CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
In each 128-lane, if there is at least one index is demanded and not all
indices are demanded and this 128-lane is not the first 128-lane of the
legalized-vector, then this 128-lane needs a extracti128;
If in each 128-lane, there is at least one index is demanded, this 128-lane
needs a inserti128.
The following cases will help you build a better understanding:
Assume we insert several elements into a v8i32 vector in avx2,
Case#1: inserting into 1th index needs vpinsrd + inserti128
Case#2: inserting into 5th index needs extracti128 + vpinsrd +
inserti128
Case#3: inserting into 4,5,6,7 index needs 4*vpinsrd + inserti128.
Reviewed By: pengfei, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89767
Using an Identifier is much more efficient for attribute lookups because it uses pointer comparison as opposed to string comparison.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89660
This revisions implements sharding in the storage of parametric instances to decrease lock contention by sharding out the allocator/mutex/etc. to use for a specific storage instance based on the hash key. This is a somewhat common approach to reducing lock contention on data structures, and is used by the concurrent hashmaps provided by folly/java/etc. For several compilations tested, this removed all/most lock contention from profiles and reduced compile time by several seconds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89659
The implementation of target nowait just wraps the target region into a task. The essential four parameters (base ptr, ptr, size, mapper) are taken as firstprivate such that they will be copied to the private location. When there is no user-defined mapper, the mapper variable will be nullptr. However, it will be still copied to the corresponding place. Therefore, a memcpy will be generated and the source pointer will be nullptr, causing a segmentation fault. The root cause is when calling `emitOffloadingArraysArgument`, the last argument `Options` has a field about whether it requires a task. It only takes depend clause into account. In this patch, the nowait clause is also included.
There're two things that will be done in another patches:
1. target data nowait has not been supported yet. D90099 added the support.
2. When there is no mapper, the mapper array can be nullptr no matter whether it requires outer task or not. It can avoid an unnecessary data copy. This is an optimization that is covered in D90101.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89844
Summary:
Makes linking the sanitizers follow the same logic as the rest of the
driver with respect to the static linking strategy for the C++ standard
library.
Subscribers: mcrosier, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80488
Exec mask manipulation inserted by SIWholeQuadMode barriers to
instruction scheduling. Move the entire pass after the machine
instruction scheduler and make changes so pass is correct for
non-SSA operation. These changes should leave the pass still
usable pre-scheduler, although tests have be updated to reflect
post-scheduler results.
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88081
`-separate-const-offset-from-gep` has not yet be ported, so some tests are not updated.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90149
This class represents a rewrite pattern list that has been frozen, and thus immutable. This replaces the uses of OwningRewritePatternList in pattern driver related API, such as dialect conversion. When PDL becomes more prevalent, this API will allow for optimizing a set of patterns once without the need to do this per run of a pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89104
There are several pieces of pattern rewriting infra in IR/ that really shouldn't be there. This revision moves those pieces to a better location such that they are easier to evolve in the future(e.g. with PDL). More concretely this revision does the following:
* Create a Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h and move the apply*andFold methods there.
The definitions for these methods are already in Transforms/ so it doesn't make sense for the declarations to be in IR.
* Create a new lib/Rewrite library and move PatternApplicator there.
This new library will be focused on applying rewrites, and will also include compiling rewrites with PDL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89103
The Pattern class was originally intended to be used for solely matching operations, but that use never materialized. All of the pattern infrastructure uses RewritePattern, and the infrastructure for pure matching(Matchers.h) is implemented inline. This means that this class isn't a useful abstraction at the moment, so this revision refactors it to solely encapsulate the "metadata" of a pattern. The metadata includes the various state describing a pattern; benefit, root operation, etc. The API on PatternApplicator is updated to now operate on `Pattern`s as nothing special from `RewritePattern` is necessary.
This refactoring is also necessary for the upcoming use of PDL patterns alongside C++ rewrite patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86258
The conversion between PDL and the interpreter is split into several different parts.
** The Matcher:
The matching section of all incoming pdl.pattern operations is converted into a predicate tree and merged. Each pattern is first converted into an ordered list of predicates starting from the root operation. A predicate is composed of three distinct parts:
* Position
- A position refers to a specific location on the input DAG, i.e. an
existing MLIR entity being matched. These can be attributes, operands,
operations, results, and types. Each position also defines a relation to
its parent. For example, the operand `[0] -> 1` has a parent operation
position `[0]` (the root).
* Question
- A question refers to a query on a specific positional value. For
example, an operation name question checks the name of an operation
position.
* Answer
- An answer is the expected result of a question. For example, when
matching an operation with the name "foo.op". The question would be an
operation name question, with an expected answer of "foo.op".
After the predicate lists have been created and ordered(based on occurrence of common predicates and other factors), they are formed into a tree of nodes that represent the branching flow of a pattern match. This structure allows for efficient construction and merging of the input patterns. There are currently only 4 simple nodes in the tree:
* ExitNode: Represents the termination of a match
* SuccessNode: Represents a successful match of a specific pattern
* BoolNode/SwitchNode: Branch to a specific child node based on the expected answer to a predicate question.
Once the matcher tree has been generated, this tree is walked to generate the corresponding interpreter operations.
** The Rewriter:
The rewriter portion of a pattern is generated in a very straightforward manor, similarly to lowerings in other dialects. Each PDL operation that may exist within a rewrite has a mapping into the interpreter dialect. The code for the rewriter is generated within a FuncOp, that is invoked by the interpreter on a successful pattern match. Referenced values defined in the matcher become inputs the generated rewriter function.
An example lowering is shown below:
```mlir
// The following high level PDL pattern:
pdl.pattern : benefit(1) {
%resultType = pdl.type
%inputOperand = pdl.input
%root, %results = pdl.operation "foo.op"(%inputOperand) -> %resultType
pdl.rewrite %root {
pdl.replace %root with (%inputOperand)
}
}
// is lowered to the following:
module {
// The matcher function takes the root operation as an input.
func @matcher(%arg0: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.check_operation_name of %arg0 is "foo.op" -> ^bb2, ^bb1
^bb1:
pdl_interp.return
^bb2:
pdl_interp.check_operand_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb3, ^bb1
^bb3:
pdl_interp.check_result_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb4, ^bb1
^bb4:
%0 = pdl_interp.get_operand 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %0 : !pdl.value -> ^bb5, ^bb1
^bb5:
%1 = pdl_interp.get_result 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %1 : !pdl.value -> ^bb6, ^bb1
^bb6:
// This operation corresponds to a successful pattern match.
pdl_interp.record_match @rewriters::@rewriter(%0, %arg0 : !pdl.value, !pdl.operation) : benefit(1), loc([%arg0]), root("foo.op") -> ^bb1
}
module @rewriters {
// The inputs to the rewriter from the matcher are passed as arguments.
func @rewriter(%arg0: !pdl.value, %arg1: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.replace %arg1 with(%arg0)
pdl_interp.return
}
}
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84580
Instead of putting a fake `SLocEntry` at `LoadedSLocEntryTable[Index]`
when it fails to load in `SourceManager::loadSLocEntry`, allocate a fake
one. Unless someone is sniffing the address of the returned `SLocEntry`
(doubtful), this won't be a functionality change. Note that
`SLocEntryLoaded[Index]` wasn't being set to `true` either before or
after this change so no accessor is every going to look at
`LoadedSLocEntryTable[Index]`.
As a side effect, drop the `mutable` from `LoadedSLocEntryTable`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89748
This patch implements the set boolean condition instructions introduced in
POWER10.
The set boolean condition instructions (set[n]bc[r]) are used during
the following situations:
- sign/zero/any extending i1 to an i32 or i64,
- reg+reg, reg+imm or floating point comparisons being sign/zero extended to i32 or i64,
- spilling CR bits (using the setnbc instruction)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87705
The support of a few debug info attributes specifically for Fortran
arrays have been added to LLVM recently, but there's no way to take
advantage of them through DIBuilder. This patch extends
DIBuilder::createArrayType to enable the settings of those attributes.
Patch by Chih-Ping Chen!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89817
Adds support for
- Dropping unit dimension loops for indexed_generic ops.
- Folding consecutive folding (or expanding) reshapes when the result
(or src) is a scalar.
- Fixes to indexed_generic -> generic fusion when zero-dim tensors are
involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90118
Sometimes in unoptimized code, we have dangling unreachable basic blocks with no predecessors. Basic block sections should be emitted for those as well. Without this patch, the included test fails with a fatal error in `AsmPrinter::emitBasicBlockEnd`.
Reviewed By: tmsriram
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89423
Allow overriding the default set of flags used to enable UBSan when
building llvm.
This can be used to test new checks or opt out of certain checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89439
Change `ConstantDataSequential::Next` to a
`unique_ptr<ConstantDataSequential>` and update `CDSConstants` to a
`StringMap<unique_ptr<ConstantDataSequential>>`, making the ownership
more obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90083
Substitues `Type` by `Attribute` in the declaration of AttributeInterface. It
looks like the code was written by copy-pasting the definition of TypeInterface,
but the substitution of Type by Attribute was missing at some places.
Reviewed By: rriddle, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90138
We used to only emit static const data members in CodeView as
S_CONSTANTS when they were used; this patch makes it so they are always emitted.
I changed CodeViewDebug.cpp to find the static const members from the
class debug info instead of creating DIGlobalVariables in the IR
whenever a static const data member is used.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47580
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89072
The alignment attribute in the 'alloca' op treats the '0' value as 'unset'.
When parsing the custom form of the 'alloca' op, ignore the alignment attribute
with if its value is '0' instead of actually creating it and producing a
slightly different textually yet equivalent semantically form in the output.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90179
The support is disabled by default. So far there is instruction
selection, spilling, and frame elimination. It also changes SP
from unswizzled to swizzled as used by flat scratch instructions,
so it cannot be mixed with MUBUF stack access.
At the very least missing:
- GlobalISel;
- Some optimizations in frame elimination in between vector
and scalar ALU;
- It shall finally allow to always materialize frame index
as an SGPR, but that is not implemented and frame elimination
cannot handle it yet;
- Unaligned and/or multidword flat scratch shall work, but it
is legalized now for MUBUF;
- Operand folding cannot optimize FI like with MUBUF yet;
- It will need scaling the value of the SP/FP in the DWARF
expression to recover the unswizzled scratch address;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89170
Prepend the module name hash with a fixed string ".__uniq." which helps tools
that consume sampled profiles and attribute it to functions to understand
that this symbol belongs to a unique internal linkage type symbol.
Symbols with suffixes can result from various optimizations in the compiler.
Function Multiversioning, function splitting, parameter constant propogation,
unique internal linkage names.
External tools like sampled profile aggregators combine profiles from multiple
runs of a binary. They use various heuristics with symbols that have suffixes
to try and attribute the profile to the right function instance. For instance
multi-versioned symbols like foo.avx, foo.sse4.2, etc even though different
should be attributed to the same source function if a single function is
versioned, using attribute target_clones (supported in GCC but yet to land in
LLVM). Similarly, functions that are split (split part having a .cold suffix)
could have profiles for both the original and split symbols but would be
aggregated and attributed to the original function that was split.
Unique internal linkage functions however have different source instances and
the aggregator must not put them together but attribute it to the appropriate
function instance. To be sure that we are dealing with a symbol of a unique
internal linkage function, we would like to prepend the hash with a known
string ".__uniq." which these tools can check to understand the suffix type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89617
clang supports option -fsplit-machine-functions and this test checks if the
backtraces are sane when functions are split.
With -fsplit-machine-functions, a function with profiles can get split into 2
parts, the original function containing hot code and a cold part as determined
by the profile info and the cold cutoff threshold.. The cold part gets the
".cold" suffix to disambiguate its symbol from the hot part and can be placed
arbitrarily in the address space.
This test checks if the back-trace looks correct when the cold part is executed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90081
Arthur Eubanks