
legalizer. Without this, the test case will end up failing during
instruction selection due to an and node with a type we don't have an
instruction pattern for.
It took many million runs of the shuffle fuzz tester to find this.
llvm-svn: 215611
In the large code model for X86 floating-point constants are placed in the
constant pool and materialized by loading from it. Since the constant pool
could be far away, a PC relative load might not work. Therefore we first
materialize the address of the constant pool with a movabsq and then load
from there the floating-point value.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17674628>.
llvm-svn: 215595
This mostly affects the i64 value type, which always resulted in an 15byte
mobavsq instruction to materialize any constant. The custom code checks the
value of the immediate and tries to use a different and smaller mov
instruction when possible.
This fixes <rdar://problem/17420988>.
llvm-svn: 215593
This changes the order in which FastISel tries to materialize a constant.
Originally it would try to use a simple target-independent approach, which
can lead to the generation of inefficient code.
On X86 this would result in the use of movabsq to materialize any 64bit
integer constant - even for simple and small values such as 0 and 1. Also
some very funny floating-point materialization could be observed too.
On AArch64 it would materialize the constant 0 in a register even the
architecture has an actual "zero" register.
On ARM it would generate unnecessary mov instructions or not use mvn.
This change simply changes the order and always asks the target first if it
likes to materialize the constant. This doesn't fix all the issues
mentioned above, but it enables the targets to implement such
optimizations.
Related to <rdar://problem/17420988>.
llvm-svn: 215588
This patch improves the existing algorithm in DAGCombiner that
attempts to fold shuffles according to rule:
shuffle(shuffle(x, y, M1), undef, M2) -> shuffle(y, undef, M3)
Before this change, there were cases where the DAGCombiner conservatively
avoided folding shuffles even if the resulting mask would have been legal.
That is because the algorithm wrongly assumed that commuting
an illegal shuffle mask would always produce an illegal mask.
With this change, we now correctly compute the commuted shuffle mask before
calling method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' on it.
On X86, this improves for example the codegen for the following function:
define <4 x i32> @test(<4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> %B) {
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %B, <4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 6, i32 7>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 2, i32 3>
ret <4 x i32> %2
}
Before this change the X86 backend (-mcpu=corei7) generated
the following assembly code for function @test:
shufps $-23, %xmm0, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[1,2],xmm0[2,3]
movhlps %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[1,1]
movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
Now we produce:
movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[1,1]
Added extra test cases in combine-vec-shuffle-2.ll to verify that we correctly
fold according to the above-mentioned rule.
llvm-svn: 215555
Added avx512_movnt_vl multiclass for handling 256/128-bit forms of instruction.
Added encoding and lowering tests.
Reviewed by Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 215536
one pesky test case correctly.
This test case caused the old code to infloop occilating between solving
the low-half and the high-half. The 'side balancing' part of
single-input v8 shuffle lowering didn't handle the one pattern which can
cause it to occilate. Fortunately the fuzz testing found this case.
Unfortuately it was *terrible* to handle. I'm really sorry for the
amount and density of the code here, I'd love suggestions on how to
simplify it. I feel like there *must* be a simpler form here, but after
a lot of days I've not found it. This is the only one I've found that
even works. I've added the one pesky test case along with some nice
comments explaining the core problem that we have to solve here.
So far this has survived approximately 32k test cases. More strenuous
fuzzing commencing.
llvm-svn: 215519
I think that this will scale better in most cases than adding a Pat<> for each
mapping from the intrinsic DAG to the intruction (i.e. rri, rrik, rrikz). We
can just lower to the SDNode and have the resulting DAG be matches by the DAG
patterns.
Alternatively (long term), we could keep the Pat<>s but generate them via the
new AVX512_masking multiclass. The difficulty is that in order to formulate
that we would have to concatenate DAGs. Currently this is only supported if
the operators of the input DAGs are identical.
llvm-svn: 215473
Robert Khasanov