We previously marked all the tests with branch funnels as
`-verify-machineinstrs=0`.
This is an attempt to fix it.
1) `ICALL_BRANCH_FUNNEL` has no defs. Mark it as `let OutOperandList =
(outs)`
2) After that we hit an assert: ``` Assertion failed: (Op.getValueType()
!= MVT::Other && Op.getValueType() != MVT::Glue && "Chain and glue
operands should occur at end of operand list!"), function AddOperand,
file
/Users/francisvm/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/InstrEmitter.cpp,
line 461. ```
The chain operand was added at the beginning of the operand list. Move
that to the end.
3) After that we hit another verifier issue in the pseudo expansion
where the registers used in the cmps and jmps are not added to the
livein lists. Add the `EFLAGS` to all the new MBBs that we create.
PR39436
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54155
llvm-svn: 365058
Summary:
The changes to disable LTO unit splitting by default (r350949) and
detect inconsistently split LTO units (r350948) are causing some crashes
when the inconsistency is detected in multiple threads simultaneously.
Fix that by having the code always look for the inconsistently split
LTO units during the thin link, by checking for the presence of type
tests recorded in the summaries.
Modify test added in r350948 to remove single threading required to fix
a bot failure due to this issue (and some debugging options added in the
process of diagnosing it).
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57561
llvm-svn: 354062
Summary:
Records in the module summary index whether the bitcode was compiled
with the option necessary to enable splitting the LTO unit
(e.g. -fsanitize=cfi, -fwhole-program-vtables, or -fsplit-lto-unit).
The information is passed down to the ModuleSummaryIndex builder via a
new module flag "EnableSplitLTOUnit", which is propagated onto a flag
on the summary index.
This is then used during the LTO link to check whether all linked
summaries were built with the same value of this flag. If not, an error
is issued when we detect a situation requiring whole program visibility
of the class hierarchy. This is the case when both of the following
conditions are met:
1) We are performing LowerTypeTests or Whole Program Devirtualization.
2) There are type tests or type checked loads in the code.
Note I have also changed the ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to also gate the
module splitting on the value of this flag.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: ormris, mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53890
llvm-svn: 350948
Summary:
Currently only the first function in the module is checked to
see if it has remarks enabled. If that first function is a declaration,
remarks will be incorrectly skipped. Change to look for the first
non-empty function.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51556
llvm-svn: 342477
Summary:
When WPD is performed in a ThinLTO backend, the function may be created
if it isn't already in that module. Module::getOrInsertFunction may
add a bitcast, in which case the returned Constant is not a Function and
doesn't have a name. Invoke stripPointerCasts() on the returned value
where we access its name.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49959
llvm-svn: 339640
Summary:
Enable these passes for CFI and WPD in ThinLTO and LTO with the new pass
manager. Add a couple of tests for both PMs based on the clang tests
tools/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-cfi*.ll, but just test
through llvm-lto2 and not with distributed ThinLTO.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49429
llvm-svn: 337461
Francis Visoiu Mistrih