Summary: Honoring no signed zeroes is also available as a user control through clang separately regardless of fastmath or UnsafeFPMath context, DAG guards should reflect this context.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, hfinkel, wristow, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: rampitec, foad, nhaehnle, wuzish, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, javed.absar, MaskRay, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65170
llvm-svn: 367486
We had couple places which still return 10 as a maximum
occupancy. Fixed.
Also print comment about occupancy as compiler see it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65423
llvm-svn: 367381
Summary:
The LoadStoreOptimizer was creating instructions with 2
MachineMemOperands, which meant they were assumed to alias with all other instructions,
because MachineInstr:mayAlias() returns true when an instruction has multiple
MachineMemOperands.
This was preventing these instructions from being merged again, and was
giving the scheduler less freedom to reorder them.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65036
llvm-svn: 367237
Summary:
The existing isDivergent(Value) methods query whether a value is
divergent at its definition. However even if a value is uniform at its
definition, a use of it in another basic block can be divergent because
of divergent control flow between the def and the use.
This patch adds new isDivergent(Use) methods to DivergenceAnalysis,
LegacyDivergenceAnalysis and GPUDivergenceAnalysis.
This might allow D63953 or other similar workarounds to be removed.
Reviewers: alex-t, nhaehnle, arsenm, rtaylor, rampitec, simoll, jingyue
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: jfb, jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65141
llvm-svn: 367218
Summary:
If isel is presented with <2 x half> vectors then it will correctly select
v_pk_fma style instructions.
If isel is presented with e.g. <4 x half> vectors it will scalarize, unlike for
other instruction types (such as fadd, fmul etc.)
Added extra support to enable this. Updated one of the tests to include a test
for this (as well as extending the test to GFX9)
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65325
Change-Id: I50a4577a3f8223fb53992af3b7d26121f65b71ee
llvm-svn: 367206
Summary:
In D62801, new function attribute `willreturn` was introduced. In short, a function with `willreturn` is guaranteed to come back to the call site(more precise definition is in LangRef).
In this patch, willreturn is annotated for LLVM intrinsics.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64904
llvm-svn: 367184
If anything called the recursive isKnownNeverNaN/computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits/SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits with an incorrect depth then we could continue to recurse if we'd already exceeded the depth limit.
This replaces the limit check (Depth == 6) with a (Depth >= 6) to make sure that we don't circumvent it.
This causes a couple of regressions as a mixture of calls (SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits + combineX86ShufflesRecursively) were calling with depths that were already over the limit. I've fixed SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to not do this. combineX86ShufflesRecursively is trickier as we get a lot of regressions if we reduce its own limit from 8 to 6 (it also starts at Depth == 1 instead of Depth == 0 like the others....) - I'll see what I can do in future patches.
llvm-svn: 367171
Add llvm.amdgcn.softwqm intrinsic which behaves like llvm.amdgcn.wqm
only if there is other WQM computation in the shader.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, tpr
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64935
llvm-svn: 367097
handleAssignments gives up pretty easily on structs, and i8 values for
some reason. The other case that doesn't work is when an implicit sret
needs to be inserted if the return size exceeds the number of return
registers.
llvm-svn: 367082
Summary:
- As LCSSA is turned on just before isel, it may create PHI of the flow,
which is consumed by pseudo structurized CFG instructions. When that
PHIs are eliminated in O0, COPY may be placed wrongly as the these
pseudo structurized CFG instructions are considering prologue of MBB.
- Run extra `unreachable-mbb-elimination` at the end of isel to clean up
PHIs.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64353
llvm-svn: 367023
Summary:
This was originally reported in D62818.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oPH
InstCombine does the opposite fold, in hope that `C l>>/<< Y` expression
will be hoisted out of a loop if `Y` is invariant and `X` is not.
But as it is seen from the diffs here, if it didn't get hoisted,
the produced assembly is almost universally worse.
Much like with my recent "hoist add/sub by/from const" patches,
we should get almost universal win if we hoist constant,
there is almost always an "and/test by imm" instruction,
but "shift of imm" not so much, so we may avoid having to
materialize the immediate, and thus need one less register.
And since we now shift not by constant, but by something else,
the live-range of that something else may reduce.
Special care needs to be applied not to disturb x86 `BT` / hexagon `tstbit`
instruction pattern. And to not get into endless combine loop.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, wuzish, xbolva00, nikic, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, kristof.beyls, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62871
llvm-svn: 366955
To support prefetch mode 3 we need to pad current
cacheline and fill 3 cachelines after. Current padding
is only sufficient for mode 2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65236
llvm-svn: 366938
This patch introduces the DAG version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, which attempts to peek through ops (mainly and/or/xor so far) that don't contribute to the demandedbits/elts of a node - which means we can do this even in cases where we have multiple uses of an op, which normally requires us to demanded all bits/elts. The intention is to remove a similar instruction - SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits - once SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits has matured.
The InstCombine version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits can constant fold which I haven't added here yet, and so far I've only wired this up to some basic binops (and/or/xor/add/sub/mul) to demonstrate its use.
We do see a couple of regressions that need to be addressed:
AMDGPU unsigned dot product codegen retains an AND mask (for ZERO_EXTEND) that it previously removed (but otherwise the dotproduct codegen is a lot better).
X86/AVX2 has poor handling of vector ANY_EXTEND/ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG - it prematurely gets converted to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
The code owners have confirmed its ok for these cases to fixed up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63281
llvm-svn: 366799
The top-level BUNDLE instruction should behave as an ordinary
instruction. It is supposed to have all relevant registers as implicit
operands. Moving it should work as any other instruction. I believe
the assert intended to avoid moving instructions inside bundles.
llvm-svn: 366605
This should now handle everything except structs passed as multiple
registers.
I think most of the packing logic should be handled by
handleAssignments, but I'm unclear on what the contract is for
multiple registers. This is copying how x86 handles this.
This does change the behavior of the test_sgpr_alignment0 amdgpu_vs
test. I don't think shader arguments should try to follow the
alignment, and registers need to be repacked. I also don't think it
matters, since I think the pointers are packed to the beginning of the
argument list anyway.
llvm-svn: 366582
Matt Arsenault