Summary: By using reg_nodbg_empty() to determine if a function can be
treated as a leaf function or not, we miss the case when the register
pair L0_L1 is used but not L0 by itself. This has the effect that
use_all_i32_regs(), a test in reserved-regs.ll which tries to use all
registers, gets treated as a leaf function.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: davide, RKSimon, sepavloff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27089
llvm-svn: 297285
Lay out trellis-shaped CFGs optimally.
A trellis of the shape below:
A B
|\ /|
| \ / |
| X |
| / \ |
|/ \|
C D
would be laid out A; B->C ; D by the current layout algorithm. Now we identify
trellises and lay them out either A->C; B->D or A->D; B->C. This scales with an
increasing number of predecessors. A trellis is a a group of 2 or more
predecessor blocks that all have the same successors.
because of this we can tail duplicate to extend existing trellises.
As an example consider the following CFG:
B D F H
/ \ / \ / \ / \
A---C---E---G---Ret
Where A,C,E,G are all small (Currently 2 instructions).
The CFG preserving layout is then A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,Ret.
The current code will copy C into B, E into D and G into F and yield the layout
A,C,B(C),E,D(E),F(G),G,H,ret
define void @straight_test(i32 %tag) {
entry:
br label %test1
test1: ; A
%tagbit1 = and i32 %tag, 1
%tagbit1eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit1, 0
br i1 %tagbit1eq0, label %test2, label %optional1
optional1: ; B
call void @a()
br label %test2
test2: ; C
%tagbit2 = and i32 %tag, 2
%tagbit2eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit2, 0
br i1 %tagbit2eq0, label %test3, label %optional2
optional2: ; D
call void @b()
br label %test3
test3: ; E
%tagbit3 = and i32 %tag, 4
%tagbit3eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit3, 0
br i1 %tagbit3eq0, label %test4, label %optional3
optional3: ; F
call void @c()
br label %test4
test4: ; G
%tagbit4 = and i32 %tag, 8
%tagbit4eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit4, 0
br i1 %tagbit4eq0, label %exit, label %optional4
optional4: ; H
call void @d()
br label %exit
exit:
ret void
}
here is the layout after D27742:
straight_test: # @straight_test
; ... Prologue elided
; BB#0: # %entry ; A (merged with test1)
; ... More prologue elided
mr 30, 3
andi. 3, 30, 1
bc 12, 1, .LBB0_2
; BB#1: # %test2 ; C
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
beq 0, .LBB0_3
b .LBB0_4
.LBB0_2: # %optional1 ; B (copy of C)
bl a
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
bne 0, .LBB0_4
.LBB0_3: # %test3 ; E
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
beq 0, .LBB0_5
b .LBB0_6
.LBB0_4: # %optional2 ; D (copy of E)
bl b
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
bne 0, .LBB0_6
.LBB0_5: # %test4 ; G
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
b .LBB0_7
.LBB0_6: # %optional3 ; F (copy of G)
bl c
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
.LBB0_7: # %optional4 ; H
bl d
nop
.LBB0_8: # %exit ; Ret
ld 30, 96(1) # 8-byte Folded Reload
addi 1, 1, 112
ld 0, 16(1)
mtlr 0
blr
The tail-duplication has produced some benefit, but it has also produced a
trellis which is not laid out optimally. With this patch, we improve the layouts
of such trellises, and decrease the cost calculation for tail-duplication
accordingly.
This patch produces the layout A,C,E,G,B,D,F,H,Ret. This layout does have
back edges, which is a negative, but it has a bigger compensating
positive, which is that it handles the case where there are long strings
of skipped blocks much better than the original layout. Both layouts
handle runs of executed blocks equally well. Branch prediction also
improves if there is any correlation between subsequent optional blocks.
Here is the resulting concrete layout:
straight_test: # @straight_test
; BB#0: # %entry ; A (merged with test1)
mr 30, 3
andi. 3, 30, 1
bc 12, 1, .LBB0_4
; BB#1: # %test2 ; C
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
bne 0, .LBB0_5
.LBB0_2: # %test3 ; E
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
bne 0, .LBB0_6
.LBB0_3: # %test4 ; G
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
bne 0, .LBB0_7
b .LBB0_8
.LBB0_4: # %optional1 ; B (Copy of C)
bl a
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
beq 0, .LBB0_2
.LBB0_5: # %optional2 ; D (Copy of E)
bl b
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
beq 0, .LBB0_3
.LBB0_6: # %optional3 ; F (Copy of G)
bl c
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
.LBB0_7: # %optional4 ; H
bl d
nop
.LBB0_8: # %exit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28522
llvm-svn: 295223
Summary:
llc would hit a fatal error for errors in inline assembly. The
diagnostics message is now printed.
Reviewers: rengolin, MatzeB, javed.absar, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29408
llvm-svn: 293999
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well, subject to some simple frequency calculations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28583
llvm-svn: 293716
reserved physreg in RegisterCoalescer.
Previously, we only checked for clobbers when merging into a READ of
the physreg, but not when merging from a WRITE to the physreg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28527
llvm-svn: 291942
This reverts commit ada6595a526d71df04988eb0a4b4fe84df398ded.
This needs a simple probability check because there are some cases where it is
not profitable.
llvm-svn: 291695
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27742
llvm-svn: 291609
addSchedBarrierDeps() is supposed to add use operands to the ExitSU
node. The current implementation adds uses for calls/barrier instruction
and the MBB live-outs in all other cases. The use
operands of conditional jump instructions were missed.
Also added code to macrofusion to set the latencies between nodes to
zero to avoid problems with the fusing nodes lingering around in the
pending list now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25140
llvm-svn: 286544
Note: Test is per differential review, but the other changed code in the review was for an optimisation that din't quite work. Nevertheless, the test is valid for the unoptimised version of the fix.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24658
llvm-svn: 285692
On SparcV8, it was previously the case that a variable-sized alloca
might overlap by 4-bytes the last fixed stack variable, effectively
because 92 (the number of bytes reserved for the register spill area) !=
96 (the offset added to SP for where to start a DYNAMIC_STACKALLOC).
It's not as simple as changing 96 to 92, because variables that should
be 8-byte aligned would then be misaligned.
For now, simply increase the allocation size by 8 bytes for each dynamic
allocation -- wastes space, but at least doesn't overlap. As the large
comment says, doing this more efficiently will require larger changes in
llvm.
Also adds some test cases showing that we continue to not support
dynamic stack allocation and over-alignment in the same function.
llvm-svn: 285131
Summary: Both computeKnownBits and ComputeNumSignBits can now do a simple
look-through of EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT. It will compute the result based
on the known bits (or known sign bits) for the vector that the element
is extracted from.
Reviewers: bogner, tstellarAMD, mkuper
Subscribers: wdng, RKSimon, jyknight, llvm-commits, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25007
llvm-svn: 283347
...and the two followup commits:
Revert "[Sparc][Leon] Missed resetting option flags from check-in 278489."
Revert "[Sparc][Leon] Errata fixes for various errata in different
versions of the Leon variants of the Sparc 32 bit processor."
This reverts commit r274856, r278489, and r278492.
llvm-svn: 278511
The nature of the errata are listed in the comments preceding the errata fix passes. Relevant unit tests are implemented for each of these.
These changes update older versions of these errata fixes with improvements to code and unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21960
llvm-svn: 278489
An identity COPY like this:
%AL = COPY %AL, %EAX<imp-def>
has no semantic effect, but encodes liveness information: Further users
of %EAX only depend on this instruction even though it does not define
the full register.
Replace the COPY with a KILL instruction in those cases to maintain this
liveness information. (This reverts a small part of r238588 but this
time adds a comment explaining why a KILL instruction is useful).
llvm-svn: 274952
Errata fixes for various errata in different versions of the Leon variants of the Sparc 32 bit processor.
The nature of the errata are listed in the comments preceding the errata fix passes. Relevant unit tests are implemented for each of these.
Note: Running clang-format has changed a few other lines too, unrelated to the implemented errata fixes. These have been left in as this keeps the code formatting consistent.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21960
llvm-svn: 274856
Tail merge was making the assumption that a layout successor or
predecessor was always a cfg successor/predecessor. Remove that
assumption. Changes to tests are necessary because the errant cfg edges
were preventing optimizations.
llvm-svn: 273700
Passes to fix three hardware errata that appear on some LEON processor variants.
The instructions FSMULD, FMULS and FDIVS do not work as expected on some LEON processors. This change allows those instructions to be substituted for alternatives instruction sequences that are known to work.
These passes only run when selected individually, or as part of a processor defintion. They are not included in general SPARC processor compilations for non-LEON processors or for those LEON processors that do not have these hardware errata.
llvm-svn: 273108
Many CPUs only have the ability to do a 4-byte cmpxchg (or ll/sc), not 1
or 2-byte. For those, you need to mask and shift the 1 or 2 byte values
appropriately to use the 4-byte instruction.
This change adds support for cmpxchg-based instruction sets (only SPARC,
in LLVM). The support can be extended for LL/SC-based PPC and MIPS in
the future, supplanting the ISel expansions those architectures
currently use.
Tests added for the IR transform and SPARCv9.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21029
llvm-svn: 273025
They were accidentally using the 32-bit load/store instruction for
8/16-bit operations, due to incorrect patterns
(8/16-bit cmpxchg and atomicrmw will be fixed in subsequent changes)
llvm-svn: 270486
Due to an erratum in some versions of LEON, we must insert a NOP after any LD or LDF instruction to ensure the processor has time to load the value correctly before using it. This pass will implement that erratum fix.
The code will have no effect for other Sparc, but non-LEON processors.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20353
llvm-svn: 270417
This change adds support for software floating point operations for Sparc targets.
This is the first in a set of patches to enable software floating point on Sparc. The next patch will enable the option to be used with Clang.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19265
llvm-svn: 269892
Added test to check LeonItineraries are being applied by code checked-in two weeks ago in r267121.
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19359
llvm-svn: 269032
Modification of previously existing code (variable rename only), with unit test added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19368
llvm-svn: 268493
This code implements builtin_setjmp and builtin_longjmp exception handling intrinsics for 32-bit Sparc back-ends.
The code started as a mash-up of the PowerPC and X86 versions, although there are sufficient differences to both that had to be made for Sparc handling.
Note: I have manual tests running. I'll work on a unit test and add that to the rest of this diff in the next day.
Also, this implementation is only for 32-bit Sparc. I haven't focussed on a 64-bit version, although I have left the code in a prepared state for implementing this, including detecting pointer size and comments indicating where I suspect there may be differences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19798
llvm-svn: 268483
The SparcV8 fneg and fabs instructions interestingly come only in a
single-float variant. Since the sign bit is always the topmost bit no
matter what size float it is, you simply operate on the high
subregister, as if it were a single float.
However, the layout of double-floats in the float registers is reversed
on little-endian CPUs, so that the high bits are in the second
subregister, rather than the first.
Thus, this expansion must check the endianness to use the correct
subregister.
llvm-svn: 267489
AnalyzeBranch on X86 (and, previously, SPARC, which implementation was
copied from X86) tries to modify the branches based on block
layout (e.g. checking isLayoutSuccessor), when AllowModify is true.
The rest of the architectures leave that up to the caller, which can
call InsertBranch, RemoveBranch, and ReverseBranchCondition as
appropriate. That appears to be the preferred way to do it nowadays.
This commit makes SPARC like the rest: replaces AnalyzeBranch with an
implementation cribbed from AArch64, and adds a ReverseBranchCondition
implementation.
Additionally, a test-case has been added (also cribbed from AArch64)
demonstrating that redundant branch sequences no longer get emitted.
E.g., it used to emit code like this:
bne .LBB1_2
nop
ba .LBB1_1
nop
.LBB1_2:
And now emits:
cmp %i0, 42
be .LBB1_1
nop
llvm-svn: 257572
On SparcV8, doubles get passed in two 32-bit integer registers. The call
code was already handling endianness correctly, but the incoming
argument code was not -- it got the two halves in opposite order.
Also remove some dead code in LowerFormalArguments_32 to handle
less-than-32bit values, which can't actually happen.
Finally, add some test cases for the 32-bit calling convention, cribbed
from the 64abi.ll test, and run for both big and little-endian.
llvm-svn: 255668
This occurred due to introducing the invalid i64 type after type
legalization had already finished, in an attempt to workaround bitcast
f64 -> v2i32 not doing constant folding.
The *right* thing is to actually fix bitcast, but that has other
complications. So, for now, just get rid of the broken workaround, and
check in a test-case showing that it doesn't crash, with TODOs for
emitting proper code.
llvm-svn: 249908
The (mostly-deprecated) SelectionDAG-based ILPListDAGScheduler scheduler
was making poor scheduling decisions, causing high register pressure and
extraneous register spills.
Switching to the newer machine scheduler generates better code -- even
without there being a machine model defined for SPARC yet.
(Actually committing the test changes too, this time, unlike r247315)
llvm-svn: 247343
If you're going to realign %sp to get object alignment properly (which
the code does), and stack offsets and alignments are calculated going
down from %fp (which they are), then the total stack size had better
be a multiple of the alignment. LLVM did indeed ensure that.
And then, after aligning, the sparc frame code added 96 (for sparcv8)
to the frame size, making any requested alignment of 64-bytes or
higher *guaranteed* to be misaligned. The test case added with r245668
even tests this exact scenario, and asserted the incorrect behavior,
which I somehow failed to notice. D'oh.
This change fixes the frame lowering code to align the stack size
*after* adding the spill area, instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12349
llvm-svn: 246042
Note: I do not implement a base pointer, so it's still impossible to
have dynamic realignment AND dynamic alloca in the same function.
This also moves the code for determining the frame index reference
into getFrameIndexReference, where it belongs, instead of inline in
eliminateFrameIndex.
[Begin long-winded screed]
Now, stack realignment for Sparc is actually a silly thing to support,
because the Sparc ABI has no need for it -- unlike the situation on
x86, the stack is ALWAYS aligned to the required alignment for the CPU
instructions: 8 bytes on sparcv8, and 16 bytes on sparcv9.
However, LLVM unfortunately implements user-specified overalignment
using stack realignment support, so for now, I'm going to go along
with that tradition. GCC instead treats objects which have alignment
specification greater than the maximum CPU-required alignment for the
target as a separate block of stack memory, with their own virtual
base pointer (which gets aligned). Doing it that way avoids needing to
implement per-target support for stack realignment, except for the
targets which *actually* have an ABI-specified stack alignment which
is too small for the CPU's requirements.
Further unfortunately in LLVM, the default canRealignStack for all
targets effectively returns true, despite that implementing that is
something a target needs to do specifically. So, the previous behavior
on Sparc was to silently ignore the user's specified stack
alignment. Ugh.
Yet MORE unfortunate, if a target actually does return false from
canRealignStack, that also causes the user-specified alignment to be
*silently ignored*, rather than emitting an error.
(I started looking into fixing that last, but it broke a bunch of
tests, because LLVM actually *depends* on having it silently ignored:
some architectures (e.g. non-linux i386) have smaller stack alignment
than spilled-register alignment. But, the fact that a register needs
spilling is not known until within the register allocator. And by that
point, the decision to not reserve the frame pointer has been frozen
in place. And without a frame pointer, stack realignment is not
possible. So, canRealignStack() returns false, and
needsStackRealignment() then returns false, assuming everyone can just
go on their merry way assuming the alignment requirements were
probably just suggestions after-all. Sigh...)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12208
llvm-svn: 245668
The LDD/STD instructions can load/store a 64bit quantity from/to
memory to/from a consecutive even/odd pair of (32-bit) registers. They
are part of SparcV8, and also present in SparcV9. (Although deprecated
there, as you can store 64bits in one register).
As recommended on llvmdev in the thread "How to enable use of 64bit
load/store for 32bit architecture" from Apr 2015, I've modeled the
64-bit load/store operations as working on a v2i32 type, rather than
making i64 a legal type, but with few legal operations. The latter
does not (currently) work, as there is much code in llvm which assumes
that if i64 is legal, operations like "add" will actually work on it.
The same assumption does not hold for v2i32 -- for vector types, it is
workable to support only load/store, and expand everything else.
This patch:
- Adds a new register class, IntPair, for even/odd pairs of registers.
- Modifies the list of reserved registers, the stack spilling code,
and register copying code to support the IntPair register class.
- Adds support in AsmParser. (note that in asm text, you write the
name of the first register of the pair only. So the parser has to
morph the single register into the equivalent paired register).
- Adds the new instructions themselves (LDD/STD/LDDA/STDA).
- Hooks up the instructions and registers as a vector type v2i32. Adds
custom legalizer to transform i64 load/stores into v2i32 load/stores
and bitcasts, so that the new instructions can actually be
generated, and marks all operations other than load/store on v2i32
as needing to be expanded.
- Copies the unfortunate SelectInlineAsm hack from ARMISelDAGToDAG.
This hack undoes the transformation of i64 operands into two
arbitrarily-allocated separate i32 registers in
SelectionDAGBuilder. and instead passes them in a single
IntPair. (Arbitrarily allocated registers are not useful, asm code
expects to be receiving a pair, which can be passed to ldd/std.)
Also adds a bunch of test cases covering all the bugs I've added along
the way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8713
llvm-svn: 244484
Daniel Cederman