part on patches by Peter Collingbourne.
We diverge from the C++11 standard in a few areas, mostly related to checking
constexpr function declarations, and not just definitions. See WG21 paper
N3308=11-0078 for details.
Function invocation substitution is not available in this patch; constexpr
functions cannot yet be used from within constant expressions.
llvm-svn: 140926
the information on to Sema. There's still an incorrectness in the way template instantiation
works now, but that is due to a far larger underlying representational problem.
Also add a test case for various list initialization cases of scalars, which test this
commit as well as the previous one.
llvm-svn: 140460
implicitly instantiable, even if we don't see a body on the friend
function declaration. The body may simply have not yet been attached.
This fixes PR10666.
There may be an alternate, preferred implementation strategy, see my
FIXME. Review would definitely be appreciated Doug. =D
llvm-svn: 137934
Example:
template <class T>
class A {
public:
template <class U> void f(U p) { }
template <> void f(int p) { } // <== class scope specialization
};
This extension is necessary to parse MSVC standard C++ headers, MFC and ATL code.
BTW, with this feature in, clang can parse (-fsyntax-only) all the MSVC 2010 standard header files without any error.
llvm-svn: 137573
point, ASTReader::InitializeSema() has very little interesting work,
*except* issues stemming from preloaded declarations. That's something
we'll still need to cope with.
llvm-svn: 136378
type/expression/template argument/etc. is instantiation-dependent if
it somehow involves a template parameter, even if it doesn't meet the
requirements for the more common kinds of dependence (dependent type,
type-dependent expression, value-dependent expression).
When we see an instantiation-dependent type, we know we always need to
perform substitution into that instantiation-dependent type. This
keeps us from short-circuiting evaluation in places where we
shouldn't, and lets us properly implement C++0x [temp.type]p2.
In theory, this would also allow us to properly mangle
instantiation-dependent-but-not-dependent decltype types per the
Itanium C++ ABI, but we aren't quite there because we still mangle
based on the canonical type in cases like, e.g.,
template<unsigned> struct A { };
template<typename T>
void f(A<sizeof(sizeof(decltype(T() + T())))>) { }
template void f<int>(A<sizeof(sizeof(int))>);
and therefore get the wrong answer.
llvm-svn: 134225
of incomplete array type, attempt to complete the array type. This was
made much easier by Chandler's addition of RequireCompleteExprType(),
which I've tweaked (slightly) to improve the consistency of the
DeclRefExpr. Fixes PR7985.
llvm-svn: 132530
nontemplate in Sema::InstantiateTemplateDecl.
This should make the issue in PR10026 more visible, although it's not
going to fix it because something is violating this precondition.
llvm-svn: 132208
issues and also add a test.
We should now handle defaulted members of templates properly. No
comment as to whether or not this also holds for templated functions,
but defaulting those is kind of insane.
llvm-svn: 131938
The general out-of-line case (including explicit instantiation mostly
works except that the definition is being lost somewhere between the AST
and CodeGen, so the definition is never emitted.
llvm-svn: 131933
fixes PR9965, but we're not out of the water yet, as we do not
successfully handle out-of-line definitions, due to my utter
misunderstanding of how we manage templates.
llvm-svn: 131920
- New isDefined() function checks for deletedness
- isThisDeclarationADefinition checks for deletedness
- New doesThisDeclarationHaveABody() does what
isThisDeclarationADefinition() used to do
- The IsDeleted bit is not propagated across redeclarations
- isDeleted() now checks the canoncial declaration
- New isDeletedAsWritten() does what it says on the tin.
- isUserProvided() now correct (thanks Richard!)
This fixes the bug that we weren't catching
void foo() = delete;
void foo() {}
as being a redefinition.
llvm-svn: 131013
Invalid that was never read from again, causing non-type-template-parms to be
marked valid when in fact they weren't.
This was caught by GCC 4.6's -Wunused-but-set-variable warning.
llvm-svn: 130680
parameter node and use this to correctly mangle parameter
references in function template signatures.
A follow-up patch will improve the storage usage of these
fields; here I've just done the lazy thing.
llvm-svn: 130669
accompanying fixes to make it work today.
The core of this patch is to provide a link from a TemplateTypeParmType
back to the TemplateTypeParmDecl node which declared it. This in turn
provides much more precise information about the type, where it came
from, and how it functions for AST consumers.
To make the patch work almost a year after its first attempt, it needed
serialization support, and it now retains the old getName() interface.
Finally, it requires us to not attempt to instantiate the type in an
unsupported friend decl -- specifically those coming from template
friend decls but which refer to a specific type through a dependent
name.
A cleaner representation of the last item would be to build
FriendTemplateDecl nodes for these, storing their template parameters
etc, and to perform proper instantation of them like any other template
declaration. They can still be flagged as unsupported for the purpose of
access checking, etc.
This passed an asserts-enabled bootstrap for me, and the reduced test
case mentioned in the original review thread no longer causes issues,
likely fixed at somewhere amidst the 24k revisions that have elapsed.
llvm-svn: 130628
new templates that need to be instantiated and vice-versa. Iterate
until we've instantiated all required templates and defined all
required vtables. Fixed PR9325 / <rdar://problem/9055177>.
llvm-svn: 130023
gcc's unused warnings which don't get emitted if the function is referenced even in an unevaluated context
(e.g. in templates, sizeof, etc.). Also, saying that a function is 'unused' because it won't get codegen'ed
is somewhat misleading.
- Don't emit 'unused' warnings for functions that are referenced in any part of the user's code.
- A warning that an internal function/variable won't get emitted is useful though, so introduce
-Wunneeded-internal-declaration which will warn if a function/variable with internal linkage is not
"needed" ('used' from the codegen perspective), e.g:
static void foo() { }
template <int>
void bar() {
foo();
}
test.cpp:1:13: warning: function 'foo' is not needed and will not be emitted
static void foo() { }
^
Addresses rdar://8733476.
llvm-svn: 129794
Change the interface to expose the new information and deal with the enormous fallout.
Introduce the new ExceptionSpecificationType value EST_DynamicNone to more easily deal with empty throw specifications.
Update the tests for noexcept and fix the various bugs uncovered, such as lack of tentative parsing support.
llvm-svn: 127537
declaration because of interesting ordering dependencies while
instantiating a class template or member class thereof. Complain,
rather than asserting (+Asserts) or silently rejecting the code
(-Asserts).
Fixes the crash-on-invalid in PR8965.
llvm-svn: 127129
to find the instantiated declaration within a template instantiation
fails to do so. It's likely that the original instantiation got
dropped due to instantiation failures, which doesn't actually break
the invariants of the AST. This eliminates a number of
crash-on-invalid failures, e.g., PR9300.
llvm-svn: 127030
DeclContext once we've created it. This mirrors what we do for
function parameters, where the parameters start out with
translation-unit context and then are adopted by the appropriate
DeclContext when it is created. Also give template parameters public
access and make sure that they don't show up for the purposes of name
lookup.
Fixes PR9400, a regression introduced by r126920, which implemented
substitution of default template arguments provided in template
template parameters (C++ core issue 150).
How on earth could the DeclContext of a template parameter affect the
handling of default template arguments?
I'm so glad you asked! The link is
Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs(), which determines the outer
template argument lists that correspond to a given declaration. When
we're instantiating a default template argument for a template
template parameter within the body of a template definition (not it's
instantiation, per core issue 150), we weren't getting any outer
template arguments because the context of the template template
parameter was the translation unit. Now that the context of the
template template parameter is its owning template, we get the
template arguments from the injected-class-name of the owning
template, so substitution works as it should.
llvm-svn: 127004
1) When we do an instantiation of the injected-class-name type,
provide a proper source location. This is just plain good hygiene.
2) When we're building a NestedNameSpecifierLoc from a CXXScopeSpec,
only return an empty NestedNameSpecifierLoc if there's no
representation.
Both problems contributed to the horrible test case in PR9390 that I
couldn't reduce down to something palatable.
llvm-svn: 126961
UnresolvedUsingValueDecl to use NestedNameSpecifierLoc rather than the
extremely-lossy NestedNameSpecifier/SourceRange pair it used to use,
improving source-location information.
Various infrastructure updates to support NestedNameSpecifierLoc:
- AST/PCH (de-)serialization
- Recursive AST visitor
- libclang traversal (including the first tests of this
functionality)
llvm-svn: 126459
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
making them be template instantiated in a more normal way and
make them handle attributes like other decls.
This fixes the used/unused label handling stuff, making it use
the same infrastructure as other decls.
llvm-svn: 125771
access-control diagnostics which arise from the portion of the declarator
following the scope specifier, just in case access is granted by
friending the individual method. This can also happen with in-line
member function declarations of class templates due to templated-scope
friend declarations.
We were really playing fast-and-loose before with this sort of thing,
and it turned out to work because *most* friend functions are in file
scope. Making us delay regardless of context exposed several bugs with
how we were manipulating delay. I ended up needing a concept of a
context that's independent of the declarations in which it appears,
and then I actually had to make some things save contexts correctly,
but delay should be much cleaner now.
I also encapsulated all the delayed-diagnostics machinery in a single
subobject of Sema; this is a pattern we might want to consider rolling
out to other components of Sema.
llvm-svn: 125485
extremely rambunctious, both on parsing and on template instantiation.
Calm it down, fixing an internal consistency assert on anonymous enum
instantiation manglings.
llvm-svn: 124653
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
parameters it expanded to, map exactly the number of function
parameters that were expanded rather than just running to the end of
the instantiated parameter list. This finishes the implementation of
the last sentence of C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p1.
llvm-svn: 123213
sentence of [temp.deduct.call]p1, both of which concern the
non-deducibility of parameter packs not at the end of a
parameter-type-list. The latter isn't fully implemented yet; see the
new FIXME.
llvm-svn: 123210
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
TreeTransform version of TransformExprs() rather than explicit loop,
so that we expand pack expansions properly. Test cast coming soon...
llvm-svn: 123014
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
pattern is a template argument, which involves repeatedly deducing
template arguments using the pattern of the pack expansion, then
bundling the resulting deductions into an argument pack.
We can now handle a variety of simple list-handling metaprograms using
variadic templates. See, e.g., the new "count" metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 122439
class to be passed around. The line between argument and return types and
everything else is kindof vague, but I think it's justifiable.
llvm-svn: 121752
Douglas Gregor